Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Canyons.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Abel Tasman Canyons
Valid Reviews
62 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Canyons experience has a total of 63 reviews. There are 62 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 55 |
|
89% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.06% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Canyons valid reviews is 98.06% and is based on 62 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 62 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Canyons face-to-face reviews is 96.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claire Roche | 10/10 | 91 days | 100% |
| Lesley A | 10/10 | 336 days | 94% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 427 days | 90% |
| David Senn | 9/10 | 702 days | 71% |
| Silvia | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
| Kez | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
| Garry | 5/10 | 792 days | 49% |
| Kelly | 10/10 | 1522 days | 10% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 1826 days | 5% |
| LP | 10/10 | 1888 days | 5% |
| Carolyn Payne | 10/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
| David Taus | 9/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
| Marjan D | 10/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Ines | 10/10 | 2528 days | 4% |
| Engelbert Rose | 8/10 | 2528 days | 4% |
| Alan Koutsaris | 10/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
| Ben Carless | 10/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
| Nicole Kasischke | 10/10 | 2650 days | 2% |
| Zachary Gray | 10/10 | 2892 days | 3% |
| Gloria Huang | 10/10 | 3012 days | 3% |
| Shannon Higgs | 10/10 | 3012 days | 3% |
| Gruet Titaina | 10/10 | 3030 days | 2% |
| Tom Judd | 10/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
| Estelle Leyshon | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Sven and Annie | 9/10 | 3300 days | 1% |
| Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Xue Rong Kok | 10/10 | 3348 days | 2% |
| Kristen Davies | 10/10 | 3348 days | 2% |
| Eric Ross | 10/10 | 3374 days | 2% |
| Clare_R84 | 10/10 | 3592 days | 1% |
| Julie Edwards | 10/10 | 3592 days | 1% |
| Donna Beeson | 10/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Peck | 10/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Lachlan Purvis | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Lawrence Radcliffe | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| tania jones | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Jeff van Oostrom | 10/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Paul de Bruijn | 10/10 | 3724 days | 1% |
| Jake May | 10/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Janina Zwerver | 9/10 | 3991 days | 0% |
| Heidi J | 9/10 | 4079 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Avison | 10/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Raymond Ligtenbarg | 10/10 | 4140 days | 0% |
| huneebe | 10/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Beth Scrivens | 10/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Carrie O'Donnell | 10/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Tracey Parks | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Anna Li | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Julian_ont | 10/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| Philip Beech | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Tobias J | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Binestra | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Christian Marzy | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| VernonC | 10/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
| Eva_24 | 10/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
| Joan and Colin Price | 10/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
| gibblet | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| mbohall1 | 10/10 | 4505 days | 1% |
| lelder | 10/10 | 4505 days | 1% |
| Happyapple | 10/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Canyons experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.59% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Abel Tasman Canyons experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Canyons experience has been adjusted for 77 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 74 | -1.53% |
| 75 | -1.55% |
| 76 | -1.57% |
| 77 | -1.59% |
| 78 | -1.61% |
| 79 | -1.64% |
| 80 | -1.66% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.60% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.