G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 367 days | 100% |
Sarah | 6/10 | 824 days | 58% |
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2316 days | 4% |
Sebasitian | 7/10 | 2947 days | 3% |
Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 2967 days | 3% |
Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 2994 days | 3% |
Maarten | 5/10 | 2996 days | 2% |
Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3000 days | 3% |
Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3029 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3131 days | 3% |
Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3236 days | 2% |
Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3258 days | 2% |
Liwen | 5/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3269 days | 1% |
Chris | 6/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
Sandrine | 5/10 | 3281 days | 2% |
Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3395 days | 2% |
Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3490 days | 2% |
James Webster | 9/10 | 3592 days | 2% |
Carmen | 8/10 | 3616 days | 2% |
Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
Isabelle | 9/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
Laure Cops | 9/10 | 3975 days | 1% |
Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
Viola | 8/10 | 4018 days | 1% |
Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4019 days | 1% |
Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4026 days | 1% |
Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4026 days | 1% |
Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4033 days | 1% |
Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4060 days | 1% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4081 days | 1% |
Brian | 9/10 | 4111 days | 0% |
Stefan | 9/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4415 days | 1% |
Loesje | 6/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 4708 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 4710 days | 1% |
Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 4725 days | 0% |
Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 4730 days | 1% |
Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
Diane Moss | 8/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
Carel | 7/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
Kai | 10/10 | 4818 days | 1% |
Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 4822 days | 1% |
cruisysue | 8/10 | 4934 days | 1% |
Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Marcus | 9/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5077 days | 1% |
Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5085 days | 1% |
Marcus | 8/10 | 5092 days | 1% |
Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5092 days | 1% |
Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5103 days | 1% |
Jensen | 8/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
Jochen | 8/10 | 5113 days | 1% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5114 days | 1% |
Montys | 9/10 | 5238 days | 1% |
Bowness | 9/10 | 5439 days | 1% |
Main | 9/10 | 5453 days | 1% |
Krause | 10/10 | 5461 days | 1% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
John Helle | 7/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Mathias | 3/10 | 5480 days | 1% |
middendorp | 10/10 | 5526 days | 1% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
JonK | 9/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
SophieC | 9/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
JanW | 3/10 | 5798 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
4.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.