Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

77.48%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 676 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1133 days 38%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2625 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3256 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3276 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3293 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3303 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3305 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3309 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3338 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3440 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3542 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3545 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3553 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3555 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3555 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3564 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3564 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3567 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3572 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3578 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3587 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3590 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3606 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3606 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3611 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3645 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3659 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3661 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3704 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3781 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3799 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3901 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3925 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3961 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 3981 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 3993 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4016 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4270 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4271 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4284 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4315 days 0%
Viola 8/10 4327 days 0%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4328 days 0%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4335 days 0%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4335 days 0%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4342 days 0%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4360 days 0%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4369 days 0%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4390 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4420 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4650 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4650 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4724 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4755 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4762 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4762 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5017 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5019 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5027 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5034 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5039 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5042 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5044 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5044 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5044 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5045 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5056 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5127 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5131 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5243 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5335 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5355 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5365 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5386 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5390 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5390 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5394 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5401 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5401 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5412 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5421 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5422 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5423 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5547 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5748 days 1%
Main 9/10 5762 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5770 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5774 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5774 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5782 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5789 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5835 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5851 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5863 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5863 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6004 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6083 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6090 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6107 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.76% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.