G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 295 days | 100% |
Sarah | 6/10 | 752 days | 63% |
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2244 days | 4% |
Sebasitian | 7/10 | 2875 days | 3% |
Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 2895 days | 3% |
Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 2922 days | 3% |
Maarten | 5/10 | 2924 days | 2% |
Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
Ulrich K | 5/10 | 2957 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3058 days | 3% |
Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3161 days | 2% |
Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3172 days | 2% |
Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3174 days | 2% |
Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3174 days | 3% |
Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3183 days | 2% |
Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3183 days | 2% |
Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
Liwen | 5/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3197 days | 2% |
Chris | 6/10 | 3206 days | 2% |
Sandrine | 5/10 | 3209 days | 2% |
Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3323 days | 2% |
Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3400 days | 2% |
Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3417 days | 2% |
James Webster | 9/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
Carmen | 8/10 | 3544 days | 2% |
Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3580 days | 2% |
Isabelle | 9/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 3612 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 3635 days | 2% |
Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 3889 days | 1% |
Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 3890 days | 1% |
Laure Cops | 9/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 3934 days | 1% |
Viola | 8/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 3954 days | 1% |
Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 3954 days | 1% |
Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 3979 days | 1% |
Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 3988 days | 1% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
Brian | 9/10 | 4039 days | 1% |
Stefan | 9/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Loesje | 6/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 4646 days | 1% |
Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 4653 days | 0% |
Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
Diane Moss | 8/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
Carel | 7/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
Kai | 10/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 4750 days | 1% |
cruisysue | 8/10 | 4861 days | 1% |
Phill2517 | 9/10 | 4953 days | 1% |
Marcus | 9/10 | 4973 days | 1% |
Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 4984 days | 1% |
Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
Marcus | 8/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
Jensen | 8/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
Jochen | 8/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
Montys | 9/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
Bowness | 9/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
Main | 9/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
Krause | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
John Helle | 7/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
Mathias | 3/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
middendorp | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5622 days | 1% |
JonK | 9/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
SophieC | 9/10 | 5708 days | 1% |
JanW | 3/10 | 5726 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
4.33% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.