Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mossburn Country Park

Valid Reviews

120 Valid Reviews

The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 128 reviews. There are 120 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 120 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 72
60%
9/10 24
20%
8/10 15
13%
7/10 6
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

92.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.33% and is based on 120 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

15 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 120 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
33%
9/10 4
27%
8/10 5
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.64%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Christiane 10/10 51 days 100%
Caron 10/10 234 days 97%
Miriam 10/10 325 days 94%
Sandra Staples 9/10 325 days 93%
Chris H 10/10 356 days 93%
Julia Richter 10/10 356 days 93%
Diana Antunez 10/10 386 days 92%
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com 10/10 386 days 92%
Chc 10/10 386 days 92%
annelie slaar 9/10 417 days 89%
Ren15 10/10 417 days 90%
Victoria 7/10 417 days 84%
Pauline 10/10 417 days 90%
Elke 10/10 600 days 80%
Tasmin 9/10 631 days 77%
Katie Edser 10/10 631 days 77%
Kelsey Fisher 10/10 631 days 77%
Dave and Nicky 10/10 721 days 70%
Rob J 9/10 721 days 70%
Sue and Ron 10/10 751 days 68%
Shona Beach 10/10 751 days 68%
Joan Hermitage 10/10 782 days 65%
Yuri Fey 10/10 782 days 65%
Russell 1/10 782 days 26%
Anne S 9/10 996 days 44%
Heather and Jim 10/10 1086 days 36%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 1147 days 31%
Steven 10/10 1361 days 17%
Luke 10/10 1389 days 16%
Cait Turner 8/10 1420 days 14%
Tori 10/10 1451 days 13%
Joanne 10/10 1512 days 10%
Lynley and Ian Breeze 10/10 1512 days 10%
Lauren 8/10 1726 days 5%
Amy 10/10 1755 days 5%
Moritz 10/10 1755 days 5%
Pierre-Yves 10/10 1755 days 5%
Allan and Kelly 10/10 1755 days 5%
Johan 10/10 1755 days 5%
Melissa 10/10 1786 days 5%
Nik 10/10 1786 days 5%
Erica 10/10 1786 days 5%
Leon 9/10 1786 days 5%
Chris 10/10 1817 days 5%
Peter Nesnebse 8/10 1817 days 5%
Antoine 10/10 1847 days 5%
Lucie 10/10 1847 days 5%
Javier Williams 9/10 1847 days 5%
K&KRahimi 9/10 1847 days 5%
Shona Beach 10/10 1878 days 5%
Vicki Hoskinson 10/10 2092 days 4%
John 9/10 2092 days 4%
Kathryn Torkington 10/10 2120 days 4%
Brigitta 8/10 2120 days 4%
Marty 10/10 2120 days 4%
From DK 9/10 2151 days 4%
Francois & Caroline 9/10 2151 days 4%
Yh kim 10/10 2151 days 4%
Richard 9/10 2151 days 4%
Nadine 10/10 2182 days 4%
Sellers Family 10/10 2212 days 4%
Shona Beach 10/10 2243 days 4%
Carl 10/10 2243 days 4%
S Becker 10/10 2426 days 4%
Jos Mulder 10/10 2488 days 4%
Suzanne Wijsman 9/10 2493 days 3%
Xiao Xiao 9/10 2526 days 3%
Kerine Au 10/10 2547 days 3%
Lukas Hauser 10/10 2565 days 3%
Crystal Wang 3/10 2579 days 2%
Madelyn Fagerman 10/10 2785 days 3%
Vicki 10/10 2795 days 3%
Frank Hofmann 10/10 2816 days 3%
Marie Blom 10/10 2820 days 3%
Josh Marks 10/10 2834 days 3%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 9/10 2864 days 3%
Barbara-Rose Townsend 9/10 2867 days 3%
Martine Baars 10/10 2885 days 3%
Ajit Raut 10/10 2927 days 3%
Ivan Wee 8/10 2941 days 3%
Nancy LeRoy 9/10 2942 days 3%
Ivan W. 10/10 2973 days 3%
Susan H 10/10 2975 days 3%
Matteo Verzi 7/10 3174 days 2%
Sandy Bell 10/10 3214 days 2%
Louise Alexander 10/10 3216 days 2%
Yuan Lin 8/10 3221 days 2%
Rachel Macdonald 7/10 3236 days 2%
robert zdebski 9/10 3278 days 2%
Sarah Gurney 7/10 3285 days 2%
Graham Lighner 10/10 3288 days 1%
Jennifer Brown 9/10 3308 days 2%
Lena + Kristof 10/10 3553 days 1%
Thomas Blom 8/10 3581 days 1%
Kodie Howarth 10/10 3610 days 1%
Rasmus Rantil 10/10 3616 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 10/10 3623 days 1%
Kim Frey 7/10 3623 days 1%
Silvia Hudakova 10/10 3643 days 1%
Julian Kuemme 10/10 3893 days 0%
Andrea Sole 10/10 3893 days 0%
Mandy Reich 9/10 3894 days 0%
Monique Monique 7/10 3946 days 1%
Petra Niemann 10/10 3977 days 1%
Eric and Nienke 8/10 4008 days 1%
J Murphy 8/10 4038 days 0%
Luise Fuchs 9/10 4273 days 0%
Michal 8/10 4287 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4287 days 0%
Guillot 9/10 4290 days 0%
phudgb 10/10 4434 days 1%
Rebecca Doehl 8/10 4661 days 1%
Sue DeVries 8/10 4991 days 1%
Marii Joekalda 9/10 4997 days 1%
Tina Madsen 8/10 5000 days 1%
Sabine Tippman 6/10 5000 days 0%
nelliekaye 9/10 5195 days 1%
hellami 8/10 5499 days 1%
Andrea 10/10 5630 days 1%
JohannaB 10/10 5732 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.67% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 33 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
30 -0.61%
31 -0.63%
32 -0.65%
33 -0.67%
34 -0.69%
35 -0.71%
36 -0.73%

Balancing Adjustment

0.43% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.