Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mossburn Country Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
125 Valid Reviews
The Mossburn Country Park experience has a total of 133 reviews. There are 125 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 125 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 76 |
|
61% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
19% |
8/10 | 15 |
|
12% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
6% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
92.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park valid reviews is 92.40% and is based on 125 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
15 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 125 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 5 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 5 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mossburn Country Park face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.44%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Andy Williamson | 10/10 | 38 days | 100% |
YC | 10/10 | 38 days | 100% |
Anne | 10/10 | 38 days | 100% |
Brett | 7/10 | 38 days | 93% |
Charly and family | 10/10 | 69 days | 100% |
Christiane | 10/10 | 130 days | 99% |
Caron | 10/10 | 313 days | 94% |
Miriam | 10/10 | 404 days | 91% |
Sandra Staples | 9/10 | 404 days | 90% |
Chris H | 10/10 | 435 days | 89% |
Julia Richter | 10/10 | 435 days | 89% |
Diana Antunez | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
Chc | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
annelie slaar | 9/10 | 496 days | 85% |
Ren15 | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
Victoria | 7/10 | 496 days | 80% |
Pauline | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
Elke | 10/10 | 679 days | 74% |
Tasmin | 9/10 | 710 days | 71% |
Katie Edser | 10/10 | 710 days | 71% |
Kelsey Fisher | 10/10 | 710 days | 71% |
Dave and Nicky | 10/10 | 800 days | 64% |
Rob J | 9/10 | 800 days | 63% |
Sue and Ron | 10/10 | 830 days | 61% |
Shona Beach | 10/10 | 830 days | 61% |
Joan Hermitage | 10/10 | 860 days | 58% |
Yuri Fey | 10/10 | 861 days | 58% |
Russell | 1/10 | 861 days | 23% |
Anne S | 9/10 | 1075 days | 37% |
Heather and Jim | 10/10 | 1165 days | 30% |
Kathryn Torkington | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
Steven | 10/10 | 1440 days | 13% |
Luke | 10/10 | 1468 days | 12% |
Cait Turner | 8/10 | 1499 days | 11% |
Tori | 10/10 | 1530 days | 10% |
Joanne | 10/10 | 1591 days | 8% |
Lynley and Ian Breeze | 10/10 | 1591 days | 8% |
Lauren | 8/10 | 1805 days | 5% |
Amy | 10/10 | 1834 days | 5% |
Moritz | 10/10 | 1834 days | 5% |
Pierre-Yves | 10/10 | 1834 days | 5% |
Allan and Kelly | 10/10 | 1834 days | 5% |
Johan | 10/10 | 1834 days | 5% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1865 days | 5% |
Nik | 10/10 | 1865 days | 5% |
Erica | 10/10 | 1865 days | 5% |
Leon | 9/10 | 1865 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
Peter Nesnebse | 8/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
Antoine | 10/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
Lucie | 10/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
Javier Williams | 9/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
K&KRahimi | 9/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
Shona Beach | 10/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
John | 9/10 | 2171 days | 4% |
Kathryn Torkington | 10/10 | 2199 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 8/10 | 2199 days | 4% |
Marty | 10/10 | 2199 days | 4% |
From DK | 9/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
Francois & Caroline | 9/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
Yh kim | 10/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
Richard | 9/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
Nadine | 10/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
Sellers Family | 10/10 | 2291 days | 4% |
Shona Beach | 10/10 | 2322 days | 4% |
Carl | 10/10 | 2322 days | 4% |
S Becker | 10/10 | 2505 days | 4% |
Jos Mulder | 10/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
Suzanne Wijsman | 9/10 | 2572 days | 3% |
Xiao Xiao | 9/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
Kerine Au | 10/10 | 2625 days | 3% |
Lukas Hauser | 10/10 | 2644 days | 3% |
Crystal Wang | 3/10 | 2658 days | 2% |
Madelyn Fagerman | 10/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
Vicki | 10/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2895 days | 3% |
Marie Blom | 10/10 | 2899 days | 3% |
Josh Marks | 10/10 | 2913 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 9/10 | 2943 days | 3% |
Barbara-Rose Townsend | 9/10 | 2946 days | 3% |
Martine Baars | 10/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
Ajit Raut | 10/10 | 3006 days | 3% |
Ivan Wee | 8/10 | 3020 days | 3% |
Nancy LeRoy | 9/10 | 3020 days | 3% |
Ivan W. | 10/10 | 3051 days | 3% |
Susan H | 10/10 | 3054 days | 3% |
Matteo Verzi | 7/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
Louise Alexander | 10/10 | 3294 days | 2% |
Yuan Lin | 8/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
Rachel Macdonald | 7/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
robert zdebski | 9/10 | 3356 days | 2% |
Sarah Gurney | 7/10 | 3364 days | 2% |
Graham Lighner | 10/10 | 3367 days | 1% |
Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
Lena + Kristof | 10/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
Thomas Blom | 8/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
Kodie Howarth | 10/10 | 3689 days | 1% |
Rasmus Rantil | 10/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Kim Frey | 7/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Silvia Hudakova | 10/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
Julian Kuemme | 10/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
Andrea Sole | 10/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
Mandy Reich | 9/10 | 3973 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 7/10 | 4025 days | 1% |
Petra Niemann | 10/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
Eric and Nienke | 8/10 | 4087 days | 1% |
J Murphy | 8/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
Luise Fuchs | 9/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
Michal | 8/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
Guillot | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
phudgb | 10/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
Rebecca Doehl | 8/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
Sue DeVries | 8/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
Marii Joekalda | 9/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Tina Madsen | 8/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
Sabine Tippman | 6/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 9/10 | 5274 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5578 days | 1% |
Andrea | 10/10 | 5709 days | 1% |
JohannaB | 10/10 | 5811 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mossburn Country Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.10% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 51 days. However the Mossburn Country Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mossburn Country Park experience has been adjusted for 5 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
2 | -0.04% |
3 | -0.06% |
4 | -0.08% |
5 | -0.10% |
6 | -0.12% |
7 | -0.15% |
8 | -0.17% |
… | … |
0.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.