Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cascade Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
181 Valid Reviews
The Cascade Creek Campsite experience has a total of 181 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 181 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 22 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
79.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite valid reviews is 79.45% and is based on 181 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 181 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
79.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 79.23% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.89%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 8/10 | 49 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| Guybert | 7/10 | 79 days | 94% |
| Dom | 7/10 | 79 days | 94% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 79 days | 99% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 110 days | 98% |
| Rory M | 8/10 | 110 days | 98% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 263 days | 97% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 293 days | 94% |
| Jacinta | 10/10 | 293 days | 96% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 324 days | 93% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 352 days | 93% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 352 days | 94% |
| Fredrik | 7/10 | 383 days | 86% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 383 days | 91% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 414 days | 90% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 444 days | 89% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 444 days | 90% |
| Glenda | 9/10 | 505 days | 86% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 597 days | 81% |
| Janneke | 5/10 | 658 days | 58% |
| YP | 7/10 | 658 days | 71% |
| Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 689 days | 74% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 718 days | 71% |
| Lu | 7/10 | 718 days | 66% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 718 days | 71% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 780 days | 61% |
| Paloma Santos | 3/10 | 780 days | 36% |
| Philippe & Lena | 4/10 | 810 days | 41% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 810 days | 63% |
| Larissa | 6/10 | 810 days | 55% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 810 days | 63% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 841 days | 59% |
| Hayley Ambrose | 3/10 | 871 days | 31% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 871 days | 56% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 933 days | 50% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 10/10 | 994 days | 45% |
| Christy | 7/10 | 994 days | 42% |
| Amy Catley | 6/10 | 994 days | 39% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 1024 days | 42% |
| Anthony V | 9/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
| Srinivas Prasad Bheemanadam | 9/10 | 1083 days | 36% |
| Lisa | 2/10 | 1083 days | 17% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Sophie Rellensmann | 7/10 | 1114 days | 32% |
| Arie | 8/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Amanda Moreira | 7/10 | 1114 days | 32% |
| Romy De Bruin | 6/10 | 1175 days | 25% |
| Rebecca Woodbridge | 7/10 | 1175 days | 27% |
| Felix | 9/10 | 1175 days | 29% |
| Mil | 5/10 | 1175 days | 22% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1267 days | 23% |
| The Gillies | 10/10 | 1785 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 5/10 | 1905 days | 4% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2179 days | 4% |
| Tanja & Sven | 8/10 | 2210 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| GM | 9/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| Tilly Watermeyer | 9/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 9/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
| Karl Ohm | 7/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Maggie | 6/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Elin | 10/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 9/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| Georgia | 8/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| Megan Belanger | 9/10 | 2544 days | 4% |
| Freya | 8/10 | 2544 days | 4% |
| Nicki Chow | 6/10 | 2544 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Yh kim | 5/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
| Ruddah | 5/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 5/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Mahi | 9/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Cora | 9/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Nadine | 8/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 9/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 8/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| J wells | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
| Clobby | 7/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Hanneke van Dijk | 8/10 | 2914 days | 2% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2923 days | 2% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 8/10 | 2930 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2935 days | 3% |
| Anika Bedard | 6/10 | 2935 days | 2% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 5/10 | 2937 days | 2% |
| Fiona Walker | 9/10 | 2940 days | 3% |
| Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 2953 days | 3% |
| Gema Frontera | 8/10 | 2982 days | 3% |
| Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 2999 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3035 days | 3% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3039 days | 3% |
| Sue Rogers | 10/10 | 3062 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3115 days | 2% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3189 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 8/10 | 3209 days | 2% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 3220 days | 2% |
| Shanna de Lang | 7/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| Connie | 8/10 | 3224 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| J Dobias | 3/10 | 3327 days | 1% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 8/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Greg MacFire | 6/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Jill Grange | 7/10 | 3359 days | 1% |
| Melanie Giroux | 8/10 | 3410 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 8/10 | 3550 days | 2% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3559 days | 2% |
| Andrik | 3/10 | 3577 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3582 days | 2% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 9/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Jenny Adams | 7/10 | 3594 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 8/10 | 3612 days | 1% |
| Marina | 10/10 | 3637 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Sam Brydon | 8/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Lucia | 8/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Judith Simpson | 5/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 7/10 | 3916 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 3975 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 8/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 9/10 | 4024 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4128 days | 0% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 1/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 1/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| Austin Johns | 8/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Sarah Christman | 6/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Manuela Michelbach | 7/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 6/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 9/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Michael Stark | 10/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 8/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4493 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4493 days | 1% |
| Tim Vennewold | 7/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4702 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
| Jon Barratt | 7/10 | 4803 days | 1% |
| Harald | 9/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
| Paul Fairbrass | 9/10 | 5094 days | 1% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 8/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 7/10 | 5164 days | 1% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5254 days | 1% |
| Becky Edney | 8/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
| Brian Jones | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
| T Lipscombe | 4/10 | 5430 days | 0% |
| Betten | 9/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 10/10 | 5439 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 5848 days | 1% |
| Suzie Lechner | 10/10 | 6157 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cascade Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.51% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.