Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Boundary Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Boundary Creek Campsite
Valid Reviews
83 Valid Reviews
The Boundary Creek Campsite experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 83 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 83 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
82.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite valid reviews is 82.29% and is based on 83 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 83 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
72.30%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Newman | 1/10 | 122 days | 100% |
| Cait Turner | 10/10 | 1491 days | 28% |
| Drew | 10/10 | 1857 days | 12% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 1857 days | 12% |
| Timothy Davies | 7/10 | 1918 days | 11% |
| A&E | 8/10 | 1949 days | 12% |
| ScoutnIndi | 10/10 | 2071 days | 11% |
| Fabian | 10/10 | 2222 days | 10% |
| Joe | 8/10 | 2222 days | 10% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 2222 days | 10% |
| From DK | 9/10 | 2222 days | 10% |
| Heather Abbott | 8/10 | 2222 days | 10% |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 2253 days | 10% |
| Graham Anna | 10/10 | 2253 days | 10% |
| Dave Reynolds | 9/10 | 2253 days | 10% |
| Joanne | 10/10 | 2283 days | 10% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2314 days | 10% |
| Christina | 6/10 | 2497 days | 8% |
| Juliane | 9/10 | 2497 days | 9% |
| MJW | 8/10 | 2528 days | 9% |
| Qi Moss | 8/10 | 2528 days | 9% |
| Jill McGrath | 6/10 | 2551 days | 6% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 7/10 | 2554 days | 6% |
| Niall McGrath | 7/10 | 2558 days | 8% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 7/10 | 2577 days | 6% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2582 days | 9% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2628 days | 8% |
| Jarod | 8/10 | 2647 days | 8% |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 2653 days | 8% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2708 days | 8% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 2836 days | 7% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 2841 days | 7% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 2892 days | 7% |
| Andy Kubic | 6/10 | 2899 days | 6% |
| Adrian Soldati | 6/10 | 2947 days | 6% |
| Joe Hopkins | 8/10 | 2950 days | 7% |
| Nicola Barlow | 6/10 | 2978 days | 6% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 2982 days | 5% |
| Sujanyag | 10/10 | 3017 days | 7% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3086 days | 6% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 3235 days | 5% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3244 days | 5% |
| Juan Viscegle | 6/10 | 3251 days | 4% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3257 days | 5% |
| Gabor Kabacs | 7/10 | 3269 days | 5% |
| Bill McMurray | 10/10 | 3269 days | 5% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 5/10 | 3278 days | 4% |
| R Werder | 8/10 | 3302 days | 5% |
| Jakob Kofoed | 10/10 | 3307 days | 5% |
| Sandy Stamp | 8/10 | 3320 days | 5% |
| Ellen Schmitz | 9/10 | 3329 days | 5% |
| Steve Warren | 8/10 | 3440 days | 4% |
| Miguel | 8/10 | 3623 days | 4% |
| Bert Gielen | 9/10 | 3655 days | 3% |
| Petra Geblova | 7/10 | 3671 days | 3% |
| Elles Janssen | 7/10 | 3682 days | 3% |
| Clare Lambley | 8/10 | 3699 days | 3% |
| bzh974 | 6/10 | 3713 days | 3% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 3958 days | 2% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Lena Wacker | 9/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4040 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 8/10 | 4201 days | 1% |
| Rainer | 8/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 5/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Kadyan | 8/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Enna Keet | 8/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Nils Poppenborg | 10/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Philip Gibbons | 9/10 | 4382 days | 2% |
| Andreas & Leonie Fehr | 10/10 | 4740 days | 2% |
| Tom Connis | 9/10 | 4747 days | 2% |
| Mirando4ka | 9/10 | 4748 days | 2% |
| Graeme | 7/10 | 4779 days | 2% |
| jule | 9/10 | 4840 days | 2% |
| Bill Mclennan | 10/10 | 5067 days | 2% |
| Coral Last | 8/10 | 5071 days | 2% |
| Ian and Ailsa | 7/10 | 5072 days | 2% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 5106 days | 2% |
| Annette Schmitt | 9/10 | 5472 days | 2% |
| Mike | 10/10 | 5524 days | 2% |
| Becca1 | 9/10 | 5786 days | 2% |
| winter_uk | 8/10 | 5827 days | 2% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Boundary Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
5.81% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.