G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 281 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 173 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 204 days | 99% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 234 days | 99% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 265 days | 98% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 294 days | 97% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 294 days | 95% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 325 days | 96% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 417 days | 92% |
Chris | 8/10 | 417 days | 90% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 447 days | 84% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 539 days | 85% |
L&P | 8/10 | 570 days | 81% |
Alley | 10/10 | 570 days | 83% |
Josh | 9/10 | 600 days | 80% |
Niff | 10/10 | 631 days | 79% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 659 days | 77% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 659 days | 77% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 690 days | 74% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 721 days | 72% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 751 days | 68% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 751 days | 69% |
Evan | 10/10 | 751 days | 69% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 782 days | 66% |
Emily | 10/10 | 782 days | 66% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 782 days | 65% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 812 days | 63% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 812 days | 63% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 843 days | 60% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1239 days | 25% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1239 days | 25% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1361 days | 18% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1481 days | 12% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1604 days | 8% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1726 days | 6% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1755 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1878 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1939 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1939 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2031 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2061 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2061 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2061 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2092 days | 5% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2092 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2120 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2120 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2182 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2182 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2212 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2243 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2243 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2243 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2306 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2426 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2430 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2485 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2529 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2638 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2745 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2867 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2870 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 2973 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3119 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3173 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3319 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3451 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3592 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3602 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3613 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3918 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3967 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4099 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4252 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4311 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4311 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4434 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4556 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4587 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4587 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4613 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4642 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4644 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4644 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4648 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4690 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4743 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4966 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4966 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 4991 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5001 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5012 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5025 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5073 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5297 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5354 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5361 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5450 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5457 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5463 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5578 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5578 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5624 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5701 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5713 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5713 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5730 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5733 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5746 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5748 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5754 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.73% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 135 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
132 | -2.67% |
133 | -2.69% |
134 | -2.71% |
135 | -2.73% |
136 | -2.75% |
137 | -2.77% |
138 | -2.79% |
… | … |
0.87% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.