Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
276 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 282 reviews. There are 276 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 276 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
18% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.21% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.21% and is based on 276 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 276 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Fredrik | 9/10 | 30 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 244 days | 98% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 275 days | 97% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 305 days | 96% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 336 days | 95% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 365 days | 93% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 365 days | 92% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 396 days | 92% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 488 days | 87% |
Chris | 8/10 | 488 days | 86% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 518 days | 80% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 610 days | 80% |
L&P | 8/10 | 641 days | 76% |
Alley | 10/10 | 641 days | 77% |
Josh | 9/10 | 671 days | 74% |
Niff | 10/10 | 702 days | 73% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 761 days | 68% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 792 days | 65% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 822 days | 61% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 822 days | 62% |
Evan | 10/10 | 822 days | 62% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 853 days | 59% |
Emily | 10/10 | 853 days | 59% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 853 days | 58% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 883 days | 56% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 883 days | 56% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 914 days | 53% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1310 days | 20% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1310 days | 20% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1432 days | 14% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1460 days | 12% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1552 days | 9% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1675 days | 6% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1797 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1826 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1949 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1979 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2010 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2010 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2102 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2132 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2132 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2132 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2163 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2163 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2191 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2191 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2253 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2377 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2497 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2501 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2528 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2528 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2583 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2586 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2600 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2816 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2849 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2938 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2950 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3010 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3210 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3244 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3304 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3318 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3390 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3663 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3683 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3774 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3990 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4040 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4055 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4079 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4079 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4170 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4437 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4455 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4460 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4460 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4460 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4505 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4627 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4684 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4700 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4708 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4711 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4713 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4715 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4715 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4719 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4722 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4728 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4728 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4728 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4728 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4729 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4729 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4730 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4730 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4732 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4734 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4742 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4742 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4743 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4744 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4744 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4759 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4759 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4761 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4814 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5062 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5072 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5075 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5075 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5084 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5092 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5094 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5097 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5101 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5105 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5106 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5175 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5236 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5236 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5363 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5367 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5368 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5445 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5451 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5463 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5471 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5484 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5509 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5534 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5548 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5649 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5666 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5754 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5772 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5784 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5784 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5801 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5804 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5817 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5818 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5818 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5825 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5831 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5852 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.12% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 6 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
3 | -0.06% |
4 | -0.08% |
5 | -0.10% |
6 | -0.12% |
7 | -0.14% |
8 | -0.17% |
9 | -0.19% |
… | … |
0.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.