G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.98%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 39 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 70 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 284 days | 97% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 315 days | 96% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 345 days | 94% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 376 days | 93% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 405 days | 92% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 405 days | 90% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 436 days | 90% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 528 days | 85% |
Chris | 8/10 | 528 days | 83% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 558 days | 78% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 650 days | 77% |
L&P | 8/10 | 681 days | 73% |
Alley | 10/10 | 681 days | 74% |
Josh | 9/10 | 711 days | 71% |
Niff | 10/10 | 742 days | 69% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 770 days | 67% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 770 days | 67% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 801 days | 64% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 832 days | 61% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 862 days | 57% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 862 days | 58% |
Evan | 10/10 | 862 days | 58% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 893 days | 55% |
Emily | 10/10 | 893 days | 55% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 893 days | 54% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 923 days | 52% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 923 days | 52% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 954 days | 49% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1350 days | 18% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1350 days | 18% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1472 days | 12% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1500 days | 11% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1592 days | 8% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1715 days | 6% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1837 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1866 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1989 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2019 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2050 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2050 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2142 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2172 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2172 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2172 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2203 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2203 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2231 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2231 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2293 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2417 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2537 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2596 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2623 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2640 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2856 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2978 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2981 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2990 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3050 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3084 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3284 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3309 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3344 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3358 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3430 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3476 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3724 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3815 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4030 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4078 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4080 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4088 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4095 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4210 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4394 days | 1% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4422 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4422 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4436 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4477 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4495 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4500 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4500 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4500 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4545 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4748 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4751 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4753 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4756 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4759 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4769 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4769 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4772 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4775 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4782 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4782 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4854 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5077 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5077 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5097 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5102 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5109 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5115 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5115 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5123 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5123 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5151 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5215 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5276 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5276 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5467 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5488 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5512 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5523 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5531 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5568 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5573 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5574 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5588 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5602 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5735 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5865 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5871 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5892 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.70% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 35 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
32 | -0.64% |
33 | -0.66% |
34 | -0.68% |
35 | -0.70% |
36 | -0.72% |
37 | -0.74% |
38 | -0.76% |
… | … |
0.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.