Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mad Campers.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mad Campers

Valid Reviews

77 Valid Reviews

The Mad Campers experience has a total of 81 reviews. There are 77 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
75%
9/10 15
19%
8/10 4
5%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

97.01% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mad Campers valid reviews is 97.01% and is based on 77 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

97.73%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Jimmy 10/10 406 days 100%
Ada 9/10 467 days 96%
Zoe Shipley 10/10 559 days 91%
Leigh Buckingham 10/10 864 days 63%
Alex Marinets 10/10 956 days 53%
Cory Spencer 10/10 1017 days 46%
Bobbie 10/10 1078 days 40%
Ace Metivier 10/10 1198 days 30%
Libby Simmonds 9/10 1835 days 4%
Diana 10/10 1836 days 4%
Franco Sabadini 9/10 1866 days 4%
louise peel 10/10 1898 days 4%
Brooke O'Connell 10/10 2081 days 4%
Ann Boekstegers 10/10 2172 days 4%
Kat Suddaby 10/10 2201 days 4%
Adam Mitchell 10/10 2201 days 4%
Alexander Ruhland 10/10 2232 days 4%
Silvere VERACRUZ 8/10 2232 days 3%
Lizzie Lacey-Brennan 9/10 2263 days 3%
Jonas Gemmel 10/10 2263 days 4%
Valerie LaCrosse 10/10 2293 days 3%
Laura Collins 10/10 2355 days 3%
Amandine CHATAIN 9/10 2385 days 3%
Justine Senée 9/10 2386 days 3%
Indra Prasetyo 10/10 2477 days 3%
SCOTT HASSLER 9/10 2477 days 3%
Summer Peterman 10/10 2478 days 3%
Lorrie Kaplan 10/10 2507 days 3%
Stephanie Hill 10/10 2507 days 3%
Will Johnson 10/10 2507 days 3%
Bob Bergman 10/10 2538 days 3%
Milena Tkotz 10/10 2538 days 3%
William Nash 10/10 2539 days 3%
Alan Whitlock 10/10 2539 days 3%
Sean Seguin 10/10 2566 days 3%
Chris Bollington 8/10 2566 days 3%
Sam Atkins 10/10 2567 days 3%
Laura Morley 10/10 2597 days 3%
Kristen Rodgers 10/10 2597 days 3%
fabien Lafond 9/10 2597 days 3%
Matthijs de Jong 10/10 2598 days 3%
Caroline Creekman 10/10 2628 days 3%
Julie Robinson 10/10 2628 days 3%
William Swann 10/10 2628 days 3%
Catherine Henry 10/10 2628 days 3%
Richard Arnot 10/10 2658 days 3%
Tety Kusuma Wardani Tety 9/10 2659 days 3%
Benjamin Becker 10/10 2659 days 3%
Marieke & Wieteke 10/10 2690 days 3%
Nurrin Akhyar Nurrinanuwar 9/10 2719 days 2%
James Campos 10/10 2751 days 2%
Fernando & Andrea 9/10 2751 days 2%
Andrew Korson 10/10 2782 days 2%
jarren Verbeek 10/10 2812 days 2%
Hamish Wedd 8/10 2873 days 2%
María Casanova 10/10 2873 days 2%
Janine Shaw 10/10 2903 days 2%
Karine 9/10 2904 days 2%
Maria Sol Fresard Disselkoen 10/10 2904 days 2%
Logan 10/10 2904 days 2%
Nick 10/10 2904 days 2%
Sandi Fukumoto 10/10 2931 days 2%
Theo and Rachel 10/10 2931 days 2%
Peter & Vicki 10/10 2932 days 2%
BoRoTravel 10/10 2932 days 2%
Stefano Muratore 10/10 2932 days 2%
Jane 10/10 2932 days 2%
Rick Karsten 10/10 2962 days 2%
Joel McDowell 10/10 2963 days 2%
Rogier van Hei 8/10 2963 days 2%
Hayley Diakiw 9/10 3023 days 2%
LIZ WATKINS 9/10 3023 days 2%
Olli-Pekka Heinimäki 10/10 3024 days 2%
Sam Pillidge 10/10 3084 days 2%
Jason Longhos 10/10 3084 days 2%
Nakita 10/10 3238 days 1%
Charles E Wilber 9/10 6280 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mad Campers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-7.15% Adjustment

Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.

What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 51 days. The Mad Campers experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:

Recent Reviews Adjustment
0 -3.00%
1 -2.63%
2 -1.50%
3 -0.38%
4 -0.00%

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mad Campers experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.09%
198 -4.11%
199 -4.13%
200 -4.15%
201 -4.18%
202 -4.20%
203 -4.22%

Balancing Adjustment

0.92% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Onboarding Rating

This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.

All metrics come from actual customer interactions.

Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.