G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cust Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cust Domain
Valid Reviews
45 Valid Reviews
The Cust Domain experience has a total of 45 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
73% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
92.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cust Domain valid reviews is 92.22% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
93.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellen | 9/10 | 95 days | 99% |
| Nancy Campbell | 10/10 | 125 days | 100% |
| Hayley | 10/10 | 217 days | 98% |
| FRANDS | 10/10 | 217 days | 98% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 339 days | 92% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 339 days | 93% |
| Philipp | 10/10 | 430 days | 90% |
| Ciara Jo | 10/10 | 491 days | 87% |
| Leon | 10/10 | 491 days | 87% |
| Sandrine Wandelburg | 10/10 | 705 days | 71% |
| Mini-K | 10/10 | 736 days | 69% |
| Mylène | 10/10 | 856 days | 57% |
| Graham Thompson | 6/10 | 856 days | 49% |
| Tony | 7/10 | 887 days | 50% |
| Richie | 10/10 | 917 days | 51% |
| TK | 1/10 | 917 days | 19% |
| Liz | 10/10 | 1160 days | 28% |
| CCMAS | 10/10 | 1252 days | 22% |
| Johnboy | 9/10 | 1252 days | 21% |
| Cory and Tarah | 10/10 | 1282 days | 20% |
| Lisa Boag | 10/10 | 1344 days | 16% |
| Linda Campbell | 10/10 | 1405 days | 13% |
| Valg | 10/10 | 1494 days | 9% |
| Eloise | 10/10 | 1525 days | 7% |
| Jan Filipcik | 10/10 | 1860 days | 2% |
| Lua | 10/10 | 1922 days | 2% |
| Elizabeth | 10/10 | 1922 days | 2% |
| Sita | 10/10 | 1922 days | 2% |
| Brandon | 10/10 | 1922 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1952 days | 2% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 2013 days | 2% |
| Michael K. | 10/10 | 2136 days | 2% |
| Babyinplug | 8/10 | 2256 days | 1% |
| Niki | 10/10 | 2256 days | 1% |
| Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2256 days | 1% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 2287 days | 1% |
| Daniel P | 10/10 | 2287 days | 1% |
| Boa | 5/10 | 2409 days | 0% |
| Rachel | 10/10 | 2440 days | 1% |
| Loic Morvan | 9/10 | 2501 days | 1% |
| Christina | 7/10 | 2531 days | 0% |
| John Griffith | 10/10 | 2590 days | 1% |
| Mick Havill | 7/10 | 2626 days | 0% |
| Jon Harris | 10/10 | 2657 days | 0% |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 10/10 | 2732 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cust Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.62% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.