Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 71 |
|
54% |
9/10 | 40 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
113 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 58 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
94.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Margaret | 10/10 | 1389 days | 100% |
ILDIKO JUHASZ | 10/10 | 1389 days | 100% |
Sandra Reynders | 10/10 | 2909 days | 18% |
Jessica Nasstrom | 10/10 | 2941 days | 17% |
Matt Harris | 9/10 | 3166 days | 14% |
Nadja Guiliani | 9/10 | 3167 days | 14% |
Laerke Soee | 10/10 | 3174 days | 14% |
Christian Krause | 10/10 | 3174 days | 14% |
Philipp | 8/10 | 3176 days | 14% |
Matt Irwin | 9/10 | 3197 days | 14% |
Tom Hurst | 9/10 | 3197 days | 14% |
Luca Herzig | 10/10 | 3202 days | 14% |
Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3205 days | 14% |
Lennox | 10/10 | 3206 days | 14% |
Philip Piel | 10/10 | 3226 days | 14% |
Jonas | 10/10 | 3226 days | 14% |
Mikkel Palleson | 10/10 | 3228 days | 14% |
Asborn Damgaard | 7/10 | 3233 days | 13% |
Hans | 9/10 | 3258 days | 13% |
Raviv Regev | 8/10 | 3258 days | 13% |
Sophie Jenkins | 10/10 | 3279 days | 13% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3914 days | 5% |
Rhys Williams | 7/10 | 3942 days | 4% |
Ruth Watkin | 10/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Jake Bell | 9/10 | 3977 days | 4% |
Annika | 6/10 | 4287 days | 0% |
Courtney Quintrell | 8/10 | 4290 days | 0% |
Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4293 days | 0% |
Christina Rodewald | 9/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
Jens Moller | 10/10 | 4641 days | 6% |
Yves & Sylvia | 10/10 | 4662 days | 6% |
Nelly & Lisa | 9/10 | 4664 days | 6% |
Franziska & Katrin | 9/10 | 4669 days | 6% |
Graham Swinyard | 8/10 | 4671 days | 5% |
Asha | 10/10 | 4708 days | 6% |
dally | 10/10 | 4953 days | 6% |
Ryan_Packer | 10/10 | 4953 days | 6% |
Stefanny Ling | 9/10 | 4979 days | 6% |
carol50 | 10/10 | 4983 days | 6% |
Kate Morgan | 10/10 | 5002 days | 6% |
Ann-Katrine & Sille | 8/10 | 5012 days | 5% |
Leslie Aldridge | 4/10 | 5035 days | 3% |
Clamdine | 9/10 | 5037 days | 6% |
Hull | 10/10 | 5037 days | 6% |
Family_Thomsen | 10/10 | 5361 days | 6% |
Will Jemma | 10/10 | 5392 days | 6% |
Martÿn Steenvoorden | 9/10 | 5399 days | 6% |
Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5402 days | 6% |
John-Paul | 8/10 | 5407 days | 5% |
stroalki | 9/10 | 5438 days | 6% |
biene | 3/10 | 5453 days | 3% |
jamesg | 9/10 | 5467 days | 6% |
Mille Winther | 6/10 | 5480 days | 5% |
Matty Boombatty | 10/10 | 5530 days | 6% |
Neil | 10/10 | 5641 days | 6% |
michellew | 8/10 | 5661 days | 5% |
BryonyS | 10/10 | 5701 days | 6% |
KatieR | 9/10 | 5711 days | 6% |
Sally477 | 10/10 | 5714 days | 6% |
Katy1 | 8/10 | 5715 days | 5% |
ElissaH | 10/10 | 5716 days | 6% |
Paul | 7/10 | 5717 days | 5% |
AnneliesK | 9/10 | 5723 days | 6% |
Jon Li | 10/10 | 5725 days | 6% |
EleanorL | 10/10 | 5746 days | 6% |
VickiS | 9/10 | 5746 days | 6% |
soccaplaya14 | 10/10 | 5753 days | 6% |
kiwibrit86 | 10/10 | 5757 days | 6% |
StefanieW | 10/10 | 5763 days | 6% |
NinaH1 | 10/10 | 5763 days | 6% |
Noamiki | 9/10 | 5775 days | 6% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5777 days | 6% |
Alon | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
Dan | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
Sabrina | 10/10 | 5779 days | 6% |
Kelly | 10/10 | 5780 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5780 days | 6% |
swizzler | 10/10 | 5783 days | 6% |
Lieke | 9/10 | 5786 days | 6% |
Ans | 10/10 | 5787 days | 6% |
Alan | 10/10 | 5792 days | 6% |
Emory | 8/10 | 5798 days | 5% |
Bonnie Turner | 9/10 | 5803 days | 6% |
Evi | 10/10 | 5819 days | 6% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5832 days | 6% |
Tim | 10/10 | 5834 days | 6% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5854 days | 6% |
Clare | 9/10 | 5880 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5889 days | 6% |
Jimmy | 9/10 | 5911 days | 6% |
Charlotte | 9/10 | 5924 days | 6% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 5933 days | 6% |
Naki_Girlz | 10/10 | 6044 days | 6% |
L1z4rd | 10/10 | 6044 days | 6% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6083 days | 6% |
Joanne M | 9/10 | 6089 days | 6% |
Anna | 9/10 | 6090 days | 6% |
Julie | 8/10 | 6093 days | 5% |
Claire | 10/10 | 6099 days | 6% |
Sarah Maudsley | 9/10 | 6099 days | 6% |
Kelly Noirin | 9/10 | 6100 days | 6% |
Laurie | 8/10 | 6124 days | 5% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6125 days | 6% |
Katharina | 9/10 | 6125 days | 6% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6126 days | 6% |
Orlaith | 10/10 | 6126 days | 6% |
Marc Hertogs | 10/10 | 6129 days | 6% |
Stephanie Jones | 10/10 | 6153 days | 6% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6153 days | 6% |
Tim | 10/10 | 6153 days | 6% |
Aske Helbor | 10/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
ranker_734 | 10/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
Martin Nigschit | 8/10 | 6187 days | 5% |
marion | 9/10 | 6194 days | 6% |
Michelle Orr | 10/10 | 6195 days | 6% |
Kevin | 10/10 | 6198 days | 6% |
dieter | 9/10 | 6201 days | 6% |
Pete | 10/10 | 6202 days | 6% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6203 days | 6% |
Richard Kindgren | 10/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
Jessica Callen | 10/10 | 6315 days | 6% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 6425 days | 6% |
Will | 9/10 | 6429 days | 6% |
ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6434 days | 6% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 6434 days | 6% |
Kitsu | 10/10 | 6437 days | 6% |
Valerie | 5/10 | 6440 days | 4% |
Janning | 8/10 | 6449 days | 5% |
Kim Holland | 10/10 | 6449 days | 6% |
Sean | 10/10 | 6453 days | 6% |
Mary | 10/10 | 6464 days | 6% |
PamWalter | 10/10 | 6490 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
0.94% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.