Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.40%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1864 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1864 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3384 days 32%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3416 days 31%
Matt Harris 9/10 3641 days 20%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3642 days 20%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3649 days 20%
Christian Krause 10/10 3649 days 20%
Philipp 8/10 3651 days 19%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3672 days 19%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3672 days 19%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3677 days 19%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3680 days 19%
Lennox 10/10 3681 days 19%
Philip Piel 10/10 3701 days 18%
Jonas 10/10 3701 days 18%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3703 days 18%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3708 days 16%
Hans 9/10 3733 days 16%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3733 days 16%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3754 days 16%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4389 days 10%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4417 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4417 days 10%
Jake Bell 9/10 4452 days 10%
Annika 6/10 4762 days 7%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4765 days 10%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4768 days 10%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4791 days 10%
Jens Moller 10/10 5116 days 10%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5137 days 10%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5139 days 10%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5144 days 10%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5146 days 10%
Asha 10/10 5183 days 10%
dally 10/10 5428 days 10%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5428 days 10%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5454 days 10%
carol50 10/10 5458 days 10%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5477 days 10%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5487 days 10%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5510 days 2%
Clamdine 9/10 5512 days 10%
Hull 10/10 5512 days 10%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5836 days 10%
Will Jemma 10/10 5867 days 10%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5874 days 10%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5877 days 10%
John-Paul 8/10 5882 days 10%
stroalki 9/10 5913 days 10%
biene 3/10 5928 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 5942 days 10%
Mille Winther 6/10 5955 days 7%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6005 days 10%
Neil 10/10 6116 days 10%
michellew 8/10 6136 days 10%
BryonyS 10/10 6176 days 10%
KatieR 9/10 6186 days 10%
Sally477 10/10 6189 days 10%
Katy1 8/10 6190 days 10%
ElissaH 10/10 6191 days 10%
Paul 7/10 6192 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6198 days 10%
Jon Li 10/10 6200 days 10%
EleanorL 10/10 6221 days 10%
VickiS 9/10 6221 days 10%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6228 days 10%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6232 days 10%
StefanieW 10/10 6238 days 10%
NinaH1 10/10 6238 days 10%
Noamiki 9/10 6251 days 10%
Michael 10/10 6252 days 10%
Alon 10/10 6253 days 10%
Dan 10/10 6253 days 10%
Sabrina 10/10 6255 days 10%
Kelly 10/10 6255 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6256 days 10%
swizzler 10/10 6258 days 10%
Lieke 9/10 6261 days 10%
Ans 10/10 6262 days 10%
Alan 10/10 6267 days 10%
Emory 8/10 6273 days 10%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6278 days 10%
Evi 10/10 6294 days 10%
Christian 10/10 6307 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6309 days 10%
Ben 10/10 6329 days 10%
Clare 9/10 6355 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6364 days 10%
Jimmy 9/10 6386 days 10%
Charlotte 9/10 6399 days 10%
Fiona 9/10 6408 days 10%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6519 days 10%
L1z4rd 10/10 6519 days 10%
Mark 9/10 6558 days 10%
Joanne M 9/10 6564 days 10%
Anna 9/10 6565 days 10%
Julie 8/10 6568 days 10%
Claire 10/10 6574 days 10%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6574 days 10%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6575 days 10%
Laurie 8/10 6599 days 10%
Stephanie 10/10 6600 days 10%
Katharina 9/10 6600 days 10%
Maree 9/10 6601 days 10%
Orlaith 10/10 6601 days 10%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6604 days 10%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6628 days 10%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6628 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6628 days 10%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6631 days 10%
ranker_734 10/10 6631 days 10%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6662 days 10%
marion 9/10 6669 days 10%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6670 days 10%
Kevin 10/10 6673 days 10%
dieter 9/10 6676 days 10%
Pete 10/10 6677 days 10%
Orla 9/10 6678 days 10%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6680 days 10%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6790 days 10%
Sabine 9/10 6900 days 10%
Will 9/10 6904 days 10%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6909 days 10%
Elaine 10/10 6909 days 10%
Kitsu 10/10 6912 days 10%
Valerie 5/10 6915 days 5%
Janning 8/10 6924 days 10%
Kim Holland 10/10 6924 days 10%
Sean 10/10 6928 days 10%
Mary 10/10 6939 days 10%
PamWalter 10/10 6965 days 10%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.03% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.97%
198 -3.99%
199 -4.01%
200 -4.03%
201 -4.05%
202 -4.07%
203 -4.09%

Balancing Adjustment

1.09% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.