Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour

Valid Reviews

90 Valid Reviews

The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 95 reviews. There are 90 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 90 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 25
28%
9/10 28
31%
8/10 25
28%
7/10 8
9%
6/10 3
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

86.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 86.33% and is based on 90 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.60%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Pat 8/10 30 days 100%
Ro 7/10 61 days 95%
Milly Struthers 8/10 152 days 99%
Franzi 9/10 244 days 98%
Hazel 9/10 305 days 96%
Elise 7/10 305 days 90%
Emeline 9/10 305 days 96%
Pluto 9/10 305 days 96%
Max 6/10 336 days 82%
Rya 10/10 365 days 94%
Charlie 9/10 396 days 92%
Celia 9/10 457 days 89%
Phoebe 6/10 457 days 77%
Joe 10/10 488 days 88%
Anja 9/10 518 days 85%
Berthe 9/10 549 days 83%
Mo 10/10 580 days 82%
Nic 8/10 610 days 78%
Hugo 8/10 641 days 76%
Taylor Russell 9/10 641 days 77%
Sarah Lange 8/10 641 days 76%
Paul 10/10 641 days 77%
Zack 10/10 671 days 75%
Elizabeth Keller 9/10 671 days 74%
Sam 10/10 671 days 75%
MC 8/10 702 days 71%
Roxie 9/10 702 days 72%
Guenter 8/10 730 days 69%
Mickey Smillie 7/10 730 days 65%
Paige Hayward 1/10 792 days 24%
Audrey & Jake 8/10 853 days 57%
Lauren 10/10 853 days 59%
Steven 9/10 883 days 55%
Stefanie 8/10 914 days 51%
Leyna H. 8/10 1006 days 42%
Jordan 8/10 1036 days 39%
Jazzy 9/10 1067 days 36%
Hugh 9/10 1095 days 34%
Tee 10/10 1126 days 32%
Alex 9/10 1157 days 29%
Gab 8/10 1157 days 28%
Natalie Perrett 10/10 1340 days 16%
Jackie 10/10 1340 days 16%
Bluescruize 9/10 1491 days 9%
Vanessa 8/10 1491 days 9%
Shannon 10/10 1583 days 6%
Ellefree 10/10 1675 days 4%
Gaël 10/10 1826 days 2%
Mona 8/10 1857 days 2%
Sabine 9/10 1857 days 2%
Backpack On Fire 10/10 1857 days 2%
Abraca 10/10 1888 days 2%
Rachelle 8/10 1888 days 2%
Lauren Cottle 8/10 1918 days 2%
Bert 6/10 1918 days 1%
Sean 8/10 1949 days 2%
Mike Sc 9/10 1949 days 2%
Suzanne J 8/10 1979 days 2%
Charlotte 7/10 2041 days 2%
Margaret Robinson 10/10 2102 days 2%
Jeff 10/10 2132 days 2%
Ryan 9/10 2163 days 2%
Matthias 7/10 2191 days 1%
Mona 10/10 2191 days 2%
Caro Del 10/10 2191 days 2%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2191 days 1%
Flatlanders 8/10 2222 days 1%
Dirk Taubner 8/10 2253 days 1%
Sharona de Bruijn 10/10 2283 days 1%
Jude 10/10 2283 days 1%
Markus 9/10 2283 days 1%
Hyemin Park 9/10 2314 days 1%
john hambly 9/10 2314 days 1%
Kimberly 10/10 2344 days 1%
Amy 7/10 2344 days 1%
blogspot.westwardgo.com 9/10 2375 days 1%
Joseph 8/10 2406 days 1%
Antoine 8/10 2406 days 1%
Marcus Wyatt 8/10 2467 days 1%
Ryan 8/10 2467 days 1%
Juliane 10/10 2467 days 1%
Isabel van Megen 10/10 2528 days 1%
Fabian Hock 8/10 2540 days 1%
Shen Heng 9/10 2601 days 1%
richard maguire 7/10 2630 days 0%
Joe Trigg 9/10 2642 days 1%
Phil and Mel Rowson 9/10 2645 days 1%
Cathy Riley 9/10 2646 days 1%
Nathan Bosia 10/10 2700 days 0%
Silvana Pintao 7/10 2828 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.71% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.