Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hukafalls Jet Taupo.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Hukafalls Jet Taupo

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
33%
9/10 20
25%
8/10 21
26%
7/10 6
8%
6/10 4
5%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.75% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo valid reviews is 85.75% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

63 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
27%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 16
25%
7/10 6
10%
6/10 4
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.76% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo face-to-face reviews is 84.76% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.04%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Alan 10/10 183 days 100%
Les Hendy 10/10 3022 days 3%
Mauricio Daniele 9/10 3310 days 2%
Marilyn and Steffen 8/10 3367 days 2%
Lea Karl 5/10 3701 days 1%
Franz Birkefeld 6/10 3968 days 1%
Petr Dvorak 9/10 4360 days 0%
Jes Paulsen 9/10 4433 days 1%
Siegfried Richter 10/10 4729 days 1%
Grahame MacKay 8/10 4740 days 1%
Tim Clark 8/10 4747 days 1%
Steve Neilson 10/10 4817 days 1%
Stefanny Ling 7/10 5050 days 1%
Kate Morgan 9/10 5073 days 1%
Andy Johnson 9/10 5076 days 1%
Shirley 10/10 5083 days 1%
Belony 10/10 5100 days 1%
Tayler Gray 8/10 5100 days 1%
Harriet Banes 9/10 5104 days 1%
Lynn Leitch 9/10 5106 days 1%
Stephen Leitch 10/10 5106 days 1%
Jane Hancock 10/10 5108 days 1%
katiec82 10/10 5297 days 1%
thomo182 10/10 5389 days 1%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5432 days 1%
Gerhard Kronen 9/10 5447 days 1%
Susiekj 10/10 5450 days 1%
B Willmore 10/10 5452 days 1%
Mark and Natasha UK 9/10 5452 days 1%
Alzbeta Czech 10/10 5464 days 1%
Tanja Titze 9/10 5471 days 1%
Caitriona Doyle 3/10 5472 days 1%
Toni 8/10 5472 days 1%
Arne van Schol 7/10 5474 days 1%
Sebastian Kramer 8/10 5484 days 1%
pedawrds 10/10 5529 days 1%
Steven Walsh 8/10 5548 days 1%
Holly 8/10 5601 days 1%
trvlbug 10/10 5693 days 1%
Kirsten Stewart 9/10 5723 days 1%
IRLJohnny 4/10 5754 days 1%
Debra-anne Signal 10/10 5754 days 1%
suet 9/10 5784 days 1%
Nick 10/10 5800 days 1%
John 10/10 5827 days 1%
Bobby 10/10 5833 days 1%
niall stephenson 8/10 5847 days 1%
Ko 8/10 5848 days 1%
Kelly 8/10 5850 days 1%
Patricia 8/10 5852 days 1%
Cindy 7/10 5897 days 1%
Paul 9/10 5901 days 1%
rustytrombone 8/10 5935 days 1%
Louise 9/10 5947 days 1%
Michelle 9/10 5958 days 1%
Atsuko 8/10 5990 days 1%
Bronagh Mcartan 7/10 6032 days 1%
Naki_Girlz 8/10 6114 days 1%
L1z4rd 8/10 6114 days 1%
Liz Brown 10/10 6120 days 1%
Hoetnagels 8/10 6167 days 1%
RhysP 7/10 6169 days 1%
James Davies 10/10 6176 days 1%
Richard Steward 10/10 6181 days 1%
Silvia 7/10 6181 days 1%
Stacy Gould 10/10 6184 days 1%
Sabine Feiner 9/10 6189 days 1%
lawrence Walker 8/10 6258 days 1%
FrankOosterwijk 8/10 6471 days 1%
Bonnie 9/10 6494 days 1%
Clive 9/10 6500 days 1%
Kitsu 9/10 6508 days 1%
Mike Shirley 8/10 6512 days 1%
Fred Highsmith 8/10 6514 days 1%
Roran 6/10 6531 days 1%
Elena Babitcheva 10/10 6531 days 1%
Mary 6/10 6535 days 1%
Didier 6/10 6558 days 1%
Rolf 10/10 6562 days 1%
Nicole 9/10 6562 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.39% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has been adjusted for 164 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
161 -3.33%
162 -3.35%
163 -3.37%
164 -3.39%
165 -3.42%
166 -3.44%
167 -3.46%

Balancing Adjustment

0.92% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.