Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hukafalls Jet Taupo.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Hukafalls Jet Taupo

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
33%
9/10 20
25%
8/10 21
26%
7/10 6
8%
6/10 4
5%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.75% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo valid reviews is 85.75% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

63 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
27%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 16
25%
7/10 6
10%
6/10 4
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.76% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo face-to-face reviews is 84.76% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.04%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Alan 10/10 112 days 100%
Les Hendy 10/10 2951 days 3%
Mauricio Daniele 9/10 3239 days 2%
Marilyn and Steffen 8/10 3296 days 2%
Lea Karl 5/10 3630 days 1%
Franz Birkefeld 6/10 3897 days 1%
Petr Dvorak 9/10 4289 days 0%
Jes Paulsen 9/10 4362 days 0%
Siegfried Richter 10/10 4658 days 1%
Grahame MacKay 8/10 4669 days 1%
Tim Clark 8/10 4676 days 1%
Steve Neilson 10/10 4746 days 1%
Stefanny Ling 7/10 4979 days 1%
Kate Morgan 9/10 5002 days 1%
Andy Johnson 9/10 5005 days 1%
Shirley 10/10 5012 days 1%
Belony 10/10 5029 days 1%
Tayler Gray 8/10 5029 days 1%
Harriet Banes 9/10 5033 days 1%
Lynn Leitch 9/10 5035 days 1%
Stephen Leitch 10/10 5035 days 1%
Jane Hancock 10/10 5037 days 1%
katiec82 10/10 5226 days 1%
thomo182 10/10 5318 days 1%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5361 days 1%
Gerhard Kronen 9/10 5376 days 1%
Susiekj 10/10 5379 days 1%
B Willmore 10/10 5381 days 1%
Mark and Natasha UK 9/10 5381 days 1%
Alzbeta Czech 10/10 5393 days 1%
Tanja Titze 9/10 5400 days 1%
Caitriona Doyle 3/10 5401 days 1%
Toni 8/10 5401 days 1%
Arne van Schol 7/10 5403 days 1%
Sebastian Kramer 8/10 5413 days 1%
pedawrds 10/10 5458 days 1%
Steven Walsh 8/10 5477 days 1%
Holly 8/10 5530 days 1%
trvlbug 10/10 5622 days 1%
Kirsten Stewart 9/10 5652 days 1%
IRLJohnny 4/10 5683 days 1%
Debra-anne Signal 10/10 5683 days 1%
suet 9/10 5713 days 1%
Nick 10/10 5730 days 1%
John 10/10 5757 days 1%
Bobby 10/10 5762 days 1%
niall stephenson 8/10 5777 days 1%
Ko 8/10 5778 days 1%
Kelly 8/10 5780 days 1%
Patricia 8/10 5782 days 1%
Cindy 7/10 5827 days 1%
Paul 9/10 5831 days 1%
rustytrombone 8/10 5864 days 1%
Louise 9/10 5877 days 1%
Michelle 9/10 5888 days 1%
Atsuko 8/10 5920 days 1%
Bronagh Mcartan 7/10 5962 days 1%
Naki_Girlz 8/10 6044 days 1%
L1z4rd 8/10 6044 days 1%
Liz Brown 10/10 6050 days 1%
Hoetnagels 8/10 6096 days 1%
RhysP 7/10 6098 days 1%
James Davies 10/10 6105 days 1%
Richard Steward 10/10 6110 days 1%
Silvia 7/10 6110 days 1%
Stacy Gould 10/10 6114 days 1%
Sabine Feiner 9/10 6118 days 1%
lawrence Walker 8/10 6187 days 1%
FrankOosterwijk 8/10 6400 days 1%
Bonnie 9/10 6423 days 1%
Clive 9/10 6429 days 1%
Kitsu 9/10 6437 days 1%
Mike Shirley 8/10 6441 days 1%
Fred Highsmith 8/10 6443 days 1%
Roran 6/10 6460 days 1%
Elena Babitcheva 10/10 6460 days 1%
Mary 6/10 6464 days 1%
Didier 6/10 6487 days 1%
Rolf 10/10 6491 days 1%
Nicole 9/10 6491 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-1.90% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has been adjusted for 94 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
91 -1.84%
92 -1.86%
93 -1.88%
94 -1.90%
95 -1.92%
96 -1.94%
97 -1.96%

Balancing Adjustment

0.73% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

93%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.