Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Hukafalls Jet Taupo.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Hukafalls Jet Taupo

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
33%
9/10 20
25%
8/10 21
26%
7/10 6
8%
6/10 4
5%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.75% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo valid reviews is 85.75% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

63 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
27%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 16
25%
7/10 6
10%
6/10 4
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.76% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Hukafalls Jet Taupo face-to-face reviews is 84.76% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.02%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Alan 10/10 223 days 100%
Les Hendy 10/10 3062 days 2%
Mauricio Daniele 9/10 3350 days 2%
Marilyn and Steffen 8/10 3407 days 1%
Lea Karl 5/10 3741 days 0%
Franz Birkefeld 6/10 4008 days 0%
Petr Dvorak 9/10 4400 days 0%
Jes Paulsen 9/10 4473 days 0%
Siegfried Richter 10/10 4769 days 0%
Grahame MacKay 8/10 4780 days 0%
Tim Clark 8/10 4787 days 0%
Steve Neilson 10/10 4857 days 0%
Stefanny Ling 7/10 5090 days 0%
Kate Morgan 9/10 5113 days 0%
Andy Johnson 9/10 5116 days 0%
Shirley 10/10 5123 days 0%
Belony 10/10 5140 days 0%
Tayler Gray 8/10 5140 days 0%
Harriet Banes 9/10 5144 days 0%
Lynn Leitch 9/10 5146 days 0%
Stephen Leitch 10/10 5146 days 0%
Jane Hancock 10/10 5148 days 0%
katiec82 10/10 5337 days 0%
thomo182 10/10 5429 days 0%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5472 days 0%
Gerhard Kronen 9/10 5487 days 0%
Susiekj 10/10 5490 days 0%
B Willmore 10/10 5492 days 0%
Mark and Natasha UK 9/10 5492 days 0%
Alzbeta Czech 10/10 5504 days 0%
Tanja Titze 9/10 5511 days 0%
Caitriona Doyle 3/10 5512 days 0%
Toni 8/10 5512 days 0%
Arne van Schol 7/10 5514 days 0%
Sebastian Kramer 8/10 5524 days 0%
pedawrds 10/10 5569 days 0%
Steven Walsh 8/10 5588 days 0%
Holly 8/10 5641 days 0%
trvlbug 10/10 5733 days 0%
Kirsten Stewart 9/10 5763 days 0%
IRLJohnny 4/10 5794 days 0%
Debra-anne Signal 10/10 5794 days 0%
suet 9/10 5824 days 0%
Nick 10/10 5841 days 0%
John 10/10 5868 days 0%
Bobby 10/10 5873 days 0%
niall stephenson 8/10 5888 days 0%
Ko 8/10 5889 days 0%
Kelly 8/10 5890 days 0%
Patricia 8/10 5892 days 0%
Cindy 7/10 5938 days 0%
Paul 9/10 5941 days 0%
rustytrombone 8/10 5975 days 0%
Louise 9/10 5988 days 0%
Michelle 9/10 5998 days 0%
Atsuko 8/10 6031 days 0%
Bronagh Mcartan 7/10 6073 days 0%
Naki_Girlz 8/10 6155 days 0%
L1z4rd 8/10 6155 days 0%
Liz Brown 10/10 6161 days 0%
Hoetnagels 8/10 6207 days 0%
RhysP 7/10 6209 days 0%
James Davies 10/10 6216 days 0%
Richard Steward 10/10 6221 days 0%
Silvia 7/10 6221 days 0%
Stacy Gould 10/10 6225 days 0%
Sabine Feiner 9/10 6229 days 0%
lawrence Walker 8/10 6298 days 0%
FrankOosterwijk 8/10 6511 days 0%
Bonnie 9/10 6534 days 0%
Clive 9/10 6540 days 0%
Kitsu 9/10 6548 days 0%
Mike Shirley 8/10 6552 days 0%
Fred Highsmith 8/10 6554 days 0%
Roran 6/10 6571 days 0%
Elena Babitcheva 10/10 6571 days 0%
Mary 6/10 6575 days 0%
Didier 6/10 6598 days 0%
Rolf 10/10 6602 days 0%
Nicole 9/10 6602 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.02% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Hukafalls Jet Taupo experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.96%
198 -3.98%
199 -4.00%
200 -4.02%
201 -4.04%
202 -4.06%
203 -4.08%

Balancing Adjustment

1.00% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.