Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2231 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 3010 days | 81% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 3013 days | 97% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 3013 days | 95% |
Tome | 8/10 | 3036 days | 93% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3296 days | 66% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3334 days | 69% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3343 days | 67% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3389 days | 65% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3391 days | 63% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3633 days | 43% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3654 days | 41% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3704 days | 34% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3919 days | 20% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 4008 days | 12% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 4013 days | 11% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4024 days | 10% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4026 days | 11% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 4027 days | 9% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4051 days | 9% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4079 days | 5% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4079 days | 5% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4150 days | 0% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4394 days | 24% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4395 days | 24% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4399 days | 21% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4402 days | 23% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4418 days | 24% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4423 days | 24% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4454 days | 24% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4454 days | 24% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4729 days | 24% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4752 days | 18% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4756 days | 21% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4770 days | 24% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4772 days | 24% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4773 days | 24% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4774 days | 24% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4777 days | 9% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4782 days | 18% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4784 days | 24% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4788 days | 23% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4858 days | 24% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4860 days | 23% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4860 days | 9% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4867 days | 24% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4881 days | 4% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5112 days | 24% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5115 days | 23% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5116 days | 24% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5117 days | 24% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5123 days | 21% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5125 days | 14% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5130 days | 23% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5131 days | 23% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5141 days | 24% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5142 days | 24% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5146 days | 24% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5149 days | 24% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5150 days | 4% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5153 days | 24% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5153 days | 24% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5216 days | 24% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5246 days | 23% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5478 days | 23% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5482 days | 23% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5494 days | 18% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5505 days | 24% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5512 days | 23% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5525 days | 24% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5533 days | 24% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5566 days | 24% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5579 days | 23% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5585 days | 24% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5585 days | 24% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5585 days | 24% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5593 days | 21% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5596 days | 21% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5604 days | 23% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5733 days | 4% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5794 days | 24% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5818 days | 23% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5821 days | 18% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5822 days | 23% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5830 days | 14% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5832 days | 24% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5842 days | 24% |
david | 9/10 | 5842 days | 24% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5849 days | 24% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5849 days | 24% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5849 days | 24% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5856 days | 1% |
IM | 8/10 | 5856 days | 23% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5858 days | 21% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5858 days | 21% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5858 days | 14% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5858 days | 18% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5858 days | 18% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5858 days | 23% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5859 days | 18% |
John | 8/10 | 5861 days | 23% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5866 days | 14% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5866 days | 23% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5870 days | 14% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5873 days | 24% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5875 days | 24% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5875 days | 23% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5880 days | 21% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5887 days | 24% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5887 days | 24% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5887 days | 24% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5888 days | 21% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5891 days | 24% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5891 days | 24% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5893 days | 23% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5897 days | 9% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5912 days | 24% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5924 days | 24% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5929 days | 21% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5937 days | 24% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5943 days | 24% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5950 days | 24% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5956 days | 24% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5959 days | 24% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5965 days | 24% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5999 days | 21% |
Chris | 10/10 | 6000 days | 24% |
Lara | 9/10 | 6002 days | 24% |
Kay | 10/10 | 6004 days | 24% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 6011 days | 24% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 6034 days | 24% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6191 days | 4% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6201 days | 24% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6202 days | 24% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6209 days | 21% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6209 days | 23% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6211 days | 23% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6211 days | 24% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6211 days | 21% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6212 days | 24% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6216 days | 4% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6216 days | 23% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6217 days | 24% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6217 days | 24% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6218 days | 18% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6222 days | 24% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6224 days | 23% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6234 days | 24% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6234 days | 24% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6234 days | 24% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6238 days | 1% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6238 days | 24% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6238 days | 21% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6238 days | 24% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6239 days | 24% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6244 days | 14% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6264 days | 24% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6265 days | 24% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6265 days | 23% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6267 days | 24% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6268 days | 24% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6268 days | 24% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6272 days | 23% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6272 days | 4% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6273 days | 21% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6277 days | 23% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6296 days | 21% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6299 days | 23% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6306 days | 23% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6309 days | 24% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6315 days | 24% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6317 days | 21% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6426 days | 21% |
James | 8/10 | 6426 days | 23% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6514 days | 24% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6530 days | 23% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6531 days | 23% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6540 days | 23% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6540 days | 23% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6540 days | 24% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6542 days | 23% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6542 days | 21% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6542 days | 23% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6547 days | 21% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6547 days | 23% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6548 days | 24% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6548 days | 24% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6549 days | 23% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6551 days | 24% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6552 days | 23% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6554 days | 24% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6554 days | 23% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6561 days | 21% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6561 days | 21% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6561 days | 23% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6572 days | 24% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6580 days | 23% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6581 days | 24% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6581 days | 24% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6583 days | 23% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6595 days | 23% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6599 days | 9% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6601 days | 4% |
johan | 5/10 | 6608 days | 14% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6614 days | 24% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6616 days | 24% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8138 days | 9% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.01% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.95% |
198 | -3.97% |
199 | -3.99% |
200 | -4.01% |
201 | -4.03% |
202 | -4.05% |
203 | -4.07% |
… | … |
3.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.