Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2209 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2987 days | 85% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 2990 days | 98% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 2990 days | 96% |
Tome | 8/10 | 3013 days | 94% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3273 days | 73% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3311 days | 75% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3320 days | 73% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3367 days | 71% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3368 days | 70% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3611 days | 53% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3631 days | 52% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3681 days | 46% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3897 days | 34% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3985 days | 28% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 3990 days | 27% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4001 days | 26% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4003 days | 26% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 4004 days | 25% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4028 days | 25% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4056 days | 21% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4056 days | 21% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4127 days | 17% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4371 days | 1% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4395 days | 36% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4400 days | 36% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4431 days | 36% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4431 days | 36% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4706 days | 36% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4729 days | 31% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4733 days | 33% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4747 days | 36% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4749 days | 36% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4750 days | 36% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4751 days | 36% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4754 days | 23% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4759 days | 31% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4761 days | 36% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4765 days | 35% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4835 days | 36% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4837 days | 35% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4837 days | 23% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4844 days | 36% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4858 days | 20% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5089 days | 36% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5092 days | 35% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5093 days | 36% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5094 days | 36% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5100 days | 33% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5102 days | 27% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5107 days | 35% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5108 days | 35% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5118 days | 36% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5119 days | 36% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5122 days | 23% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5123 days | 36% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5126 days | 36% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5127 days | 20% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5130 days | 36% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5130 days | 36% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5193 days | 36% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5223 days | 35% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5455 days | 35% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5459 days | 35% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5471 days | 31% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5482 days | 36% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5489 days | 35% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5502 days | 36% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5510 days | 36% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5543 days | 36% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5556 days | 35% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5562 days | 36% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5562 days | 36% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5562 days | 36% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5570 days | 33% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5573 days | 33% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5581 days | 35% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5711 days | 20% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5772 days | 36% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5796 days | 35% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5798 days | 31% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5799 days | 35% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5807 days | 27% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5809 days | 36% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5819 days | 36% |
david | 9/10 | 5820 days | 36% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5827 days | 36% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5827 days | 36% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5827 days | 36% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5833 days | 16% |
IM | 8/10 | 5834 days | 35% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5835 days | 33% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5835 days | 33% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5835 days | 27% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5835 days | 31% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5835 days | 31% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5836 days | 35% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5836 days | 31% |
John | 8/10 | 5839 days | 35% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5843 days | 27% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5843 days | 35% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5847 days | 27% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5851 days | 36% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5853 days | 36% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5853 days | 35% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5857 days | 33% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5865 days | 36% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5865 days | 36% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5865 days | 36% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5866 days | 33% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5869 days | 36% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5869 days | 36% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5871 days | 35% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5875 days | 23% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5890 days | 36% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5902 days | 36% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5907 days | 33% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5915 days | 36% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5921 days | 36% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5928 days | 36% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5934 days | 36% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5937 days | 36% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5943 days | 36% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5977 days | 33% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5978 days | 36% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5980 days | 36% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5982 days | 36% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5989 days | 36% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 6012 days | 36% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6168 days | 20% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6178 days | 36% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6179 days | 36% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6186 days | 33% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6186 days | 35% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6188 days | 35% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6188 days | 36% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6188 days | 33% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6189 days | 36% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6193 days | 20% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6193 days | 35% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6194 days | 36% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6194 days | 36% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6195 days | 31% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6199 days | 36% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6201 days | 35% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6211 days | 36% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6211 days | 36% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6211 days | 36% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6215 days | 16% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6215 days | 36% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6215 days | 33% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6215 days | 36% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6217 days | 36% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6221 days | 27% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6241 days | 36% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6242 days | 36% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6242 days | 36% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6242 days | 36% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6242 days | 35% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6244 days | 36% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6245 days | 36% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6245 days | 36% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6249 days | 35% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6249 days | 20% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6250 days | 33% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6254 days | 35% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6273 days | 33% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6276 days | 35% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6283 days | 35% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6286 days | 36% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6292 days | 36% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6294 days | 33% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6404 days | 33% |
James | 8/10 | 6404 days | 35% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6492 days | 36% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6508 days | 35% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6509 days | 35% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6518 days | 35% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6518 days | 35% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6518 days | 36% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6520 days | 35% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6520 days | 33% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6520 days | 35% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6525 days | 33% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6525 days | 35% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6526 days | 36% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6526 days | 36% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6527 days | 35% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6529 days | 36% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6530 days | 35% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6532 days | 36% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6532 days | 35% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6539 days | 33% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6539 days | 33% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6539 days | 35% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6549 days | 36% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6557 days | 35% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6558 days | 36% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6558 days | 36% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6560 days | 35% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6572 days | 35% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6576 days | 23% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6578 days | 20% |
johan | 5/10 | 6585 days | 27% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6591 days | 36% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6593 days | 36% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8115 days | 23% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.09% |
198 | -4.11% |
199 | -4.13% |
200 | -4.15% |
201 | -4.17% |
202 | -4.19% |
203 | -4.21% |
… | … |
3.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.