Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.55%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2190 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2969 days | 85% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 2972 days | 98% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 2972 days | 96% |
Tome | 8/10 | 2995 days | 95% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3255 days | 73% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3293 days | 75% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3302 days | 74% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3348 days | 72% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3350 days | 70% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3592 days | 54% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3613 days | 52% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3663 days | 47% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3879 days | 35% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3967 days | 28% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 3972 days | 28% |
Laura | 8/10 | 3983 days | 27% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3985 days | 27% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 3986 days | 25% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4010 days | 25% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4038 days | 22% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4038 days | 22% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4109 days | 18% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4353 days | 2% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4354 days | 2% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4358 days | 1% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4361 days | 1% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4382 days | 36% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4413 days | 36% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4413 days | 36% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4688 days | 36% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4711 days | 31% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4715 days | 33% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4729 days | 36% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4731 days | 36% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4732 days | 36% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4733 days | 35% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4736 days | 23% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4741 days | 31% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4743 days | 36% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4747 days | 35% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4817 days | 36% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4819 days | 35% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4819 days | 23% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4826 days | 35% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4840 days | 19% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5071 days | 36% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5074 days | 35% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5075 days | 36% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5076 days | 35% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5082 days | 33% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5084 days | 27% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5089 days | 35% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5090 days | 35% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5100 days | 35% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5101 days | 35% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5104 days | 23% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5105 days | 35% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5108 days | 36% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5109 days | 19% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5112 days | 35% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5112 days | 35% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5175 days | 36% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5205 days | 35% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5437 days | 35% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5441 days | 35% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5453 days | 31% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5464 days | 35% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5471 days | 35% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5484 days | 36% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5492 days | 36% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5525 days | 35% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5538 days | 35% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5544 days | 35% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5544 days | 35% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5544 days | 36% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5552 days | 33% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5555 days | 33% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5563 days | 35% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5693 days | 19% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5754 days | 36% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5778 days | 35% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5780 days | 31% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5781 days | 35% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5789 days | 27% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5791 days | 35% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5801 days | 35% |
david | 9/10 | 5801 days | 35% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5808 days | 35% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5808 days | 36% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5808 days | 35% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5815 days | 16% |
IM | 8/10 | 5815 days | 35% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5817 days | 33% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5817 days | 33% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5817 days | 27% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5817 days | 31% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5817 days | 31% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5817 days | 35% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5818 days | 31% |
John | 8/10 | 5820 days | 35% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5825 days | 27% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5825 days | 35% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5829 days | 27% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5832 days | 35% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5834 days | 36% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5834 days | 35% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5839 days | 33% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5846 days | 36% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5846 days | 35% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5846 days | 36% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5847 days | 33% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5850 days | 36% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5850 days | 36% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5852 days | 35% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5856 days | 23% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5871 days | 36% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5883 days | 36% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5888 days | 33% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5896 days | 35% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5902 days | 35% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5909 days | 35% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5915 days | 36% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5918 days | 35% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5924 days | 36% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5958 days | 33% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5959 days | 36% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5961 days | 35% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5963 days | 36% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5970 days | 36% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 5993 days | 36% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6150 days | 19% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6160 days | 35% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6161 days | 36% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6168 days | 33% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6168 days | 35% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6170 days | 35% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6170 days | 36% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6170 days | 33% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6171 days | 35% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6175 days | 19% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6175 days | 35% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6176 days | 35% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6176 days | 35% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6177 days | 31% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6181 days | 36% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6183 days | 35% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6193 days | 35% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6193 days | 35% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6193 days | 35% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6197 days | 16% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6197 days | 35% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6197 days | 33% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6197 days | 35% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6199 days | 35% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6203 days | 27% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6223 days | 36% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6224 days | 35% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6224 days | 36% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6224 days | 35% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6224 days | 35% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6226 days | 35% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6227 days | 35% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6227 days | 35% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6231 days | 35% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6231 days | 19% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6232 days | 33% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6236 days | 35% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6255 days | 33% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6258 days | 35% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6265 days | 35% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6268 days | 35% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6274 days | 35% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6276 days | 33% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6386 days | 33% |
James | 8/10 | 6386 days | 35% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6474 days | 36% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6490 days | 35% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6491 days | 35% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6500 days | 35% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6500 days | 35% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6500 days | 35% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6502 days | 35% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6502 days | 33% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6502 days | 35% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6507 days | 33% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6507 days | 35% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6508 days | 35% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6508 days | 35% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6509 days | 35% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6511 days | 35% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6512 days | 35% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6514 days | 35% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6514 days | 35% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6521 days | 33% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6521 days | 33% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6521 days | 35% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6531 days | 35% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6539 days | 35% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6540 days | 36% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6540 days | 36% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6542 days | 35% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6554 days | 35% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6558 days | 23% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6560 days | 19% |
johan | 5/10 | 6567 days | 27% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6573 days | 36% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6575 days | 35% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8097 days | 23% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.14% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.08% |
198 | -4.10% |
199 | -4.12% |
200 | -4.14% |
201 | -4.16% |
202 | -4.18% |
203 | -4.20% |
… | … |
3.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.