Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.30%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2119 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2898 days | 86% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 2901 days | 100% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 2901 days | 98% |
Tome | 8/10 | 2924 days | 96% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3184 days | 75% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3222 days | 77% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3231 days | 76% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3277 days | 74% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3279 days | 72% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3521 days | 56% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3542 days | 54% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3592 days | 48% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3808 days | 37% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3896 days | 31% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 3901 days | 30% |
Laura | 8/10 | 3912 days | 29% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3914 days | 29% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 3915 days | 27% |
Libby | 9/10 | 3939 days | 28% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 3967 days | 24% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 3967 days | 24% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4038 days | 21% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4282 days | 4% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4283 days | 4% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4287 days | 3% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4290 days | 3% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4306 days | 2% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4311 days | 2% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4617 days | 33% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4640 days | 28% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4644 days | 30% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4658 days | 33% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4660 days | 33% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4661 days | 33% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4662 days | 32% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4665 days | 21% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4670 days | 28% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4672 days | 33% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4676 days | 32% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4746 days | 33% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4748 days | 32% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4748 days | 21% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4755 days | 32% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4769 days | 17% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5000 days | 33% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5003 days | 32% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5004 days | 33% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5005 days | 32% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5011 days | 30% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5013 days | 24% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5018 days | 32% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5019 days | 32% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5029 days | 32% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5030 days | 32% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5033 days | 21% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5034 days | 32% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5038 days | 17% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5041 days | 32% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5041 days | 32% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5104 days | 33% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5134 days | 32% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5366 days | 32% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5370 days | 32% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5382 days | 28% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5393 days | 32% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5400 days | 32% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5413 days | 33% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5421 days | 33% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5454 days | 32% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5467 days | 32% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5473 days | 32% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5473 days | 32% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5473 days | 33% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5481 days | 30% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5484 days | 30% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5492 days | 32% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5622 days | 17% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5683 days | 33% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5707 days | 32% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5709 days | 28% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5710 days | 32% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5718 days | 24% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5720 days | 32% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5730 days | 32% |
david | 9/10 | 5730 days | 32% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5737 days | 32% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5737 days | 33% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5737 days | 32% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5744 days | 14% |
IM | 8/10 | 5744 days | 32% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5746 days | 30% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5746 days | 30% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5746 days | 24% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5746 days | 28% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5746 days | 28% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5746 days | 32% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5747 days | 28% |
John | 8/10 | 5749 days | 32% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5754 days | 24% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5754 days | 32% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5758 days | 24% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5761 days | 32% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5763 days | 33% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5763 days | 32% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5768 days | 30% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5775 days | 33% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5775 days | 32% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5775 days | 33% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5776 days | 30% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5779 days | 33% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5779 days | 33% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5781 days | 32% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5785 days | 21% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5800 days | 33% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5812 days | 33% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5817 days | 30% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5826 days | 32% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5831 days | 32% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5838 days | 32% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5844 days | 33% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5847 days | 32% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5853 days | 33% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5887 days | 30% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5888 days | 33% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5890 days | 32% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5892 days | 33% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5899 days | 33% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 5922 days | 33% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6079 days | 17% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6089 days | 32% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6090 days | 33% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6097 days | 30% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6097 days | 32% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6099 days | 32% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6099 days | 33% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6099 days | 30% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6100 days | 32% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6104 days | 17% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6104 days | 32% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6105 days | 32% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6105 days | 32% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6106 days | 28% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6110 days | 33% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6112 days | 32% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6122 days | 32% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6122 days | 32% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6122 days | 32% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6126 days | 14% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6126 days | 32% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6126 days | 30% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6126 days | 32% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6128 days | 32% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6132 days | 24% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6152 days | 33% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6153 days | 32% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6153 days | 33% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6153 days | 32% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6153 days | 32% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6155 days | 32% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6156 days | 32% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6156 days | 32% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6160 days | 32% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6160 days | 17% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6161 days | 30% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6165 days | 32% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6184 days | 30% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6187 days | 32% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6194 days | 32% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6197 days | 32% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6203 days | 32% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6205 days | 30% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6315 days | 30% |
James | 8/10 | 6315 days | 32% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6403 days | 33% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6419 days | 32% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6420 days | 32% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6429 days | 32% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6429 days | 32% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6429 days | 32% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6431 days | 32% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6431 days | 30% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6431 days | 32% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6436 days | 30% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6436 days | 32% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6437 days | 32% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6437 days | 32% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6438 days | 32% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6440 days | 32% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6441 days | 32% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6443 days | 32% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6443 days | 32% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6450 days | 30% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6450 days | 30% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6450 days | 32% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6460 days | 32% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6468 days | 32% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6469 days | 33% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6469 days | 33% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6471 days | 32% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6483 days | 32% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6487 days | 21% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6489 days | 17% |
johan | 5/10 | 6496 days | 24% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6502 days | 33% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6504 days | 32% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8026 days | 21% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
3.83% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.