G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Akaroa Freedom Camping Area.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
73 Valid Reviews
The Akaroa Freedom Camping Area experience has a total of 75 reviews. There are 73 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 73 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 73 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
9/10 | 16 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 27 |
|
37% |
7/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
75.21% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Akaroa Freedom Camping Area valid reviews is 75.21% and is based on 73 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
78.59%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Anaïs | 6/10 | 52 days | 86% |
Shona | 9/10 | 82 days | 99% |
FRANDS | 5/10 | 113 days | 76% |
Charlee d | 10/10 | 113 days | 100% |
Ann | 8/10 | 266 days | 95% |
Jorian | 9/10 | 266 days | 96% |
Nina S. Larsen | 9/10 | 295 days | 95% |
Clembribri | 7/10 | 326 days | 88% |
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 3/10 | 387 days | 49% |
Marie Perret | 8/10 | 448 days | 87% |
Jodie Muller | 5/10 | 571 days | 62% |
Amy Catley | 8/10 | 571 days | 80% |
Jasmin | 8/10 | 632 days | 76% |
Tom | 7/10 | 691 days | 68% |
RJD | 9/10 | 691 days | 72% |
Mylène | 8/10 | 752 days | 66% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 752 days | 68% |
Colin | 10/10 | 813 days | 62% |
John | 8/10 | 813 days | 61% |
Wendy | 8/10 | 1025 days | 40% |
Jenna | 9/10 | 1087 days | 35% |
Barry | 9/10 | 1362 days | 16% |
Valg | 1/10 | 1390 days | 5% |
Graham | 8/10 | 1452 days | 11% |
Lydia | 7/10 | 1482 days | 10% |
Daniel | 8/10 | 1513 days | 9% |
me | 3/10 | 1543 days | 4% |
Holly J | 8/10 | 1605 days | 6% |
Sandy | 6/10 | 1605 days | 5% |
Dimitri | 3/10 | 1605 days | 3% |
A & D | 7/10 | 1635 days | 5% |
Drew | 7/10 | 1787 days | 3% |
Sita | 3/10 | 1818 days | 1% |
Stuart | 8/10 | 1848 days | 3% |
Shelbi Kelly | 10/10 | 1879 days | 3% |
Chris P | 7/10 | 1971 days | 3% |
El and Josh | 9/10 | 2001 days | 3% |
Fouraroundtheworld | 8/10 | 2001 days | 3% |
Gay Hamilton | 9/10 | 2001 days | 3% |
Katy | 9/10 | 2062 days | 3% |
TP&MM | 8/10 | 2093 days | 3% |
Brice | 7/10 | 2093 days | 3% |
Freya | 9/10 | 2121 days | 3% |
From DK | 8/10 | 2152 days | 3% |
Camille | 6/10 | 2183 days | 2% |
Martin | 7/10 | 2183 days | 2% |
Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 2213 days | 3% |
Angelo | 9/10 | 2213 days | 3% |
Claudia | 9/10 | 2274 days | 3% |
Joe | 6/10 | 2274 days | 2% |
Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2336 days | 2% |
Jess | 8/10 | 2366 days | 2% |
Don | 1/10 | 2397 days | 0% |
The Farrs | 7/10 | 2427 days | 2% |
S Weslake | 8/10 | 2427 days | 2% |
Kay | 8/10 | 2458 days | 2% |
Jean Gandelin | 8/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
Tay Dao Han | 10/10 | 2524 days | 2% |
Stefan Hohmann | 8/10 | 2550 days | 2% |
Jan Vos | 9/10 | 2559 days | 2% |
Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 2707 days | 2% |
Duncan | 8/10 | 2746 days | 2% |
Denise Hall | 9/10 | 2796 days | 2% |
Harriet Smith | 7/10 | 2811 days | 1% |
Helene | 8/10 | 2858 days | 1% |
Lee Burdett | 9/10 | 2867 days | 1% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 8/10 | 2872 days | 1% |
Natalie Guyan | 5/10 | 2886 days | 1% |
Monika | 8/10 | 2957 days | 0% |
Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3126 days | 1% |
Chadd Holland | 6/10 | 3159 days | 0% |
Zdenda Barvinek | 8/10 | 3240 days | 1% |
Stephanie | 8/10 | 3454 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Akaroa Freedom Camping Area does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.41% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.