Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for TECT Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
TECT Park
Valid Reviews
58 Valid Reviews
The TECT Park experience has a total of 59 reviews. There are 58 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 58 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.72% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the TECT Park valid reviews is 91.72% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
95.40%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 36 days | 100% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 97 days | 100% |
| Klaudia | 10/10 | 97 days | 100% |
| Viktoria | 10/10 | 189 days | 98% |
| Lieske | 10/10 | 250 days | 96% |
| Jacinta | 9/10 | 250 days | 96% |
| Sof | 10/10 | 309 days | 95% |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 309 days | 95% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 340 days | 92% |
| Daniel Carranza | 10/10 | 432 days | 89% |
| Audrey | 8/10 | 432 days | 88% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 462 days | 87% |
| Rhea Y | 10/10 | 462 days | 88% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 462 days | 87% |
| cclou | 10/10 | 585 days | 80% |
| Lulu | 10/10 | 646 days | 76% |
| Serena | 8/10 | 2136 days | 3% |
| Fran | 9/10 | 2167 days | 3% |
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2167 days | 3% |
| Remon | 10/10 | 2228 days | 3% |
| Martin Hansen | 10/10 | 2259 days | 3% |
| Bakers | 9/10 | 2289 days | 3% |
| Shane Howe | 10/10 | 2289 days | 3% |
| Kiwi kamper | 8/10 | 2351 days | 3% |
| Michelle Strydom | 10/10 | 2442 days | 3% |
| Marion & Leonie | 9/10 | 2501 days | 3% |
| Courtney | 9/10 | 2501 days | 3% |
| jcastl | 9/10 | 2593 days | 3% |
| Rikke Hessellund, Denmark | 8/10 | 2838 days | 2% |
| Keith Salway | 10/10 | 2877 days | 1% |
| Kyra Trouw | 10/10 | 2914 days | 2% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 5/10 | 2920 days | 1% |
| Claudie MieZech | 10/10 | 2950 days | 2% |
| Christoper Crowhurst | 10/10 | 2997 days | 2% |
| Greta Ross | 8/10 | 3012 days | 2% |
| Greg Smith | 9/10 | 3059 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 9/10 | 3070 days | 2% |
| Daryl Fletcher | 10/10 | 3095 days | 2% |
| Blossom Yoshida | 9/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 9/10 | 3160 days | 1% |
| Nicholas Tranchant | 9/10 | 3167 days | 1% |
| Jana Welsch | 10/10 | 3181 days | 1% |
| Sky Pardoe Davies | 8/10 | 3186 days | 1% |
| Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 3213 days | 1% |
| Alison Gonscak | 10/10 | 3214 days | 1% |
| Jose Verli | 10/10 | 3341 days | 1% |
| Philipp Jahn | 8/10 | 3362 days | 1% |
| Aidan Byrne | 7/10 | 3371 days | 1% |
| Eric Pollard | 10/10 | 3389 days | 1% |
| Thomas Nix | 9/10 | 3488 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 10/10 | 3546 days | 1% |
| Sandra Hamilton | 9/10 | 3558 days | 1% |
| George Bellwood | 9/10 | 3559 days | 0% |
| Philippa and Adam | 10/10 | 3560 days | 1% |
| Nina Jensen | 10/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Tomas Soldat | 8/10 | 3627 days | 0% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3688 days | 0% |
| Niall Crosby | 6/10 | 3812 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. TECT Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.