Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rainbow Springs Nature Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rainbow Springs Nature Park

Valid Reviews

65 Valid Reviews

The Rainbow Springs Nature Park experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
28%
9/10 19
29%
8/10 11
17%
7/10 7
11%
6/10 3
5%
5/10 4
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 1
2%

82.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rainbow Springs Nature Park valid reviews is 82.00% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 11
22%
9/10 15
30%
8/10 10
20%
7/10 7
14%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

82.20% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rainbow Springs Nature Park face-to-face reviews is 82.20% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

57.55%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Bagliore Schmidt 1/10 424 days 100%
Claudia Hobbs 10/10 2942 days 7%
Felix Holm 8/10 3692 days 3%
Lagarde 5/10 3953 days 1%
Stefanie 8/10 3954 days 1%
Zuzana Holubova 10/10 3957 days 1%
Terry Seaman 2/10 4014 days 0%
Annie 9/10 4728 days 2%
Sebastian Rossbach 9/10 4728 days 2%
Mickey 8/10 4728 days 2%
Cynthia 10/10 4728 days 2%
Rene 8/10 4728 days 2%
Christina 10/10 4731 days 2%
Fabienne Indergand 10/10 4811 days 2%
Christina 7/10 4824 days 2%
Phill2517 8/10 5021 days 2%
Jon_and_Family 10/10 5051 days 2%
Leanne Shepherd 7/10 5074 days 2%
Pat_65 9/10 5082 days 2%
Cheryl 9/10 5100 days 2%
Dennis & Claudia 9/10 5102 days 2%
Barry 9/10 5103 days 2%
Robin Schomburg 10/10 5107 days 2%
Silke Seemann 10/10 5438 days 2%
Brent S 9/10 5441 days 2%
Roger Trusedale 10/10 5457 days 2%
Lynn Tichauer 10/10 5458 days 2%
Tanja Haring 8/10 5460 days 2%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5467 days 2%
Stephen 9/10 5471 days 2%
Bram-Jan M 5/10 5474 days 1%
Beute Hjel 4/10 5491 days 1%
stephenst 8/10 5521 days 2%
timgr 8/10 5522 days 2%
Cyriel Schacken 8/10 5547 days 2%
bdevries 9/10 5548 days 2%
eowyn2k 9/10 5567 days 2%
trvlbug 10/10 5690 days 2%
monniere 6/10 5691 days 1%
TrevorK 9/10 5814 days 2%
SarahK 10/10 5814 days 2%
MartinG 9/10 5814 days 2%
PellucoFrance 9/10 5815 days 2%
James 7/10 5830 days 2%
Sharleen Stewart 10/10 5833 days 2%
RubenD 7/10 5840 days 2%
Henk 9/10 5846 days 2%
straw64 5/10 5871 days 1%
Maud 6/10 5886 days 1%
Spyfox 10/10 5888 days 2%
nsmith 10/10 5934 days 2%
NORTZ 9/10 5943 days 2%
Clare 9/10 5948 days 2%
S D 9/10 5995 days 2%
fgregory 10/10 6044 days 2%
Naoko 7/10 6147 days 2%
Lena1 10/10 6182 days 2%
Atara 10/10 6192 days 2%
Jenny Hulsebosch 6/10 6209 days 1%
Jo 9/10 6223 days 2%
Seldam 7/10 6229 days 2%
Kevin 8/10 6266 days 2%
John 5/10 6499 days 1%
andrew julie 7/10 6505 days 2%
Cohen 8/10 6507 days 2%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rainbow Springs Nature Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.13% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Rainbow Springs Nature Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Rainbow Springs Nature Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.07%
198 -4.09%
199 -4.11%
200 -4.13%
201 -4.15%
202 -4.17%
203 -4.19%

Balancing Adjustment

19.28% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

73%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.