Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort

Valid Reviews

69 Valid Reviews

The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has a total of 72 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 10
14%
9/10 20
29%
8/10 26
38%
7/10 8
12%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 3
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

82.75% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort valid reviews is 82.75% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

60 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 60 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
12%
9/10 17
28%
8/10 24
40%
7/10 7
12%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 3
5%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.83% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort face-to-face reviews is 81.83% and is based on 60 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

83.14%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Johannes F 8/10 2911 days 100%
ben carroll 10/10 2942 days 100%
Ludovica Velo 9/10 3207 days 81%
Jan 6/10 3215 days 70%
Ral Pritchard 8/10 3231 days 78%
Catherine Schlachter 9/10 3893 days 33%
Christina Perez 8/10 3893 days 33%
Marc Engstle 8/10 3940 days 30%
Toke Frederiksen 7/10 3941 days 28%
Jirka Sirka 10/10 4271 days 7%
Jill Fischer 9/10 4311 days 5%
Craig Jones 8/10 4342 days 2%
Michal 8/10 4359 days 1%
Adam Hassan 8/10 4378 days 0%
Gerard van de Ven 9/10 4378 days 0%
The Mowbrays 9/10 4383 days 35%
Helmut Schmid 10/10 4642 days 35%
Romla 8/10 4655 days 35%
Ronald Veldman 8/10 4655 days 35%
Suzanne van Kol 9/10 4670 days 35%
Ellen Jacobs 8/10 4675 days 35%
_mel_ 8/10 4708 days 35%
kiwifrenchy 7/10 4708 days 33%
Tobias Forst 9/10 4740 days 35%
Ross Cooke 10/10 4746 days 35%
David & Mary-Jane Ryder 10/10 4751 days 35%
Eric & Liz McKean 10/10 4996 days 35%
Aimee Pollett 7/10 5004 days 33%
Marty Fey 7/10 5005 days 33%
Joop Ezendam 8/10 5006 days 35%
John Taylor 9/10 5013 days 35%
Nick Roberts 7/10 5017 days 33%
Isabel & Tillmann 9/10 5017 days 35%
mr Schumader 8/10 5028 days 35%
Eva Weichs 7/10 5032 days 33%
David 10/10 5032 days 35%
Trov & Liz Warren 8/10 5034 days 35%
Matthijs Muijsers 8/10 5035 days 35%
Alan & Gill Geach 8/10 5036 days 35%
Sarah Ewing 10/10 5039 days 35%
weed 9/10 5042 days 35%
HighlandLassie 10/10 5042 days 35%
Gunther 9/10 5292 days 35%
Adam Gerrard 5/10 5309 days 27%
marisraneth 8/10 5348 days 35%
John N 9/10 5373 days 35%
Blair Malcolm 7/10 5388 days 33%
Josy 5/10 5399 days 27%
JeanOddy 9/10 5401 days 35%
jeffandlou 8/10 5458 days 35%
Jarda Novotag 6/10 5479 days 30%
Charles Lyne 9/10 5683 days 35%
LucieG 8/10 5722 days 35%
ZimmermannA 8/10 5723 days 35%
CharlesG 7/10 5725 days 33%
Kruiver 8/10 5733 days 35%
MauzcoV 8/10 5733 days 35%
Jasmin 8/10 5744 days 35%
Nadine 9/10 5744 days 35%
AnthonyB1 9/10 5747 days 35%
Rafael 5/10 5750 days 27%
Marieke 9/10 5806 days 35%
woodolly 10/10 6057 days 35%
Linda and Peter 8/10 6092 days 35%
Andria Davis 8/10 6106 days 35%
Jane Holm 8/10 6161 days 35%
Bas Marieke 9/10 6454 days 35%
Dennis 9/10 6460 days 35%
Ulla 9/10 6467 days 35%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.05% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Orakei Korako Geyserland Resort experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.99%
198 -4.01%
199 -4.03%
200 -4.05%
201 -4.07%
202 -4.09%
203 -4.11%

Balancing Adjustment

3.26% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.