G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has a total of 100 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
42% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging valid reviews is 88.13% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
71 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 71 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging face-to-face reviews is 85.92% and is based on 71 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Victor | 8/10 | 3235 days | 100% |
| Jessica Freeland | 9/10 | 3280 days | 97% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 3283 days | 96% |
| Cathrin Wisgiekl | 8/10 | 4304 days | 5% |
| Marc Engstle | 5/10 | 4322 days | 2% |
| Matthias Freiling | 7/10 | 4326 days | 3% |
| Johannes | 7/10 | 4327 days | 3% |
| Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4349 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Schanz | 9/10 | 4352 days | 1% |
| Philip Gosemann | 9/10 | 4352 days | 1% |
| Jake Bell | 10/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Neele & Philipp | 9/10 | 4675 days | 44% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 4762 days | 44% |
| Curry | 10/10 | 5133 days | 44% |
| Craig Hathaway | 10/10 | 5364 days | 44% |
| Sarah James | 10/10 | 5364 days | 44% |
| Nicola Young | 6/10 | 5364 days | 38% |
| Isabell | 10/10 | 5384 days | 44% |
| Justin Pearce | 4/10 | 5400 days | 28% |
| tandysandhu | 10/10 | 5455 days | 44% |
| alexiap | 8/10 | 5486 days | 44% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5608 days | 44% |
| Marea | 9/10 | 5639 days | 44% |
| Pete & Judy McChesney | 10/10 | 5693 days | 44% |
| claireamanda | 9/10 | 5700 days | 44% |
| laurabridges | 10/10 | 5700 days | 44% |
| Ben Thomas | 10/10 | 5730 days | 44% |
| sam jones | 10/10 | 5761 days | 44% |
| Rachel Honore | 10/10 | 5761 days | 44% |
| Pip | 10/10 | 5761 days | 44% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5763 days | 44% |
| Alzbeta Czech | 10/10 | 5775 days | 44% |
| sazz | 10/10 | 5789 days | 44% |
| Amelie Sutcliffe | 10/10 | 5789 days | 44% |
| iep_crew | 10/10 | 5789 days | 44% |
| Kane Chain | 8/10 | 5806 days | 44% |
| stroalki | 7/10 | 5820 days | 41% |
| Angela Stringer | 9/10 | 5820 days | 44% |
| hendrik gottschalk | 10/10 | 5820 days | 44% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5840 days | 44% |
| rosalindm | 10/10 | 5845 days | 44% |
| Lesley Nixon | 6/10 | 5861 days | 38% |
| bondd | 10/10 | 5960 days | 44% |
| Keith | 9/10 | 6119 days | 44% |
| kiwibrit86 | 9/10 | 6138 days | 44% |
| NinaH1 | 8/10 | 6145 days | 44% |
| renanf | 9/10 | 6145 days | 44% |
| DaraghD | 9/10 | 6152 days | 44% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 6157 days | 44% |
| Lucas | 4/10 | 6157 days | 28% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 6161 days | 44% |
| Liekens | 8/10 | 6215 days | 44% |
| jfletch | 10/10 | 6225 days | 44% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 6226 days | 44% |
| siobhan | 10/10 | 6228 days | 44% |
| mike brett | 8/10 | 6228 days | 44% |
| Evelyn | 7/10 | 6229 days | 41% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 6235 days | 44% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6270 days | 44% |
| maria d | 10/10 | 6337 days | 44% |
| JP Alberto | 10/10 | 6339 days | 44% |
| Daniala | 9/10 | 6362 days | 44% |
| Rhys Howell | 9/10 | 6428 days | 44% |
| Toni Keown | 10/10 | 6453 days | 44% |
| Nicnac | 9/10 | 6460 days | 44% |
| Mark | 9/10 | 6465 days | 44% |
| Claire | 10/10 | 6481 days | 44% |
| Stephanie | 10/10 | 6507 days | 44% |
| Marc Hertogs | 9/10 | 6511 days | 44% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6520 days | 44% |
| Stacey | 10/10 | 6520 days | 44% |
| Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6535 days | 44% |
| Hayley | 7/10 | 6535 days | 41% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 9/10 | 6538 days | 44% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6542 days | 38% |
| Anneli | 10/10 | 6543 days | 44% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6543 days | 44% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 6576 days | 44% |
| Neil Cooke | 8/10 | 6577 days | 44% |
| Manuel | 9/10 | 6584 days | 44% |
| Tom Clements | 8/10 | 6585 days | 44% |
| Richard Kindgren | 8/10 | 6587 days | 44% |
| Linda | 10/10 | 6811 days | 44% |
| ShoshanaAbrams | 9/10 | 6816 days | 44% |
| LauraMarini | 9/10 | 6820 days | 44% |
| Cohen | 8/10 | 6821 days | 44% |
| Valerie | 8/10 | 6822 days | 44% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 6823 days | 41% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 6825 days | 44% |
| AnnaHerbert | 10/10 | 6831 days | 44% |
| Austin | 9/10 | 6839 days | 44% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 6839 days | 44% |
| AnnaOwen | 10/10 | 6850 days | 44% |
| AndrewEwen | 6/10 | 6850 days | 38% |
| Nina | 7/10 | 6867 days | 41% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 6867 days | 44% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaitiaki Adventures Rafting and Sledging experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.82% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.