Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Go Orange.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
97 Valid Reviews
The Go Orange experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
82.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange valid reviews is 82.58% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 81 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 81 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange face-to-face reviews is 85.68% and is based on 81 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.22%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mike | 1/10 | 1915 days | 37% |
Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 2067 days | 100% |
Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 2251 days | 92% |
Hang Tran | 1/10 | 2280 days | 30% |
Rafi | 1/10 | 2311 days | 29% |
San Thompson | 1/10 | 2495 days | 26% |
Derek Green | 9/10 | 2616 days | 74% |
Molly | 2/10 | 2617 days | 28% |
Katrina | 10/10 | 2706 days | 70% |
Jared Cordner | 8/10 | 2957 days | 56% |
Nigel Mead | 10/10 | 2981 days | 57% |
Nazlinda Md Nasir | 10/10 | 2981 days | 57% |
Klaus | 10/10 | 2984 days | 56% |
Philip Busd | 9/10 | 2987 days | 56% |
Henna | 10/10 | 3012 days | 55% |
Felicity Hughes | 10/10 | 3022 days | 55% |
Sandra Marangi | 4/10 | 3031 days | 31% |
Sebasitian | 9/10 | 3034 days | 53% |
Max Mueller | 10/10 | 3056 days | 53% |
Barbara Knops | 10/10 | 3060 days | 53% |
Jasmine Rogers | 4/10 | 3074 days | 30% |
Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 3074 days | 51% |
Connor Hormell | 10/10 | 3075 days | 52% |
Karlee Hormell | 8/10 | 3076 days | 51% |
Petr Jesko | 7/10 | 3077 days | 48% |
Sandra Piechoua | 9/10 | 3077 days | 51% |
Joni Vihakara | 9/10 | 3078 days | 51% |
Bruno | 10/10 | 3080 days | 52% |
Megan Jurgensmeyer | 10/10 | 3109 days | 50% |
Timothy Delaney | 8/10 | 3276 days | 41% |
Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3314 days | 40% |
Max | 8/10 | 3317 days | 39% |
Olivier Reculeau | 10/10 | 3318 days | 40% |
Coralie Dhenin | 4/10 | 3319 days | 22% |
Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3320 days | 40% |
Valentine de Beer | 9/10 | 3321 days | 40% |
Mathilde | 8/10 | 3328 days | 39% |
Floriane Desnoyer | 9/10 | 3329 days | 39% |
Renoit Besnard | 8/10 | 3332 days | 39% |
Jaime Alarma Olmos | 10/10 | 3334 days | 39% |
Dominique | 9/10 | 3338 days | 39% |
Derick Trotter | 8/10 | 3338 days | 38% |
Dennis Springer | 8/10 | 3340 days | 38% |
Laura Mahdavian | 10/10 | 3343 days | 39% |
Stan | 9/10 | 3343 days | 38% |
Alexander Mattea | 7/10 | 3344 days | 35% |
S Black | 8/10 | 3346 days | 38% |
Gae Saevane | 8/10 | 3347 days | 38% |
Joe Rogers | 8/10 | 3351 days | 38% |
Riviere | 9/10 | 3358 days | 38% |
Gerardo Furtado | 10/10 | 3364 days | 38% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3377 days | 36% |
Lucile Souday | 8/10 | 3385 days | 36% |
Franziska Hohmann | 9/10 | 3390 days | 36% |
Ian Hortop | 10/10 | 3391 days | 37% |
Rachael and Nik | 7/10 | 3391 days | 33% |
Gregory | 7/10 | 3393 days | 33% |
Laura Sturm | 10/10 | 3431 days | 35% |
Xue Rong Kok | 10/10 | 3437 days | 34% |
Frans Diebrink | 9/10 | 3437 days | 34% |
Fides | 10/10 | 3703 days | 21% |
Christoph | 8/10 | 3703 days | 21% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3703 days | 21% |
Chris | 10/10 | 3703 days | 21% |
Annika Funk | 8/10 | 3738 days | 19% |
Ivan Dimitrov | 9/10 | 3761 days | 18% |
Cora and Franzi | 10/10 | 3794 days | 17% |
Stefanie | 8/10 | 4046 days | 4% |
Karolina Gren | 7/10 | 4047 days | 4% |
Maria-Julia Frilaj | 8/10 | 4055 days | 4% |
Adriana | 9/10 | 4055 days | 4% |
Pavel Jarolimek | 8/10 | 4055 days | 4% |
Lilli Erni | 10/10 | 4056 days | 4% |
Manuel Bleiker | 9/10 | 4056 days | 4% |
Marie Toulemonde | 5/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
Annika Marz | 10/10 | 4070 days | 4% |
Julian Zeissler | 9/10 | 4070 days | 3% |
Claudia Bauch | 9/10 | 4076 days | 3% |
thibaut vernelle | 9/10 | 4076 days | 3% |
Mara | 8/10 | 4080 days | 3% |
Andrea Morello | 8/10 | 4080 days | 3% |
Vera Kreipe | 8/10 | 4083 days | 3% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 8/10 | 4083 days | 3% |
Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4092 days | 2% |
Matusala Habtemariam | 9/10 | 4102 days | 2% |
Francisco Pablo Miguel | 7/10 | 4103 days | 1% |
Bjoern | 8/10 | 4105 days | 2% |
Viola | 9/10 | 4105 days | 2% |
Amanda | 10/10 | 4106 days | 2% |
Julien de la lande | 9/10 | 4119 days | 1% |
Aude Moulin | 9/10 | 4119 days | 1% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 7/10 | 4126 days | 0% |
Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 4126 days | 1% |
Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4127 days | 1% |
Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4127 days | 1% |
Maya Barad | 8/10 | 4127 days | 1% |
Nora Zeitz | 10/10 | 4136 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Go Orange experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.14% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 77 days. However the Go Orange experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Go Orange experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.09% |
198 | -3.10% |
199 | -3.12% |
200 | -3.14% |
201 | -3.15% |
202 | -3.17% |
203 | -3.18% |
… | … |
2.71% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.