Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Go Orange.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
97 Valid Reviews
The Go Orange experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
82.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange valid reviews is 82.58% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 81 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 81 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Go Orange face-to-face reviews is 85.68% and is based on 81 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.39%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mike | 1/10 | 1757 days | 35% |
Adrian Macdonald | 9/10 | 1910 days | 100% |
Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 2094 days | 92% |
Hang Tran | 1/10 | 2122 days | 26% |
Rafi | 1/10 | 2153 days | 26% |
San Thompson | 1/10 | 2337 days | 22% |
Derek Green | 9/10 | 2459 days | 74% |
Molly | 2/10 | 2459 days | 24% |
Katrina | 10/10 | 2549 days | 70% |
Jared Cordner | 8/10 | 2799 days | 57% |
Nigel Mead | 10/10 | 2824 days | 57% |
Nazlinda Md Nasir | 10/10 | 2824 days | 57% |
Klaus | 10/10 | 2826 days | 57% |
Philip Busd | 9/10 | 2829 days | 56% |
Henna | 10/10 | 2854 days | 56% |
Felicity Hughes | 10/10 | 2864 days | 55% |
Sandra Marangi | 4/10 | 2873 days | 30% |
Sebasitian | 9/10 | 2876 days | 54% |
Max Mueller | 10/10 | 2898 days | 54% |
Barbara Knops | 10/10 | 2902 days | 53% |
Jasmine Rogers | 4/10 | 2916 days | 28% |
Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 2916 days | 51% |
Connor Hormell | 10/10 | 2917 days | 53% |
Karlee Hormell | 8/10 | 2918 days | 51% |
Petr Jesko | 7/10 | 2919 days | 48% |
Sandra Piechoua | 9/10 | 2919 days | 52% |
Joni Vihakara | 9/10 | 2920 days | 52% |
Bruno | 10/10 | 2922 days | 52% |
Megan Jurgensmeyer | 10/10 | 2951 days | 51% |
Timothy Delaney | 8/10 | 3118 days | 42% |
Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3156 days | 41% |
Max | 8/10 | 3159 days | 40% |
Olivier Reculeau | 10/10 | 3160 days | 41% |
Coralie Dhenin | 4/10 | 3161 days | 21% |
Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3162 days | 40% |
Valentine de Beer | 9/10 | 3163 days | 40% |
Mathilde | 8/10 | 3170 days | 39% |
Floriane Desnoyer | 9/10 | 3171 days | 40% |
Renoit Besnard | 8/10 | 3174 days | 39% |
Jaime Alarma Olmos | 10/10 | 3176 days | 40% |
Dominique | 9/10 | 3180 days | 40% |
Derick Trotter | 8/10 | 3180 days | 39% |
Dennis Springer | 8/10 | 3182 days | 39% |
Laura Mahdavian | 10/10 | 3185 days | 40% |
Stan | 9/10 | 3185 days | 39% |
Alexander Mattea | 7/10 | 3186 days | 36% |
S Black | 8/10 | 3189 days | 39% |
Gae Saevane | 8/10 | 3189 days | 39% |
Joe Rogers | 8/10 | 3193 days | 38% |
Riviere | 9/10 | 3200 days | 39% |
Gerardo Furtado | 10/10 | 3206 days | 39% |
Melanie Kronbichler | 8/10 | 3219 days | 37% |
Lucile Souday | 8/10 | 3227 days | 37% |
Franziska Hohmann | 9/10 | 3232 days | 37% |
Ian Hortop | 10/10 | 3233 days | 38% |
Rachael and Nik | 7/10 | 3233 days | 34% |
Gregory | 7/10 | 3235 days | 34% |
Laura Sturm | 10/10 | 3273 days | 36% |
Xue Rong Kok | 10/10 | 3280 days | 35% |
Frans Diebrink | 9/10 | 3280 days | 35% |
Fides | 10/10 | 3545 days | 23% |
Christoph | 8/10 | 3545 days | 22% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 3545 days | 22% |
Chris | 10/10 | 3545 days | 23% |
Annika Funk | 8/10 | 3580 days | 20% |
Ivan Dimitrov | 9/10 | 3603 days | 19% |
Cora and Franzi | 10/10 | 3636 days | 18% |
Stefanie | 8/10 | 3888 days | 6% |
Karolina Gren | 7/10 | 3889 days | 4% |
Maria-Julia Frilaj | 8/10 | 3897 days | 5% |
Adriana | 9/10 | 3897 days | 5% |
Pavel Jarolimek | 8/10 | 3897 days | 5% |
Lilli Erni | 10/10 | 3898 days | 6% |
Manuel Bleiker | 9/10 | 3898 days | 5% |
Marie Toulemonde | 5/10 | 3899 days | 0% |
Annika Marz | 10/10 | 3912 days | 5% |
Julian Zeissler | 9/10 | 3912 days | 5% |
Claudia Bauch | 9/10 | 3918 days | 4% |
thibaut vernelle | 9/10 | 3918 days | 4% |
Mara | 8/10 | 3922 days | 4% |
Andrea Morello | 8/10 | 3922 days | 4% |
Vera Kreipe | 8/10 | 3925 days | 4% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 8/10 | 3925 days | 4% |
Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 3934 days | 4% |
Matusala Habtemariam | 9/10 | 3944 days | 3% |
Francisco Pablo Miguel | 7/10 | 3945 days | 2% |
Bjoern | 8/10 | 3947 days | 3% |
Viola | 9/10 | 3947 days | 3% |
Amanda | 10/10 | 3948 days | 3% |
Julien de la lande | 9/10 | 3961 days | 2% |
Aude Moulin | 9/10 | 3961 days | 2% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 7/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 3968 days | 2% |
Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 3969 days | 2% |
Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 3969 days | 2% |
Maya Barad | 8/10 | 3969 days | 2% |
Nora Zeitz | 10/10 | 3978 days | 2% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Go Orange experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Go Orange experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Go Orange experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.00% |
198 | -4.02% |
199 | -4.04% |
200 | -4.06% |
201 | -4.08% |
202 | -4.10% |
203 | -4.12% |
… | … |
2.91% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.