G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Crown Range Summit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
37 Valid Reviews
The Crown Range Summit experience has a total of 42 reviews. There are 37 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 37 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 11 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Crown Range Summit valid reviews is 85.41% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Morgan | 5/10 | 541 days | 85% |
Christy | 6/10 | 572 days | 94% |
Florian | 9/10 | 661 days | 100% |
Florian | 9/10 | 661 days | 100% |
Sanny | 10/10 | 692 days | 98% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1391 days | 21% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1728 days | 7% |
Peter | 10/10 | 1788 days | 7% |
Solveig | 10/10 | 1819 days | 7% |
Fran | 7/10 | 1819 days | 6% |
Forrest Poirier | 8/10 | 1849 days | 6% |
Emily Schacher | 10/10 | 1880 days | 6% |
Tiago | 10/10 | 1972 days | 6% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 2063 days | 6% |
Breeze | 8/10 | 2153 days | 6% |
Marilli | 6/10 | 2184 days | 5% |
Mischa | 10/10 | 2245 days | 5% |
Sophie Skinner | 6/10 | 2245 days | 5% |
Scooper | 10/10 | 2275 days | 5% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2337 days | 5% |
Christina | 9/10 | 2428 days | 5% |
Klex Becker | 9/10 | 2496 days | 5% |
Alice Addy | 8/10 | 2771 days | 4% |
Tash van Leeuwen | 9/10 | 2791 days | 4% |
Niels Petit | 10/10 | 2833 days | 4% |
Craig Eagleton | 9/10 | 2857 days | 4% |
Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 2878 days | 4% |
Puneet Mishra | 9/10 | 2968 days | 4% |
Avery Wong | 9/10 | 3269 days | 3% |
Gerard Schlooz | 8/10 | 3302 days | 3% |
Anita and Wilbur | 8/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
Steffen Paul | 6/10 | 3504 days | 2% |
Niamh Duane | 8/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
Matt Weston | 9/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
Pioter Jurkowski | 7/10 | 3979 days | 1% |
patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4254 days | 0% |
S M | 8/10 | 4313 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Crown Range Summit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.