Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve

Valid Reviews

59 Valid Reviews

The Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 59 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 13
22%
9/10 14
24%
8/10 18
31%
7/10 12
20%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.90% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 83.90% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

84.09%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Mathieu 10/10 64 days 100%
Milly Struthers 8/10 94 days 98%
Aaron 7/10 94 days 93%
Walvins 10/10 94 days 100%
A King 8/10 156 days 97%
AJC 5/10 156 days 75%
Holly 7/10 217 days 91%
Valg 8/10 247 days 95%
Holly 9/10 278 days 95%
Linda 8/10 307 days 93%
Dale Robinson 8/10 369 days 90%
Agnes 9/10 369 days 91%
Gunnar&Maria 8/10 369 days 90%
Pickles 8/10 399 days 89%
Mayla 8/10 399 days 89%
Marie Perret 9/10 430 days 89%
Maartje 7/10 460 days 82%
Fluid 10/10 460 days 88%
Henry 9/10 491 days 85%
J Ryder 10/10 522 days 84%
KiwiSauce 7/10 522 days 78%
Jolanda Krikke 8/10 522 days 83%
Paul 10/10 583 days 81%
Julie 9/10 583 days 80%
Christa 9/10 583 days 80%
Paul 9/10 583 days 80%
Shel 6/10 613 days 67%
wvdbos 7/10 613 days 73%
HJR 10/10 613 days 78%
Matthew 9/10 672 days 73%
Isa 9/10 672 days 73%
Haze 7/10 672 days 69%
Willow 9/10 703 days 71%
Paige Hayward 8/10 764 days 65%
BerryD 9/10 825 days 60%
Leet 8/10 887 days 53%
Curtis 10/10 948 days 48%
Juni 9/10 1068 days 36%
Keybags 10/10 1374 days 15%
Tessie 9/10 1402 days 14%
Rey 7/10 1464 days 10%
Natalie 10/10 1617 days 6%
Carl Bright 10/10 1617 days 6%
Dave 8/10 1647 days 5%
Lauren 10/10 1678 days 5%
Peter 9/10 1799 days 4%
Dennis Rijbroek 7/10 1921 days 3%
Adam 7/10 1921 days 3%
Mark Jarvis 7/10 1921 days 3%
Clare & Gerry 10/10 2105 days 3%
Pat Burns 7/10 2105 days 3%
Marion & Leonie 8/10 2133 days 3%
Anni 8/10 2164 days 3%
jofa972 8/10 2439 days 2%
Judy Aspinall 7/10 2789 days 1%
Beth Goodrich 8/10 3059 days 1%
Michal 10/10 3418 days 0%
Berni Hart 8/10 3565 days 0%
Cherie Marshall 8/10 3630 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Huka/Aratiatia Rapids Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.01% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.