G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre

Valid Reviews

175 Valid Reviews

The Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 179 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 68
39%
9/10 38
22%
8/10 37
21%
7/10 12
7%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 6
3%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 2
1%

85.71% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

165 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 59
36%
9/10 38
23%
8/10 37
22%
7/10 12
7%
6/10 9
5%
5/10 6
4%
4/10 3
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

85.39% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

87.82%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
S Weslake 10/10 2592 days 100%
Rebecca Martin 10/10 2637 days 97%
Sophie Ingram 10/10 2773 days 89%
C Flynn 1/10 3032 days 22%
Josh Lesley-Smith 10/10 3053 days 71%
Marc 9/10 3073 days 69%
Emily Noyd 9/10 3310 days 54%
Cayla Stanley 10/10 3310 days 55%
Salvador Jimenez 10/10 3382 days 50%
Philipp Richter 6/10 3449 days 38%
Simon Quass 10/10 3450 days 46%
Sarah Boettcher 9/10 3457 days 45%
Clement Oudjaovok 8/10 3675 days 31%
Katherine Halliday 9/10 3677 days 31%
Daniela Wall 7/10 3677 days 28%
Katherine Britten 9/10 3680 days 31%
Megan 10/10 3681 days 31%
Nina Müller 9/10 3703 days 29%
Maria Schober 4/10 3704 days 15%
Marie Schmid 10/10 3709 days 29%
Charles Aubry 10/10 3710 days 29%
Arvid Hellquist 9/10 3720 days 28%
Celia Nowak 8/10 3721 days 28%
Jiri Blecha 8/10 3722 days 28%
Marie Weber 9/10 3722 days 28%
Michal Kamradek 7/10 3757 days 24%
Dieter Schmees 9/10 3759 days 26%
Barbara 9/10 3761 days 26%
Mathieu Brunel 10/10 3761 days 26%
Thomas and Sonja 10/10 3770 days 25%
Jam Boggomann 10/10 3774 days 25%
Pauline Gibson 10/10 3776 days 25%
Ian Brand 10/10 3778 days 25%
Antoine Vernay 8/10 3783 days 24%
Shona MacDonald 10/10 4019 days 10%
Ane Didriksen 10/10 4019 days 10%
Iris Anette Berger 10/10 4019 days 10%
Claudia de Winter 7/10 4024 days 8%
Cecilia Anderson 4/10 4024 days 2%
Christina Perez 8/10 4028 days 9%
Paula Renton 8/10 4029 days 9%
Maria-Julia Frilaj 9/10 4030 days 9%
Simon Mehlmann 9/10 4030 days 9%
Carolin Siegert 9/10 4030 days 9%
Pavel Jarolimek 5/10 4030 days 4%
Patricia Erni 8/10 4031 days 9%
Robert Erni 8/10 4031 days 9%
Lilli Erni 8/10 4031 days 9%
Erik Nestlez 8/10 4036 days 8%
Wouter Vanmoz 10/10 4037 days 9%
Laure Cops 9/10 4037 days 8%
Annika Marz 10/10 4045 days 8%
Julian Zeissler 8/10 4045 days 8%
Adam 7/10 4045 days 7%
Petra Albrchtoval 6/10 4045 days 5%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 4050 days 6%
Drame Mahmadou 8/10 4050 days 7%
Joanna Mulcahy 10/10 4050 days 8%
Helma Druyken 9/10 4051 days 8%
marcel and conny 10/10 4053 days 8%
Helen 10/10 4053 days 8%
Igor 7/10 4053 days 6%
Ray Bygrave 9/10 4054 days 7%
Maria Camen Santos Lopez 10/10 4054 days 8%
Veeh Barrington 8/10 4054 days 7%
Hirsch Svenja 10/10 4056 days 7%
Mahr Svenja 7/10 4056 days 6%
Johanna Kofler 6/10 4056 days 5%
Kathrin Deichmann 7/10 4058 days 6%
Konrad Ullmann 8/10 4059 days 7%
Lukas Lehmeyer 8/10 4059 days 7%
Mark Hofmann 9/10 4059 days 7%
Louison Laissus 10/10 4062 days 7%
Ennico 10/10 4065 days 7%
Juliane 7/10 4065 days 5%
Hannah 7/10 4065 days 5%
Callum 6/10 4065 days 4%
Barbara 10/10 4065 days 7%
Marinette 10/10 4065 days 7%
Larry Majerus 10/10 4066 days 7%
Jan Majerus 10/10 4066 days 7%
Philip Donachie 10/10 4069 days 7%
Luisa Bach 10/10 4069 days 7%
Karel 10/10 4069 days 7%
Phillip 8/10 4071 days 6%
Libby 5/10 4074 days 2%
Colin Billington 5/10 4075 days 2%
Gassat 10/10 4075 days 6%
Janis Gallois 8/10 4076 days 6%
Andreas Jung 6/10 4077 days 3%
Francisco Pablo Miguel 8/10 4078 days 6%
Constanza Salas 10/10 4086 days 6%
Jesse Flynn 8/10 4088 days 5%
Andrea Hiemer 10/10 4088 days 5%
Bella Danaher 9/10 4090 days 5%
Daniel Danamer 10/10 4090 days 5%
Christina Habranke 10/10 4093 days 5%
Julia Bonisch 10/10 4096 days 5%
Ina Daubenbuechel 9/10 4097 days 5%
Nelle Dutilleur 8/10 4099 days 4%
Johanna Bak 10/10 4100 days 5%
David Esner 10/10 4101 days 5%
Felix 10/10 4101 days 5%
David Brooks 10/10 4101 days 5%
Camille Gagnant 5/10 4102 days 0%
kamil Benes 6/10 4109 days 2%
Johannes Markus 6/10 4110 days 2%
Greg Fischer 10/10 4110 days 4%
Harel Cliad 10/10 4110 days 4%
Danica Vrsljko 7/10 4110 days 3%
Simon Cassie 9/10 4111 days 4%
nimrod yaron 10/10 4111 days 4%
Claire Dann 7/10 4112 days 3%
Carina Huhmann 8/10 4117 days 3%
Anne Schneider 10/10 4117 days 4%
Hennk Hartke 9/10 4118 days 3%
Charles Busnel 10/10 4119 days 3%
Paige Galbraith 8/10 4120 days 3%
Bjorn Van Mulders 9/10 4122 days 3%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4122 days 3%
Eric and Nienke 10/10 4143 days 2%
Elly Kappert 10/10 4173 days 0%
Sylvia Klatt 10/10 4387 days 19%
Supiot Zudovic 10/10 4400 days 19%
Fjord 9/10 4402 days 19%
Sophie Spady 10/10 4404 days 19%
Soizic 9/10 4404 days 19%
Christofer Tonn 10/10 4404 days 19%
Ken Milligan 8/10 4405 days 19%
Sarah Horn 9/10 4406 days 19%
Yu-Ti Chu 8/10 4409 days 19%
Ton Martens 10/10 4409 days 19%
Hendrik Rother 9/10 4409 days 19%
Nora 8/10 4411 days 19%
Katey Justice 10/10 4413 days 19%
Douglas Walker 8/10 4413 days 19%
tim wettack 10/10 4418 days 19%
Marketa 9/10 4418 days 19%
Sabisch Moritz 9/10 4418 days 19%
Stella Thoben 10/10 4420 days 19%
Paul Liecke 9/10 4420 days 19%
Caderet 10/10 4420 days 19%
James Young 10/10 4420 days 19%
Florent Corino 9/10 4422 days 19%
Lea Bulle 9/10 4422 days 19%
Tobi 5/10 4423 days 12%
Ian 8/10 4424 days 19%
Anna Niesl 10/10 4424 days 19%
Janine Kohlgrueler 9/10 4425 days 19%
Arno Leleu 8/10 4427 days 19%
Alessa Ndra 10/10 4428 days 19%
Patrick O'Connell 10/10 4428 days 19%
Francois Marchar 6/10 4428 days 15%
Kristine and William 5/10 4431 days 12%
Veronica and Jordi 10/10 4437 days 19%
Johnny McManmon 9/10 4439 days 19%
Christoph Mueller 6/10 4440 days 15%
Nora and Edward 8/10 4441 days 19%
Christina Rodewald 8/10 4451 days 19%
Nadine and Jan 8/10 4490 days 19%
Henrik Steinruecken 8/10 4490 days 19%
Wertra 9/10 4491 days 19%
Aurelie Morin 9/10 4499 days 19%
Leticia Martin 10/10 4499 days 19%
Martin Thomas 9/10 4500 days 19%
Franz Schueler 10/10 4500 days 19%
F Soppelsa 1/10 4501 days 0%
Dirk 4/10 4506 days 8%
Katharina Pape 8/10 4506 days 19%
Abby Rushmer 9/10 4507 days 19%
Sasha and Sandra Bonavia 10/10 4508 days 19%
Dio 8/10 4510 days 19%
Stephan Olivier 8/10 4512 days 19%
Stephan Olivier 8/10 4512 days 19%
Anna 9/10 4750 days 19%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.32% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.