Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Awastone.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Awastone
Valid Reviews
44 Valid Reviews
The Awastone experience has a total of 47 reviews. There are 44 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
70% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Awastone valid reviews is 95.45% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
95.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB | 8/10 | 659 days | 100% |
| Alastair McQueen | 10/10 | 751 days | 92% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 751 days | 92% |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 812 days | 85% |
| Laura E | 10/10 | 1116 days | 46% |
| Linda Eagleton | 10/10 | 1389 days | 21% |
| Mary and David NZ | 9/10 | 1755 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1847 days | 7% |
| Nik | 10/10 | 2061 days | 6% |
| Marty | 6/10 | 2092 days | 5% |
| Jess | 10/10 | 2092 days | 6% |
| Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2151 days | 6% |
| Nat | 9/10 | 2457 days | 5% |
| Christoph Emch | 10/10 | 2504 days | 5% |
| julie leaver | 10/10 | 2516 days | 5% |
| Liam Gardiner | 9/10 | 2538 days | 5% |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 2541 days | 5% |
| Pier-Yves Poulin | 10/10 | 2555 days | 5% |
| Michael Ebner | 10/10 | 2557 days | 5% |
| Glenn Hedges | 10/10 | 2607 days | 5% |
| Christoper Crowhurst | 9/10 | 2616 days | 4% |
| Peter Waller | 9/10 | 2620 days | 4% |
| Haidar Mahdi | 10/10 | 2623 days | 4% |
| Bruce May | 10/10 | 2697 days | 4% |
| Sean Cox | 10/10 | 2894 days | 4% |
| Ursula Schoenenberger | 8/10 | 2898 days | 4% |
| Maria Frandsen | 10/10 | 2906 days | 4% |
| Jayma Dancer | 9/10 | 2947 days | 4% |
| Brooke Hammond | 10/10 | 2989 days | 4% |
| Erin Polcyn Sailer | 8/10 | 3136 days | 3% |
| Antoine Greiller | 10/10 | 3210 days | 3% |
| Nick Coulson | 10/10 | 3221 days | 3% |
| Jen Sau | 9/10 | 3308 days | 3% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3330 days | 3% |
| Ernest paw | 10/10 | 3338 days | 3% |
| Darlene | 10/10 | 3339 days | 3% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Thomas Blom | 8/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| exts | 10/10 | 3643 days | 2% |
| Fiona McGregor | 10/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Nigel Gee | 10/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
| Bruce Paterson | 10/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
| caravan1 | 10/10 | 4311 days | 0% |
| Shannan Scott | 10/10 | 4434 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Awastone experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Awastone experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Awastone experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.