Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kauwhata Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Te Kauwhata Domain
Valid Reviews
68 Valid Reviews
The Te Kauwhata Domain experience has a total of 75 reviews. There are 68 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
87.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kauwhata Domain valid reviews is 87.94% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
87.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marie | 10/10 | 37 days | 100% |
| Ella | 10/10 | 68 days | 100% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 98 days | 100% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 341 days | 93% |
| Cam an | 5/10 | 372 days | 70% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 372 days | 86% |
| rae | 9/10 | 402 days | 90% |
| Krys | 9/10 | 402 days | 90% |
| Cucamest | 10/10 | 433 days | 89% |
| Millie | 9/10 | 463 days | 87% |
| Jill | 8/10 | 586 days | 78% |
| Guest | 9/10 | 616 days | 77% |
| Nadja | 10/10 | 707 days | 71% |
| Dee | 7/10 | 738 days | 63% |
| Brie | 6/10 | 738 days | 59% |
| Ruta | 1/10 | 768 days | 25% |
| Malcolm Greenhalgh | 8/10 | 799 days | 62% |
| Jan | 8/10 | 799 days | 62% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 860 days | 56% |
| Bobbie | 10/10 | 891 days | 54% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 952 days | 47% |
| wvdbos | 8/10 | 982 days | 44% |
| sarah penney | 9/10 | 982 days | 44% |
| Steve Hawes | 10/10 | 1013 days | 41% |
| Camila | 10/10 | 1013 days | 41% |
| Joakim | 8/10 | 1041 days | 38% |
| Anya | 10/10 | 1041 days | 39% |
| Odette | 10/10 | 1041 days | 39% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 1041 days | 38% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1072 days | 36% |
| Adrian | 10/10 | 1072 days | 36% |
| Geri Ng | 10/10 | 1103 days | 33% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 1133 days | 30% |
| Dave | 10/10 | 1164 days | 29% |
| Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 1164 days | 28% |
| Chloe | 8/10 | 1256 days | 21% |
| Eyisha | 7/10 | 1286 days | 18% |
| Jose | 10/10 | 1378 days | 15% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1378 days | 15% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 1437 days | 12% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 1437 days | 12% |
| Roque | 10/10 | 1771 days | 3% |
| Aj | 10/10 | 1863 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1894 days | 3% |
| Karen | 9/10 | 1924 days | 3% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2108 days | 3% |
| Merche | 9/10 | 2137 days | 2% |
| Silly American | 10/10 | 2168 days | 2% |
| Gap year | 10/10 | 2199 days | 2% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 2199 days | 2% |
| Jun | 9/10 | 2229 days | 2% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 2229 days | 2% |
| Bartezz | 8/10 | 2229 days | 2% |
| Ancient Uncle | 10/10 | 2260 days | 2% |
| Marty | 8/10 | 2290 days | 2% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
| Georgia Trompf | 9/10 | 2533 days | 2% |
| Trudy Worboys | 10/10 | 2533 days | 2% |
| Liv | 10/10 | 2564 days | 2% |
| The Flip Flop Family | 10/10 | 2655 days | 1% |
| CHA LEMAY | 9/10 | 2808 days | 1% |
| Fivetogether | 9/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| Muhammad fayadh Mad jamil | 8/10 | 2867 days | 1% |
| Flavia Confalonieri | 7/10 | 2941 days | 1% |
| Lucy Winfield | 5/10 | 3065 days | 0% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 3071 days | 1% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3161 days | 0% |
| Christine Allgaier | 10/10 | 3214 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kauwhata Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.