Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
68 Valid Reviews
The Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground experience has a total of 69 reviews. There are 68 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 28 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.97% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground valid reviews is 83.97% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 68 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
13% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
69.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 69.38% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| jolly | 6/10 | 71 days | 88% |
| Emily | 8/10 | 132 days | 99% |
| Dalton | 10/10 | 193 days | 100% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 377 days | 94% |
| Gabija Baugirdaite | 10/10 | 377 days | 94% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 406 days | 93% |
| Michael | 9/10 | 529 days | 85% |
| gazza | 7/10 | 559 days | 78% |
| Max | 9/10 | 712 days | 72% |
| Jess Cullen | 8/10 | 743 days | 69% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 802 days | 65% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 894 days | 55% |
| gazza | 5/10 | 986 days | 35% |
| Vicki | 10/10 | 1046 days | 40% |
| Emer | 9/10 | 1047 days | 40% |
| Rach | 10/10 | 1077 days | 38% |
| Kbee | 10/10 | 1259 days | 24% |
| Amber | 10/10 | 1501 days | 11% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 1532 days | 10% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 1563 days | 9% |
| Nadia | 10/10 | 1563 days | 9% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 1563 days | 9% |
| Jo | 10/10 | 1624 days | 7% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1654 days | 7% |
| Ian & Wendy | 10/10 | 1867 days | 5% |
| Emma Guthrie | 9/10 | 1929 days | 5% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 1929 days | 5% |
| Martin Hansen | 10/10 | 1990 days | 5% |
| Mystery van | 10/10 | 2082 days | 4% |
| Juleen and Gareth | 10/10 | 2112 days | 4% |
| Emma & Tom | 10/10 | 2173 days | 4% |
| Ceri | 9/10 | 2232 days | 4% |
| Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2232 days | 4% |
| Doug | 10/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
| Renske | 8/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
| Sally | 10/10 | 2294 days | 4% |
| Jakob Simons | 8/10 | 2324 days | 4% |
| Kenza | 8/10 | 2355 days | 4% |
| Kim | 7/10 | 2416 days | 3% |
| Anna | 7/10 | 2569 days | 3% |
| Alyson Reid | 10/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Fedor Bezrukov | 10/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 2872 days | 3% |
| Kaisu | 9/10 | 2900 days | 3% |
| Brandon | 9/10 | 2923 days | 3% |
| Gruet Titaina | 9/10 | 3071 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
| Steffen Paul | 9/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 3657 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
| Kamil Benes | 9/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Jiri Blecha | 9/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 6/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
| margaret rose | 3/10 | 3815 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 3845 days | 1% |
| Helen Olsson | 10/10 | 4006 days | 0% |
| Igor | 9/10 | 4030 days | 0% |
| Alexis Redor | 4/10 | 4061 days | 0% |
| Jesse Flynn | 10/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
| Ngaire Davies | 2/10 | 4072 days | 0% |
| Paul Davies | 4/10 | 4072 days | 0% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 8/10 | 4087 days | 0% |
| Clodec | 8/10 | 4390 days | 1% |
| Amiot Cyriane | 5/10 | 4399 days | 0% |
| Lea Bulle | 8/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
| Mary Neustroski | 2/10 | 4409 days | 0% |
| Ann Sinclair | 5/10 | 4413 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kina Beach Reserve Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.09% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.