Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for McLaren Falls Camping Area.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
McLaren Falls Camping Area
Valid Reviews
86 Valid Reviews
The McLaren Falls Camping Area experience has a total of 90 reviews. There are 86 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 86 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 52 |
|
60% |
| 9/10 | 19 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
91.63% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the McLaren Falls Camping Area valid reviews is 91.63% and is based on 86 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
34 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 86 valid reviews, the experience has 34 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
62% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the McLaren Falls Camping Area face-to-face reviews is 92.94% and is based on 34 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beth | 7/10 | 386 days | 100% |
| Stella Kinne | 9/10 | 721 days | 82% |
| Marjolein van der Linden | 10/10 | 811 days | 73% |
| The planned traveler | 9/10 | 842 days | 69% |
| Mo Allgood | 8/10 | 903 days | 61% |
| Maurice | 1/10 | 1207 days | 13% |
| Liamdelaney@outlook.com | 10/10 | 1360 days | 20% |
| ML | 10/10 | 1755 days | 6% |
| Sue Atkinson | 10/10 | 1847 days | 6% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
| Delphine | 10/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
| Donkcfull | 10/10 | 2333 days | 4% |
| Rachael | 9/10 | 2333 days | 4% |
| Arno Nym | 3/10 | 2364 days | 2% |
| Dave | 5/10 | 2394 days | 3% |
| Axel | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
| Kevin Sims | 9/10 | 2578 days | 4% |
| Chris & Peg | 10/10 | 2578 days | 4% |
| Candice Lebertois | 10/10 | 2584 days | 4% |
| Magenta McHalick | 10/10 | 2603 days | 3% |
| Greg Wilson | 9/10 | 2740 days | 4% |
| Michael Smith | 9/10 | 2761 days | 3% |
| Dalton Howden | 8/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
| Haley Everitt | 10/10 | 2865 days | 3% |
| Maartje Mulders | 9/10 | 2908 days | 3% |
| Elena Rusalen | 7/10 | 2916 days | 3% |
| Sophie Lambert Russell | 10/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| Gail Hunter | 10/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
| Lisa Erikssen | 10/10 | 2978 days | 3% |
| Melanie | 9/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
| Dominique | 10/10 | 3044 days | 3% |
| Heike Buchmann | 10/10 | 3044 days | 3% |
| Youri de Wit | 9/10 | 3060 days | 3% |
| Alejandro Cavallo | 9/10 | 3071 days | 3% |
| Jonathan Schmoor | 10/10 | 3096 days | 3% |
| Raden Roekmi | 10/10 | 3232 days | 2% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| Eva Neumann | 9/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
| Sarah Dial | 7/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| Daniel Weber | 8/10 | 3294 days | 2% |
| Damian | 10/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
| Valerie Bernardini | 10/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
| Florence | 7/10 | 3306 days | 2% |
| Julie Miehling | 10/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
| Nico Wedel | 8/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
| Pablo Garcia | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Patrick Baritz | 9/10 | 3343 days | 2% |
| Mikkel Palleson | 10/10 | 3349 days | 2% |
| Florian Mueller | 9/10 | 3354 days | 2% |
| Kathanina Jasik | 10/10 | 3362 days | 2% |
| Bryant Faaola | 9/10 | 3368 days | 2% |
| Hannah Green | 10/10 | 3374 days | 2% |
| Emmy Poole | 10/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
| Chester Martin | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Sanna | 10/10 | 3629 days | 2% |
| Fleur Oskamp | 9/10 | 3647 days | 1% |
| Yannick | 10/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Ines | 7/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| Riaan and Rene | 5/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| Elles Janssen | 10/10 | 3725 days | 1% |
| Oliver Powles | 10/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| tim winders | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
| Becky | 10/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 10/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Paolo Cases | 10/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Jan Kerkhoff | 9/10 | 4043 days | 0% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 9/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 9/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Immo Kern | 10/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
| M & J Castle | 10/10 | 4067 days | 0% |
| Victor Herranz | 10/10 | 4070 days | 0% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
| Johannes J | 10/10 | 4220 days | 0% |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
| Iban Dupont | 10/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Guillaume Boudrand | 10/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| N smith | 10/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
| Erik Muchembled | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
| Andre and Marina | 10/10 | 4437 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 10/10 | 4463 days | 1% |
| Jan and Pedi | 10/10 | 4485 days | 1% |
| JadesWorld | 10/10 | 4890 days | 1% |
| Gea Middelbos | 8/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. McLaren Falls Camping Area does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.