Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ahuriri Bridge Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Ahuriri Bridge Campsite
Valid Reviews
48 Valid Reviews
The Ahuriri Bridge Campsite experience has a total of 48 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 48 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 48 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
13% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
23% |
| 6/10 | 8 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
72.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahuriri Bridge Campsite valid reviews is 72.29% and is based on 48 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
71.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stuff | 9/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Emma | 6/10 | 70 days | 87% |
| Fabian | 8/10 | 101 days | 99% |
| Holly | 6/10 | 315 days | 82% |
| moondancer | 7/10 | 436 days | 84% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 7/10 | 681 days | 69% |
| Hannah L | 10/10 | 801 days | 64% |
| Brigette | 4/10 | 801 days | 42% |
| Tom | 7/10 | 801 days | 59% |
| Rugby | 5/10 | 893 days | 42% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1076 days | 32% |
| Lisa | 7/10 | 1166 days | 28% |
| Johnboy | 8/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
| $p | 4/10 | 1441 days | 9% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 1500 days | 11% |
| Lydia | 8/10 | 1592 days | 8% |
| Phil | 10/10 | 1623 days | 7% |
| Edward | 8/10 | 1653 days | 6% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 1837 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 1897 days | 4% |
| Kieron | 5/10 | 2111 days | 3% |
| Mike | 6/10 | 2262 days | 3% |
| JT | 9/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
| Andy Bond | 7/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2415 days | 3% |
| Chelsea | 6/10 | 2476 days | 3% |
| Candy | 6/10 | 2537 days | 3% |
| Saleena Ham | 5/10 | 2537 days | 2% |
| Kat | 7/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
| Lauren Glass | 9/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
| Lizzie V | 7/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Troels Karlsen | 9/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| Maryline Salter | 8/10 | 2663 days | 3% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 8/10 | 2704 days | 3% |
| Kerry Lee | 7/10 | 2932 days | 2% |
| H Harcourt | 7/10 | 3036 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Josie Suska | 8/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Jacqui Hutchins | 5/10 | 3337 days | 1% |
| Sarah Dial | 9/10 | 3358 days | 2% |
| Miguel | 6/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 3998 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 6/10 | 3998 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 8/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 8/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 8/10 | 4180 days | 0% |
| Loesje | 8/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ahuriri Bridge Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
6.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.