Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Little Waipa Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Little Waipa Reserve

Valid Reviews

53 Valid Reviews

The Little Waipa Reserve experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 53 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 53 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
43%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 4
8%
7/10 8
15%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 2
4%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

84.34% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Little Waipa Reserve valid reviews is 84.34% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.45%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Louise 10/10 235 days 100%
Trevor 4/10 266 days 65%
Doriane 9/10 295 days 97%
Jade Ballantine 10/10 357 days 96%
Jost 10/10 357 days 96%
Mandy 10/10 357 days 96%
117izy 6/10 387 days 81%
Maartje 8/10 448 days 90%
Benjamin 9/10 448 days 91%
Matthew 8/10 479 days 88%
RM 9/10 540 days 85%
Paul 10/10 571 days 84%
Nicolas 7/10 660 days 72%
Nikos 8/10 660 days 76%
Louisa Runge 7/10 660 days 72%
Janae c 7/10 691 days 70%
Lukyzee 9/10 691 days 74%
GRANMA 10/10 752 days 70%
Max maxwell 10/10 1056 days 40%
Olga 7/10 1056 days 37%
Time Out 9/10 1513 days 11%
Allen Goodall 10/10 1787 days 5%
Rod Brown 10/10 2093 days 5%
John Plane 10/10 2152 days 4%
Roland Hänni 8/10 2183 days 4%
Alyson Reid 7/10 2500 days 3%
Haley Everitt 3/10 2745 days 2%
Helen Quirk 9/10 2846 days 3%
Alison Males 4/10 2880 days 2%
Mark 10/10 2881 days 3%
Maaike Goudriaan 10/10 2881 days 3%
Michelle Smit 10/10 3065 days 3%
Lauren Smith 10/10 3085 days 3%
Denise Farr 10/10 3089 days 3%
Wiola and Nico 1/10 3110 days 1%
Trent Davis 9/10 3148 days 2%
Fernando Silva 9/10 3159 days 2%
Tony Maroulis 10/10 3214 days 2%
Vernesa Smolcic 10/10 3242 days 2%
Bryant Faaola 7/10 3247 days 2%
Miaomace 10/10 3285 days 2%
Victoria 10/10 3339 days 2%
Miguel 9/10 3553 days 2%
Ines 7/10 3585 days 1%
John Treasure 6/10 3947 days 1%
Jordan and Marielle 10/10 3978 days 1%
arnaud paquet 10/10 4070 days 1%
Rosa Fossi 10/10 4100 days 0%
Memain 7/10 4250 days 0%
Konza 6/10 4251 days 0%
Clive 9/10 4312 days 0%
Andrew K 10/10 4343 days 0%
hoppy 9/10 4343 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Little Waipa Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.74% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.