G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Firth Tower Overnight Camping.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
38 Valid Reviews
The Firth Tower Overnight Camping experience has a total of 39 reviews. There are 38 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 38 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.16% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Firth Tower Overnight Camping valid reviews is 88.16% and is based on 38 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
91.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Diana | 9/10 | 51 days | 99% |
Natasha | 10/10 | 51 days | 100% |
Paul S | 10/10 | 265 days | 96% |
Mark | 8/10 | 265 days | 94% |
Gunnar&Maria | 8/10 | 356 days | 91% |
Aden Stares | 9/10 | 386 days | 91% |
Liam Dent | 9/10 | 386 days | 91% |
Lini | 9/10 | 417 days | 89% |
Suzanne p | 9/10 | 631 days | 77% |
Inge | 9/10 | 690 days | 72% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 751 days | 68% |
Mo Allgood | 10/10 | 782 days | 65% |
Minion mobile | 10/10 | 1817 days | 5% |
Kate Shields | 9/10 | 1878 days | 5% |
Mik Jennings | 9/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Marion & Leonie | 10/10 | 2120 days | 4% |
Sam & Mal | 10/10 | 2151 days | 4% |
Steffi | 8/10 | 2212 days | 4% |
Patricio Vidal | 10/10 | 2212 days | 4% |
Bman | 8/10 | 2243 days | 4% |
Emma Higgins | 9/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
May | 8/10 | 2304 days | 4% |
Kim & Gordon | 7/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Maddie F | 8/10 | 2452 days | 2% |
Ronald Daigneault | 8/10 | 2540 days | 2% |
Viola Cube | 10/10 | 2685 days | 3% |
Kirsten Hurst | 10/10 | 2792 days | 3% |
Sue Horstra | 9/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
Barbara Blair | 7/10 | 2950 days | 3% |
Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3143 days | 2% |
Julia Summa | 10/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
Thais Norberland | 8/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
Stephanie | 9/10 | 3497 days | 2% |
Silke | 9/10 | 3594 days | 1% |
Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 7/10 | 3887 days | 1% |
L P | 8/10 | 4161 days | 0% |
Mycall | 7/10 | 4252 days | 0% |
David Restell | 9/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Firth Tower Overnight Camping does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.