Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dive North.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Dive North experience has a total of 96 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 96 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 93 |
|
97% |
9/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.69% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dive North valid reviews is 99.69% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
99.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Halligan | 10/10 | 3356 days | 100% |
Marianne Leclerco | 10/10 | 3423 days | 56% |
Steven Goossens | 10/10 | 3448 days | 91% |
Chris Ru | 10/10 | 3448 days | 91% |
Christin Winter | 10/10 | 3449 days | 91% |
Maud Eskes | 10/10 | 3509 days | 85% |
Brooke Dees | 10/10 | 3509 days | 85% |
Johanna Mabille | 10/10 | 3541 days | 82% |
Felix Eberhard | 10/10 | 3601 days | 76% |
Danny Hughes | 10/10 | 3662 days | 70% |
Lee Gilson | 10/10 | 3662 days | 70% |
Magalie Gilles | 10/10 | 3662 days | 70% |
Anthony Baker | 10/10 | 3662 days | 70% |
Matthew Durham | 10/10 | 3662 days | 70% |
Weston Newman | 10/10 | 3663 days | 70% |
Lydia Downey | 10/10 | 3693 days | 67% |
Jon S | 10/10 | 3693 days | 67% |
Kevin Hopper | 10/10 | 3721 days | 64% |
Marion Butz | 10/10 | 3721 days | 64% |
James Martin | 10/10 | 3752 days | 61% |
Joel Tennant | 10/10 | 3752 days | 61% |
Dominique Brandl | 10/10 | 3813 days | 55% |
Christine Zumbeck | 10/10 | 3813 days | 55% |
Philip Ayles | 10/10 | 3844 days | 52% |
Hayden | 10/10 | 3874 days | 49% |
bryce | 10/10 | 3906 days | 45% |
Gunther Kothen | 10/10 | 4028 days | 33% |
Charli & Ben | 10/10 | 4028 days | 33% |
Dave Macleod | 10/10 | 4028 days | 33% |
rick kaminer | 10/10 | 4087 days | 27% |
Josch Beh | 10/10 | 4087 days | 27% |
Matthew Blaikie | 10/10 | 4087 days | 27% |
Mandy Dawson | 9/10 | 4087 days | 27% |
Tess Idiens | 10/10 | 4117 days | 24% |
Mikaël Krummen | 10/10 | 4118 days | 24% |
Brian Barnard | 10/10 | 4210 days | 15% |
Alix | 10/10 | 4210 days | 15% |
sebastian krause | 10/10 | 4302 days | 6% |
Annika Strönisch | 10/10 | 4302 days | 6% |
Sarah Ling | 10/10 | 4332 days | 3% |
Lydia Lowe | 10/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
Debbie hogan | 10/10 | 4393 days | 49% |
Ellen Herrlin | 10/10 | 4393 days | 49% |
Brendon | 10/10 | 4424 days | 49% |
Rob | 10/10 | 4424 days | 49% |
JamesR | 10/10 | 4424 days | 49% |
david kirk | 10/10 | 4424 days | 49% |
Bhakti Patel | 10/10 | 4452 days | 49% |
bernd | 10/10 | 4452 days | 49% |
Amy Coolidge | 10/10 | 4452 days | 49% |
Don Mueller | 10/10 | 4452 days | 49% |
Katie Morgan | 10/10 | 4482 days | 49% |
barbara nielsen | 10/10 | 4483 days | 49% |
Stine Bøttern | 10/10 | 4483 days | 49% |
embatfish | 10/10 | 4514 days | 49% |
christie wood | 10/10 | 4514 days | 49% |
Mellow | 10/10 | 4544 days | 49% |
MelNZ | 10/10 | 4636 days | 49% |
ToGy | 10/10 | 4789 days | 49% |
EtienneCornu | 10/10 | 4818 days | 49% |
francis | 10/10 | 4849 days | 49% |
melika | 10/10 | 4849 days | 49% |
esty6 | 10/10 | 4849 days | 49% |
cerys1979 | 10/10 | 4849 days | 49% |
jamieroysimmonds | 10/10 | 4880 days | 49% |
rudling36 | 10/10 | 4941 days | 49% |
sftyler | 10/10 | 4941 days | 49% |
eoolsen | 10/10 | 4971 days | 49% |
jmark | 10/10 | 4971 days | 49% |
GenoReynoldo | 10/10 | 4971 days | 49% |
Kiedo | 10/10 | 5063 days | 49% |
gillwalsh | 10/10 | 5094 days | 49% |
ocds4321 | 10/10 | 5094 days | 49% |
toquade | 10/10 | 5124 days | 49% |
Tajon | 10/10 | 5124 days | 49% |
aragonesa | 10/10 | 5124 days | 49% |
Kris_Lim | 10/10 | 5124 days | 49% |
Glen_Mitchell | 10/10 | 5155 days | 49% |
baz15 | 10/10 | 5155 days | 49% |
hoellund | 10/10 | 5183 days | 49% |
bttrix | 10/10 | 5183 days | 49% |
nigel275 | 9/10 | 5183 days | 49% |
leonsenchenko | 10/10 | 5183 days | 49% |
lightoverloard | 10/10 | 5183 days | 49% |
Lodesman | 10/10 | 5214 days | 49% |
rivendell | 10/10 | 5214 days | 49% |
illgetubutla | 10/10 | 5214 days | 49% |
drross | 10/10 | 5245 days | 49% |
nickjjjjbbbb | 10/10 | 5245 days | 49% |
berniesheehan | 10/10 | 5275 days | 49% |
JeanLouis | 10/10 | 5275 days | 49% |
OliviaDW | 10/10 | 5275 days | 49% |
Scaife | 10/10 | 5275 days | 49% |
Kristien | 10/10 | 5275 days | 49% |
Malcolm Glad | 9/10 | 5533 days | 28% |
Alan_Maich | 10/10 | 5579 days | 49% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dive North experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.55% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 63 days. However the Dive North experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dive North experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.49% |
198 | -3.51% |
199 | -3.53% |
200 | -3.55% |
201 | -3.56% |
202 | -3.58% |
203 | -3.60% |
… | … |
0.32% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.