Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Foulwind Walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cape Foulwind Walkway
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Cape Foulwind Walkway experience has a total of 84 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway valid reviews is 88.45% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.96% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway face-to-face reviews is 88.96% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.76%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Becky Fox | 8/10 | 2943 days | 100% |
| Emma Millett | 8/10 | 2943 days | 100% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 10/10 | 2988 days | 99% |
| Daphne Andrey | 8/10 | 2990 days | 97% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2997 days | 97% |
| Rocco | 10/10 | 3240 days | 81% |
| Sylvain Blanchet | 8/10 | 3291 days | 76% |
| Ronja and Lena | 8/10 | 3341 days | 72% |
| Brian Lexmond | 6/10 | 3961 days | 25% |
| Julian Kuemme | 9/10 | 3964 days | 29% |
| Max Backelandt | 9/10 | 3968 days | 29% |
| Austin Johns | 9/10 | 3991 days | 27% |
| Johanna Kofler | 8/10 | 3992 days | 27% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 9/10 | 3994 days | 27% |
| Helen McKevitt | 9/10 | 3995 days | 27% |
| Marion Busch | 9/10 | 4004 days | 26% |
| M K | 10/10 | 4030 days | 25% |
| Cornelia Stark | 10/10 | 4045 days | 24% |
| Azteca | 6/10 | 4232 days | 9% |
| hendrik king | 6/10 | 4262 days | 7% |
| Stefan AuRich | 9/10 | 4362 days | 1% |
| John and Chris Creese | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 4447 days | 36% |
| Fries | 10/10 | 4728 days | 36% |
| Les Barnes | 9/10 | 4728 days | 36% |
| Rick Moth | 9/10 | 4728 days | 36% |
| Josef | 9/10 | 4729 days | 36% |
| Seth & Carla | 9/10 | 4733 days | 36% |
| Butz | 8/10 | 4734 days | 35% |
| Steve Goodyear | 9/10 | 4740 days | 36% |
| Frank Krivauek | 8/10 | 4742 days | 35% |
| Brian Frost | 10/10 | 4742 days | 36% |
| Volker Neumeyer | 9/10 | 4743 days | 36% |
| Tom Connis | 8/10 | 4747 days | 35% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 4748 days | 36% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 4814 days | 36% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 4814 days | 36% |
| damaca | 9/10 | 4901 days | 36% |
| jhwjhw | 8/10 | 5024 days | 35% |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 5073 days | 36% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 5075 days | 36% |
| Juerg & Denise Zuesli | 10/10 | 5078 days | 36% |
| Chris & Anne Pearson | 10/10 | 5079 days | 36% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5085 days | 35% |
| Matthys Kikke | 9/10 | 5089 days | 36% |
| Edwards | 9/10 | 5092 days | 36% |
| Jennie McIver | 9/10 | 5100 days | 36% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5101 days | 36% |
| Robert Cox | 9/10 | 5104 days | 36% |
| Mike and Alice Powner | 8/10 | 5104 days | 35% |
| Webster | 10/10 | 5106 days | 36% |
| Gordon Daniels | 4/10 | 5108 days | 24% |
| Niels Van Welsenes | 8/10 | 5113 days | 35% |
| Risch & Seybold | 10/10 | 5432 days | 36% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5438 days | 36% |
| Evans | 7/10 | 5438 days | 34% |
| Jana Steve | 10/10 | 5444 days | 36% |
| Tom Bos | 8/10 | 5445 days | 35% |
| Giaque | 9/10 | 5456 days | 36% |
| Armand | 8/10 | 5464 days | 35% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 5467 days | 36% |
| kararina Kosten | 10/10 | 5472 days | 36% |
| Birgit Haver | 10/10 | 5472 days | 36% |
| Hugli | 9/10 | 5483 days | 36% |
| Chris Kevin | 10/10 | 5487 days | 36% |
| Omar Frenchy | 9/10 | 5487 days | 36% |
| Catherine Clavel | 9/10 | 5487 days | 36% |
| Bo Moenstead | 9/10 | 5487 days | 36% |
| Nigel Armstrong | 10/10 | 5489 days | 36% |
| Colin Morbey | 8/10 | 5492 days | 35% |
| Johan Vaartjes | 8/10 | 5494 days | 35% |
| Connie Graae | 9/10 | 5495 days | 36% |
| Greg Kennedy | 10/10 | 5497 days | 36% |
| Heinrich Hax | 10/10 | 5498 days | 36% |
| Heino keyssler | 10/10 | 5498 days | 36% |
| Decuq | 8/10 | 5551 days | 35% |
| Simon Bartholomew | 8/10 | 5552 days | 35% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5567 days | 36% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 5570 days | 36% |
| HansH1 | 10/10 | 5779 days | 36% |
| StephaineFrance | 8/10 | 5784 days | 35% |
| Enno Brehm | 8/10 | 5796 days | 35% |
| AndrewW | 8/10 | 5796 days | 35% |
| Rissmann | 9/10 | 5800 days | 36% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Foulwind Walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.