Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Kidnappers Walking Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
59 Valid Reviews
The Cape Kidnappers Walking Track experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.97% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Kidnappers Walking Track valid reviews is 87.97% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
56 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 56 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 56 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
41% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.32% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Kidnappers Walking Track face-to-face reviews is 87.32% and is based on 56 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dani | 10/10 | 1133 days | 100% |
| Maddie F | 7/10 | 2834 days | 9% |
| Lizzie Edmonds | 8/10 | 2955 days | 8% |
| Andrea Mueller | 9/10 | 3201 days | 7% |
| Simon Briens | 7/10 | 3245 days | 6% |
| Kolar | 8/10 | 3253 days | 7% |
| Riccardo | 9/10 | 3253 days | 7% |
| Helna Saumanova | 10/10 | 3253 days | 7% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 10/10 | 3324 days | 6% |
| Benjamin Schyler | 7/10 | 3536 days | 5% |
| Laura Constans | 9/10 | 3536 days | 5% |
| Yoomm | 8/10 | 3563 days | 5% |
| Paul Larauze | 8/10 | 3566 days | 5% |
| Adam Pulkrabek | 9/10 | 3573 days | 5% |
| Simone De Angiou | 9/10 | 3588 days | 5% |
| Tatiana Racheneau | 10/10 | 3612 days | 5% |
| Annika Locker | 8/10 | 3614 days | 4% |
| Valerie Balcom | 9/10 | 3625 days | 4% |
| Linda and Gunther | 9/10 | 3643 days | 4% |
| Elsa Caniato | 7/10 | 3660 days | 4% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 8/10 | 3704 days | 4% |
| Eva Marsikova | 9/10 | 3926 days | 3% |
| Jurgen Moors | 10/10 | 4029 days | 2% |
| Zuzana Holubova | 10/10 | 4271 days | 1% |
| Christopher Buch Madsen | 9/10 | 4295 days | 0% |
| Miriam Grund | 9/10 | 4304 days | 0% |
| Pierre Gentile | 8/10 | 4311 days | 0% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Fraule-Emmanuelle De Rouqmout | 8/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Pier Durand | 9/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Serena Poggioli | 9/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Luca Willensrock | 8/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 9/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Reinhard Boettcher | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Angelika Bottcher | 8/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Ramon Keller | 9/10 | 4745 days | 3% |
| Vitek | 10/10 | 5034 days | 3% |
| Russell Eames | 10/10 | 5042 days | 3% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 5043 days | 3% |
| Marjolein Hartsuiker | 10/10 | 5045 days | 3% |
| Magda Savels | 9/10 | 5052 days | 3% |
| Soren Storeboerg | 8/10 | 5056 days | 3% |
| Hans Bos | 8/10 | 5122 days | 3% |
| Ute Janich | 10/10 | 5347 days | 3% |
| Christoph & Maria | 10/10 | 5386 days | 3% |
| Janey Chamberlain | 8/10 | 5387 days | 3% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5390 days | 3% |
| Barnhoorh | 8/10 | 5396 days | 3% |
| M Holierhoek | 7/10 | 5398 days | 3% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5738 days | 3% |
| George Lepple | 10/10 | 5754 days | 3% |
| Phil Bruce | 9/10 | 5767 days | 3% |
| Wetzel | 9/10 | 5768 days | 3% |
| Roos | 10/10 | 5775 days | 3% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 5787 days | 3% |
| Chris Kevin | 9/10 | 5798 days | 3% |
| selinab | 9/10 | 5844 days | 3% |
| Solveig Mosinski | 10/10 | 5863 days | 3% |
| StijnH | 9/10 | 6112 days | 3% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Kidnappers Walking Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.