Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

122 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 125 reviews. There are 122 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 77
63%
9/10 24
20%
8/10 11
9%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.95% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.95% and is based on 122 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 122 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.39%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Anaïs 10/10 51 days 100%
Monika 10/10 265 days 96%
Joanna 10/10 325 days 94%
Sue 10/10 325 days 94%
Jana 10/10 325 days 94%
Celeste 10/10 356 days 93%
Jimothyhike 10/10 447 days 89%
Dee Sage 10/10 447 days 89%
Daniel 10/10 631 days 77%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 631 days 77%
simon 10/10 659 days 75%
Juju 6/10 690 days 63%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 690 days 73%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 690 days 72%
Florian S. 4/10 721 days 46%
Sophie 10/10 721 days 70%
Deb 9/10 721 days 70%
Daniel 10/10 751 days 68%
Alec 10/10 1055 days 39%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1055 days 39%
Melissa 10/10 1086 days 36%
Catherine 10/10 1330 days 19%
Helen 6/10 1330 days 16%
Jane 10/10 1389 days 16%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1420 days 14%
Mitch 10/10 1420 days 14%
ZMad 10/10 1481 days 12%
Abi 8/10 1512 days 10%
Aaron 10/10 1634 days 7%
Marika Naylor 10/10 1634 days 7%
Lisa 10/10 1726 days 6%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 1726 days 6%
Neil 10/10 1755 days 5%
Hatessandflys 10/10 1755 days 5%
Sue 10/10 1755 days 5%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 1755 days 5%
Niko Schachner 4/10 1786 days 3%
Mark 10/10 1786 days 5%
Achim 10/10 1786 days 5%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 1786 days 5%
Lukas 10/10 1817 days 5%
Tom McKernan 10/10 1847 days 5%
Gil 10/10 1847 days 5%
Katherine Ong 10/10 1878 days 5%
Pedro 9/10 2120 days 4%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2151 days 4%
Barry 10/10 2151 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2151 days 4%
Macker 8/10 2212 days 4%
Guillaume 10/10 2273 days 4%
Karli18 9/10 2396 days 4%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2396 days 4%
Jenny 10/10 2396 days 4%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2457 days 4%
Nat 10/10 2457 days 4%
The Weathersons 8/10 2470 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2498 days 4%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2514 days 4%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2515 days 4%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 2547 days 4%
Edwin Bos 10/10 2557 days 4%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 2582 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 2591 days 3%
Owen Dilling 10/10 2608 days 3%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2608 days 3%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 2727 days 3%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 2782 days 3%
Ann Teeters 10/10 2822 days 3%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 2850 days 3%
Alan Brown 9/10 2850 days 3%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 2864 days 3%
Amy Smith 9/10 2870 days 3%
Katie Ball 10/10 2883 days 3%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3126 days 2%
Roland Syha 10/10 3151 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3162 days 2%
Max 7/10 3169 days 2%
Werner Langer 10/10 3187 days 2%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3199 days 2%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3200 days 2%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3201 days 2%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3201 days 2%
Steve Newton 10/10 3222 days 2%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3230 days 2%
R Werder 10/10 3231 days 2%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3244 days 2%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3247 days 2%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3270 days 2%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3278 days 2%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3278 days 2%
Alan White 10/10 3320 days 2%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3477 days 2%
ct2034 10/10 3522 days 2%
Alistair Millward 9/10 3549 days 2%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 3581 days 2%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 3616 days 1%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 3643 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 3704 days 1%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 3704 days 1%
Tina Johnson 10/10 3796 days 1%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 3826 days 1%
Bob Morrison 9/10 3857 days 1%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 3918 days 1%
Monique Monique 9/10 3946 days 1%
Paul W 9/10 3946 days 1%
Michael Uebe 10/10 3949 days 0%
Helen King 9/10 4099 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4276 days 0%
Julian Roots 8/10 4283 days 0%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4364 days 0%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4382 days 1%
Josef 9/10 4658 days 1%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 4665 days 0%
Arron 10/10 4677 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 4677 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 4953 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 4983 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 4998 days 1%
Mark 8/10 5021 days 1%
John 9/10 5026 days 1%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5427 days 1%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5479 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.75% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 37 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
34 -0.69%
35 -0.71%
36 -0.73%
37 -0.75%
38 -0.77%
39 -0.79%
40 -0.81%

Balancing Adjustment

0.47% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.