Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
122 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 125 reviews. There are 122 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 77 |
|
63% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.95% and is based on 122 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 122 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.39%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Anaïs | 10/10 | 51 days | 100% |
Monika | 10/10 | 265 days | 96% |
Joanna | 10/10 | 325 days | 94% |
Sue | 10/10 | 325 days | 94% |
Jana | 10/10 | 325 days | 94% |
Celeste | 10/10 | 356 days | 93% |
Jimothyhike | 10/10 | 447 days | 89% |
Dee Sage | 10/10 | 447 days | 89% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 631 days | 77% |
Sue and Scott Collington | 10/10 | 631 days | 77% |
simon | 10/10 | 659 days | 75% |
Juju | 6/10 | 690 days | 63% |
Jo Hopkinson | 10/10 | 690 days | 73% |
PAULA WALLACE | 9/10 | 690 days | 72% |
Florian S. | 4/10 | 721 days | 46% |
Sophie | 10/10 | 721 days | 70% |
Deb | 9/10 | 721 days | 70% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 751 days | 68% |
Alec | 10/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
Mike Whalen | 10/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1086 days | 36% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1330 days | 19% |
Helen | 6/10 | 1330 days | 16% |
Jane | 10/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 1420 days | 14% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 1420 days | 14% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1481 days | 12% |
Abi | 8/10 | 1512 days | 10% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 1634 days | 7% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 1634 days | 7% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 1726 days | 6% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 1726 days | 6% |
Neil | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 1786 days | 3% |
Mark | 10/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Achim | 10/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 1817 days | 5% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 1847 days | 5% |
Gil | 10/10 | 1847 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1878 days | 5% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 2120 days | 4% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2151 days | 4% |
Barry | 10/10 | 2151 days | 4% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2151 days | 4% |
Macker | 8/10 | 2212 days | 4% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
Nat | 10/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2470 days | 2% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 2498 days | 4% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 2514 days | 4% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 2515 days | 4% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 2557 days | 4% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 2582 days | 3% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 2591 days | 3% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 2608 days | 3% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 2608 days | 3% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 2727 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2782 days | 3% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 2822 days | 3% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 2870 days | 3% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 2883 days | 3% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 3126 days | 2% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 3151 days | 2% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 3162 days | 2% |
Max | 7/10 | 3169 days | 2% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 3200 days | 2% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 3231 days | 2% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3270 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 3826 days | 1% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 3857 days | 1% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3918 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 3949 days | 0% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 4099 days | 1% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
Josef | 9/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 4665 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 4953 days | 1% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4983 days | 1% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5479 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.75% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 37 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
34 | -0.69% |
35 | -0.71% |
36 | -0.73% |
37 | -0.75% |
38 | -0.77% |
39 | -0.79% |
40 | -0.81% |
… | … |
0.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.