Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Port Jackson Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Port Jackson Campsite

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Port Jackson Campsite experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 27
52%
9/10 19
37%
8/10 6
12%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

94.04% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite valid reviews is 94.04% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

22 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 52 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 8
36%
9/10 12
55%
8/10 2
9%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.73% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite face-to-face reviews is 92.73% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.79%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Jane 10/10 101 days 100%
Christopher 10/10 192 days 98%
Beth 8/10 376 days 91%
Rokki Bud 10/10 862 days 58%
Jacob Carrapetta 10/10 923 days 52%
Nicky 8/10 1166 days 29%
Hannah 10/10 1288 days 22%
Alex 10/10 1350 days 18%
Jenni 9/10 1592 days 8%
Gareth 10/10 1897 days 5%
Bert 9/10 1928 days 5%
Sheryll 10/10 2203 days 4%
Ashleigh 10/10 2231 days 4%
Krishna Ponguru 10/10 2354 days 4%
Michael Smith 9/10 2751 days 3%
Fabio Flepp 10/10 2939 days 3%
Paul Smith 8/10 2955 days 3%
Claire Buckham 10/10 2961 days 3%
James Oakes 10/10 2973 days 3%
Sarah Stone 9/10 3016 days 3%
Rima 9/10 3053 days 3%
Patrick Baritz 10/10 3333 days 2%
Dave O'Brien 9/10 3335 days 2%
Michael 10/10 3423 days 2%
Camille Guevel 10/10 3654 days 1%
Hans Munster 10/10 3668 days 1%
Matthias Bohmert 9/10 3690 days 1%
Jurgen Moors 10/10 3758 days 1%
James Russell 9/10 4005 days 1%
Hannah Watt 10/10 4005 days 1%
Mark Hofmann 9/10 4035 days 1%
Steven Lotrian 10/10 4043 days 1%
Clarissa Krote 10/10 4069 days 1%
Lane 10/10 4088 days 1%
sharyn wright 8/10 4119 days 0%
GN100 10/10 4119 days 0%
FlyingKiwiGirl 9/10 4363 days 0%
Nigel Shaw 10/10 4363 days 0%
Menu 9/10 4384 days 1%
Kathy Arthurs 8/10 4394 days 1%
Fabian Brand 9/10 4415 days 1%
Nora and Edward 9/10 4417 days 1%
Markus Frei 8/10 4745 days 1%
Jessica Marling 9/10 4768 days 1%
Mike & Suzann 9/10 4770 days 1%
Kaelin 10/10 4864 days 1%
Harald Schmidt 10/10 5110 days 1%
Sophie 9/10 5153 days 1%
Brent S 9/10 5484 days 1%
olafrick 9/10 5518 days 1%
Johannes & Jopke Fokkema 9/10 5844 days 1%
Lars 10/10 5867 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Port Jackson Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.45% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.