G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
174 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 178 reviews. There are 174 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
87.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 87.24% and is based on 174 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 174 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
82.58%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nico | 5/10 | 190 days | 77% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 252 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 283 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 311 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 342 days | 74% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 342 days | 90% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 342 days | 90% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 342 days | 95% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 342 days | 95% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 342 days | 97% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 342 days | 97% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 373 days | 94% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 403 days | 93% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 434 days | 92% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 463 days | 90% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 463 days | 90% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 983 days | 47% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1104 days | 35% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1134 days | 29% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1165 days | 30% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1225 days | 26% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1225 days | 26% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1256 days | 24% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1286 days | 22% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1317 days | 8% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1348 days | 19% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1438 days | 14% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1438 days | 14% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1682 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1803 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1803 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1924 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1924 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2109 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2169 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2169 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2352 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2413 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2475 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2475 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2502 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2503 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2503 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2595 days | 4% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2872 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2913 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2919 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2926 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 2990 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3067 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3073 days | 3% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3087 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3117 days | 3% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3161 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3167 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3177 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3232 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3232 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3321 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3416 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3419 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3488 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3504 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3508 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3516 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3538 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3542 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3544 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3549 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3602 days | 2% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3627 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3629 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3661 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3668 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3811 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3812 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3874 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3879 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 3939 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 3994 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4001 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4004 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4055 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4512 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4666 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4668 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5054 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5058 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5058 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5060 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5375 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5410 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5411 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5700 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5769 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5836 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5856 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6083 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6140 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.34% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.