Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2875 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2893 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2905 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2914 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 2971 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 2982 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 2985 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 2985 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 2990 days | 91% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 2990 days | 91% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 2990 days | 90% |
Luke | 8/10 | 2995 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 2995 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 2997 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 3015 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 3015 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 3018 days | 90% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3231 days | 75% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3231 days | 75% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3237 days | 75% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3240 days | 76% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3240 days | 75% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3240 days | 74% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3242 days | 74% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3242 days | 75% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3250 days | 73% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3253 days | 73% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3253 days | 74% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3253 days | 74% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3253 days | 75% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3254 days | 69% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3255 days | 75% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3255 days | 73% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3256 days | 69% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3262 days | 69% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3262 days | 74% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3264 days | 74% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3267 days | 73% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3268 days | 73% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3274 days | 73% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3280 days | 73% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3284 days | 73% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3300 days | 72% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3332 days | 70% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3336 days | 69% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3338 days | 68% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3339 days | 68% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3343 days | 68% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3352 days | 68% |
Till | 10/10 | 3352 days | 68% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3352 days | 68% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3611 days | 50% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3614 days | 47% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3614 days | 47% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3614 days | 50% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3658 days | 47% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3663 days | 47% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3675 days | 47% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3697 days | 45% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3956 days | 27% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3956 days | 28% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3960 days | 26% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3960 days | 15% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 3981 days | 26% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 3981 days | 24% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 3990 days | 25% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 3990 days | 26% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 3995 days | 25% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 3995 days | 25% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 4000 days | 24% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 4000 days | 25% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 4004 days | 25% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 4004 days | 25% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 4005 days | 23% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 4005 days | 24% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 4006 days | 24% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 4008 days | 24% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 4008 days | 24% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4008 days | 24% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 4008 days | 23% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 4008 days | 23% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 4014 days | 24% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 4015 days | 23% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 4015 days | 24% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 4020 days | 20% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 4036 days | 21% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 4036 days | 22% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4038 days | 22% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 4038 days | 22% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4040 days | 22% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 4043 days | 22% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4048 days | 22% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4329 days | 3% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4341 days | 2% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4344 days | 2% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4344 days | 2% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4346 days | 2% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4347 days | 2% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4350 days | 2% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4350 days | 2% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4354 days | 1% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4358 days | 1% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4358 days | 1% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4359 days | 1% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4364 days | 1% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4451 days | 34% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4453 days | 33% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4684 days | 33% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4686 days | 34% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4694 days | 34% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4728 days | 33% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4728 days | 34% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4729 days | 29% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4731 days | 33% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4732 days | 31% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4733 days | 33% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4734 days | 33% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4735 days | 34% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4736 days | 34% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4741 days | 33% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4749 days | 33% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4761 days | 33% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4761 days | 33% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4817 days | 33% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4821 days | 33% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 5030 days | 33% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5062 days | 33% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5063 days | 33% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5065 days | 34% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5068 days | 29% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5068 days | 34% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5070 days | 33% |
noname | 8/10 | 5070 days | 33% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5072 days | 33% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5075 days | 33% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5075 days | 31% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5076 days | 31% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5076 days | 34% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5076 days | 34% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5077 days | 33% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5078 days | 33% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5079 days | 33% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5080 days | 33% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5083 days | 33% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5085 days | 34% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5088 days | 33% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5088 days | 34% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5089 days | 33% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5090 days | 33% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5096 days | 33% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5100 days | 33% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5103 days | 33% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5103 days | 33% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5105 days | 29% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5106 days | 34% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5106 days | 31% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5112 days | 34% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5363 days | 33% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5363 days | 34% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5367 days | 34% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5383 days | 33% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5419 days | 33% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5424 days | 34% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5425 days | 34% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5428 days | 34% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5436 days | 34% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5436 days | 33% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5438 days | 33% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5451 days | 33% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5452 days | 33% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5453 days | 34% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5454 days | 33% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5456 days | 33% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5456 days | 29% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5457 days | 33% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5459 days | 33% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5460 days | 33% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5463 days | 33% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5472 days | 33% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5478 days | 33% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5478 days | 34% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5483 days | 33% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5490 days | 34% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5533 days | 31% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5542 days | 34% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5563 days | 33% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5563 days | 34% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5779 days | 33% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5784 days | 33% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5784 days | 34% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5784 days | 31% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5784 days | 31% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5787 days | 33% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5893 days | 33% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5894 days | 34% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5915 days | 34% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5915 days | 34% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 5982 days | 31% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.29% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.