Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.10%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2940 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2958 days | 97% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2970 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2979 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 3036 days | 90% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 3047 days | 84% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 3050 days | 89% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 3050 days | 90% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 3055 days | 90% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 3055 days | 90% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 3055 days | 89% |
Luke | 8/10 | 3060 days | 88% |
Kat | 9/10 | 3060 days | 89% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 3062 days | 89% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 3080 days | 87% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 3080 days | 87% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 3083 days | 87% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3296 days | 71% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3296 days | 71% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3302 days | 70% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3305 days | 71% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3305 days | 70% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3305 days | 69% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3307 days | 69% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3307 days | 70% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3315 days | 68% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3318 days | 68% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3318 days | 69% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3318 days | 69% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3318 days | 70% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3319 days | 64% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3320 days | 70% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3320 days | 68% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3321 days | 64% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3327 days | 63% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3327 days | 69% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3329 days | 69% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3332 days | 68% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3333 days | 68% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3339 days | 67% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3345 days | 68% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3349 days | 67% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3365 days | 66% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3397 days | 63% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3401 days | 62% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3403 days | 62% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3404 days | 62% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3408 days | 62% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3417 days | 62% |
Till | 10/10 | 3417 days | 62% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3417 days | 62% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3676 days | 40% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3679 days | 37% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3679 days | 37% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3679 days | 40% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3723 days | 36% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3728 days | 37% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3740 days | 36% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3762 days | 34% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 4021 days | 13% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 4021 days | 13% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 4025 days | 11% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 4025 days | 0% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 4046 days | 11% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 4046 days | 9% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 4055 days | 10% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 4055 days | 11% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 4060 days | 10% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 4060 days | 10% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 4065 days | 9% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 4065 days | 10% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 4069 days | 9% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 4069 days | 9% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 4070 days | 8% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 4070 days | 9% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 4071 days | 9% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 4073 days | 9% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 4073 days | 9% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4073 days | 9% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 4073 days | 7% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 4073 days | 7% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 4079 days | 8% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 4080 days | 8% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 4080 days | 8% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 4085 days | 5% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 4101 days | 5% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 4101 days | 6% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4103 days | 7% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 4103 days | 6% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4105 days | 7% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 4108 days | 6% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4113 days | 6% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4394 days | 25% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4406 days | 25% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4409 days | 25% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4409 days | 25% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4411 days | 25% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4412 days | 23% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4415 days | 25% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4415 days | 25% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4419 days | 25% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4423 days | 25% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4423 days | 25% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4424 days | 25% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4429 days | 25% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4438 days | 23% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4516 days | 25% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4518 days | 25% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4749 days | 25% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4751 days | 25% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4759 days | 25% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4793 days | 25% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4793 days | 25% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4794 days | 20% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4796 days | 25% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4797 days | 23% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4798 days | 25% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4799 days | 25% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4800 days | 25% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4801 days | 25% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4806 days | 25% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4814 days | 25% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4826 days | 25% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4826 days | 25% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4882 days | 25% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4886 days | 25% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 5095 days | 25% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5127 days | 25% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5128 days | 25% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5130 days | 25% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5133 days | 20% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5133 days | 25% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5135 days | 25% |
noname | 8/10 | 5135 days | 25% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5137 days | 25% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5140 days | 25% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5140 days | 23% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5141 days | 23% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5141 days | 25% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5141 days | 25% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5142 days | 25% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5143 days | 25% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5144 days | 25% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5145 days | 25% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5148 days | 25% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5150 days | 25% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5153 days | 25% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5153 days | 25% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5154 days | 25% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5155 days | 25% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5161 days | 25% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5165 days | 25% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5168 days | 25% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5168 days | 25% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5170 days | 20% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5171 days | 25% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5171 days | 23% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5177 days | 25% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5428 days | 25% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5428 days | 25% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5432 days | 25% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5448 days | 25% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5484 days | 25% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5489 days | 25% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5490 days | 25% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5493 days | 25% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5501 days | 25% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5501 days | 25% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5503 days | 25% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5516 days | 25% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5517 days | 25% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5518 days | 25% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5519 days | 25% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5521 days | 25% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5521 days | 20% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5522 days | 25% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5524 days | 25% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5525 days | 25% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5528 days | 25% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5537 days | 25% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5543 days | 25% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5543 days | 25% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5548 days | 25% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5555 days | 25% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5598 days | 23% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5607 days | 25% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5628 days | 25% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5628 days | 25% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5844 days | 25% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5849 days | 25% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5849 days | 25% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5849 days | 23% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5849 days | 23% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5852 days | 25% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5958 days | 25% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5959 days | 25% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5980 days | 25% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5980 days | 25% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 6047 days | 23% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.