Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2910 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2928 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2940 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2949 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 3006 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 3017 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 3020 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 3020 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 3025 days | 91% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 3025 days | 91% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 3025 days | 90% |
Luke | 8/10 | 3030 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 3030 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 3032 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 3050 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 3050 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 3053 days | 89% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3266 days | 75% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3266 days | 75% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3272 days | 75% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3275 days | 75% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3275 days | 74% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3275 days | 74% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3277 days | 74% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3277 days | 74% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3285 days | 73% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3288 days | 73% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3288 days | 74% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3288 days | 74% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3288 days | 74% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3289 days | 69% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3290 days | 74% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3290 days | 73% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3291 days | 69% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3297 days | 69% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3297 days | 74% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3299 days | 74% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3302 days | 73% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3303 days | 73% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3309 days | 72% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3315 days | 72% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3319 days | 72% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3335 days | 71% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3367 days | 69% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3371 days | 68% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3373 days | 68% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3374 days | 68% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3378 days | 67% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3387 days | 68% |
Till | 10/10 | 3387 days | 68% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3387 days | 68% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3646 days | 49% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3649 days | 46% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3649 days | 46% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3649 days | 49% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3693 days | 46% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3698 days | 46% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3710 days | 46% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3732 days | 44% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3991 days | 26% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3991 days | 26% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3995 days | 24% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3995 days | 14% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 4016 days | 24% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 4016 days | 23% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 4025 days | 24% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 4025 days | 24% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 4030 days | 24% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 4030 days | 24% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 4035 days | 23% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 4035 days | 23% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 4039 days | 23% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 4039 days | 23% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 4040 days | 21% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 4040 days | 23% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 4041 days | 23% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 4043 days | 22% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 4043 days | 22% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4043 days | 22% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 4043 days | 21% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 4043 days | 21% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 4049 days | 22% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 4050 days | 22% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 4050 days | 22% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 4055 days | 19% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 4071 days | 20% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 4071 days | 21% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4073 days | 21% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 4073 days | 21% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4075 days | 21% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 4078 days | 20% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4083 days | 20% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4364 days | 1% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4381 days | 35% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4382 days | 32% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4385 days | 35% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4385 days | 34% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4389 days | 34% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4393 days | 34% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4393 days | 35% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4394 days | 35% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4399 days | 35% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4408 days | 32% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4486 days | 35% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4488 days | 34% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4719 days | 34% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4721 days | 35% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4729 days | 35% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4763 days | 34% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4763 days | 35% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4764 days | 30% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4766 days | 34% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4767 days | 32% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4768 days | 34% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4769 days | 34% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4770 days | 35% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4771 days | 35% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4776 days | 34% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4784 days | 34% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4796 days | 34% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4796 days | 34% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4852 days | 34% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4856 days | 34% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 5065 days | 34% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5097 days | 34% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5098 days | 34% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5100 days | 35% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5103 days | 30% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5103 days | 35% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5105 days | 34% |
noname | 8/10 | 5105 days | 34% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5107 days | 34% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5110 days | 34% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5110 days | 32% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5111 days | 32% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5111 days | 35% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5111 days | 35% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5112 days | 34% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5113 days | 34% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5114 days | 34% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5115 days | 34% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5118 days | 34% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5120 days | 35% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5123 days | 34% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5123 days | 35% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5124 days | 34% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5125 days | 34% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5131 days | 34% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5135 days | 34% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5138 days | 34% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5138 days | 34% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5140 days | 30% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5141 days | 35% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5141 days | 32% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5147 days | 35% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5398 days | 34% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5398 days | 35% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5402 days | 35% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5418 days | 34% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5454 days | 34% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5459 days | 35% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5460 days | 35% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5463 days | 35% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5471 days | 35% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5471 days | 34% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5473 days | 34% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5486 days | 34% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5487 days | 34% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5488 days | 35% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5489 days | 34% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5491 days | 34% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5491 days | 30% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5492 days | 34% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5494 days | 34% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5495 days | 34% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5498 days | 34% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5507 days | 34% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5513 days | 34% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5513 days | 35% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5518 days | 34% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5525 days | 35% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5568 days | 32% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5577 days | 35% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5598 days | 34% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5598 days | 35% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5814 days | 34% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5819 days | 34% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5819 days | 35% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5819 days | 32% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5819 days | 32% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5822 days | 34% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5928 days | 34% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5929 days | 35% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5950 days | 35% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5950 days | 35% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 6017 days | 32% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.