G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2927 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2945 days | 97% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2957 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2966 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 3023 days | 90% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 3034 days | 84% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 3037 days | 89% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 3037 days | 90% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 3042 days | 90% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 3042 days | 90% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 3042 days | 89% |
Luke | 8/10 | 3047 days | 88% |
Kat | 9/10 | 3047 days | 89% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 3049 days | 89% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 3067 days | 87% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 3067 days | 87% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 3070 days | 88% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3283 days | 71% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3283 days | 71% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3289 days | 70% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3292 days | 71% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3292 days | 70% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3292 days | 69% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3294 days | 69% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3294 days | 70% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3302 days | 68% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3305 days | 68% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3305 days | 69% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3305 days | 69% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3305 days | 70% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3306 days | 64% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3307 days | 70% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3307 days | 68% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3308 days | 64% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3314 days | 63% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3314 days | 69% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3316 days | 69% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3319 days | 68% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3320 days | 68% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3326 days | 67% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3332 days | 68% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3336 days | 67% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3352 days | 66% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3384 days | 64% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3388 days | 62% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3390 days | 62% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3391 days | 62% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3395 days | 62% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3404 days | 62% |
Till | 10/10 | 3404 days | 62% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3404 days | 62% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3663 days | 41% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3666 days | 37% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3666 days | 37% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3666 days | 40% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3710 days | 36% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3715 days | 37% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3727 days | 36% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3749 days | 34% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 4008 days | 13% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 4008 days | 13% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 4012 days | 11% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 4012 days | 0% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 4033 days | 11% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 4033 days | 10% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 4042 days | 11% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 4042 days | 11% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 4047 days | 10% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 4047 days | 11% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 4052 days | 10% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 4052 days | 10% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 4056 days | 10% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 4056 days | 10% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 4057 days | 8% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 4057 days | 9% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 4058 days | 9% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 4060 days | 9% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 4060 days | 9% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 4060 days | 9% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 4060 days | 8% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 4060 days | 8% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 4066 days | 9% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 4067 days | 8% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 4067 days | 9% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 4072 days | 5% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 4088 days | 6% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 4088 days | 7% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 4090 days | 7% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 4090 days | 7% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4092 days | 7% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 4095 days | 7% |
Alex | 10/10 | 4100 days | 6% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4381 days | 24% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4393 days | 24% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4396 days | 25% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4396 days | 24% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4398 days | 25% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4399 days | 22% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4402 days | 25% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4402 days | 24% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4406 days | 24% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4410 days | 24% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4410 days | 25% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4411 days | 25% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4416 days | 25% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4425 days | 22% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4503 days | 25% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4505 days | 24% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4736 days | 24% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4738 days | 25% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4746 days | 25% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4780 days | 24% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4780 days | 25% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4781 days | 19% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4783 days | 24% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4784 days | 22% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4785 days | 24% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4786 days | 24% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4787 days | 25% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4788 days | 25% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4793 days | 24% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4801 days | 24% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4813 days | 24% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4813 days | 24% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4869 days | 24% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4873 days | 24% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 5082 days | 24% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 5114 days | 24% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 5115 days | 24% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5117 days | 25% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 5120 days | 19% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 5120 days | 25% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 5122 days | 24% |
noname | 8/10 | 5122 days | 24% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5124 days | 24% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5127 days | 24% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5127 days | 22% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5128 days | 22% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5128 days | 25% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5128 days | 25% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5129 days | 24% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5130 days | 24% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5131 days | 24% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5132 days | 24% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5135 days | 24% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5137 days | 25% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5140 days | 24% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5140 days | 25% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5141 days | 24% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5142 days | 24% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5148 days | 24% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5152 days | 24% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5155 days | 24% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5155 days | 24% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5157 days | 19% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5158 days | 25% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5158 days | 22% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5164 days | 25% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5415 days | 24% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5415 days | 25% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5419 days | 25% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5435 days | 24% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5471 days | 24% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5476 days | 25% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5477 days | 25% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5480 days | 25% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5488 days | 25% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5488 days | 24% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5490 days | 24% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5503 days | 24% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5504 days | 24% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5505 days | 25% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5506 days | 24% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5508 days | 24% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5508 days | 19% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5509 days | 24% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5511 days | 24% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5512 days | 24% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5515 days | 24% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5524 days | 24% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5530 days | 24% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5530 days | 25% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5535 days | 24% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5542 days | 25% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5585 days | 22% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5594 days | 25% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5615 days | 24% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5615 days | 25% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5831 days | 24% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5836 days | 24% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5836 days | 25% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5836 days | 22% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5836 days | 22% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5839 days | 24% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5945 days | 24% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5946 days | 25% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5967 days | 25% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5967 days | 25% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 6034 days | 22% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.