Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kepler Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
199 Valid Reviews
The Kepler Track experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 199 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 199 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 61 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track valid reviews is 87.44% and is based on 199 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
195 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 199 valid reviews, the experience has 195 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 57 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 63 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kepler Track face-to-face reviews is 87.18% and is based on 195 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mark Ashmore | 10/10 | 2804 days | 100% |
Tom | 9/10 | 2822 days | 98% |
Laureri Foster | 10/10 | 2834 days | 98% |
Tomas Kotul | 8/10 | 2843 days | 95% |
Dubrulle | 8/10 | 2900 days | 92% |
Sabrina Kulikar | 7/10 | 2911 days | 86% |
Lieke vol Velde | 8/10 | 2914 days | 91% |
Olde Vogel | 9/10 | 2914 days | 92% |
Elien Dauwe | 9/10 | 2919 days | 91% |
Simon Dauwe | 9/10 | 2919 days | 91% |
Mona Uttendorf | 8/10 | 2919 days | 90% |
Luke | 8/10 | 2924 days | 90% |
Kat | 9/10 | 2924 days | 91% |
Nanda Dyke | 9/10 | 2926 days | 91% |
Justine Langero | 8/10 | 2944 days | 89% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 2944 days | 89% |
Thomas Nolwenn | 9/10 | 2947 days | 90% |
Nele Foerske | 9/10 | 3160 days | 76% |
Leopold Kern | 9/10 | 3160 days | 76% |
Matej Trampzer | 9/10 | 3166 days | 75% |
Rebecca Grant | 10/10 | 3169 days | 76% |
Sarah Grant | 9/10 | 3169 days | 75% |
Holly Cooper | 8/10 | 3169 days | 74% |
Josh Legge | 8/10 | 3171 days | 74% |
Leonie Kaufmann | 9/10 | 3171 days | 75% |
Selina | 8/10 | 3179 days | 73% |
Radim Halasz | 8/10 | 3182 days | 73% |
Katerina Vobecka | 9/10 | 3182 days | 74% |
Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3182 days | 74% |
Jana Formankoua | 10/10 | 3182 days | 75% |
Rossella | 7/10 | 3183 days | 69% |
Johannes Eisel | 10/10 | 3184 days | 75% |
Alexander Mattea | 8/10 | 3184 days | 73% |
Anouk Jongsma | 7/10 | 3185 days | 69% |
Lukas Havlicek | 7/10 | 3191 days | 69% |
Art Ruisenor | 10/10 | 3191 days | 74% |
Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3193 days | 74% |
Munne | 9/10 | 3196 days | 73% |
Kim | 9/10 | 3197 days | 73% |
Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 3203 days | 73% |
Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 3209 days | 73% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3213 days | 73% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3229 days | 72% |
Anais Boileau | 10/10 | 3261 days | 70% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3265 days | 69% |
Kelsey Austin | 9/10 | 3267 days | 68% |
Thomas Stuber | 9/10 | 3268 days | 68% |
Ludo and Cha | 9/10 | 3272 days | 68% |
Falko | 10/10 | 3281 days | 68% |
Till | 10/10 | 3281 days | 68% |
Alan West | 10/10 | 3281 days | 68% |
Coralie Ambrosino | 9/10 | 3540 days | 50% |
Katharina Block | 7/10 | 3543 days | 47% |
Annika Fletemeyer | 7/10 | 3543 days | 47% |
Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3543 days | 50% |
Martin Kroek | 8/10 | 3587 days | 47% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3592 days | 48% |
Judi Gilchrist | 10/10 | 3604 days | 47% |
Samuel Tohko | 10/10 | 3626 days | 45% |
Nikolas Gut | 8/10 | 3885 days | 27% |
Anja Weppler | 9/10 | 3885 days | 28% |
Charlotte | 7/10 | 3889 days | 26% |
Vuillermet | 3/10 | 3889 days | 13% |
Annika Marz | 9/10 | 3910 days | 26% |
Julian Zeissler | 7/10 | 3910 days | 24% |
Daniel Robledo | 9/10 | 3919 days | 26% |
Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 3919 days | 26% |
Linus Larsson | 9/10 | 3924 days | 25% |
Radana Dlouha | 10/10 | 3924 days | 26% |
Maria = Moller Hansen | 8/10 | 3929 days | 25% |
Mike Gemmill | 10/10 | 3929 days | 25% |
Tiit Pullerits | 10/10 | 3933 days | 25% |
Marion Busch | 10/10 | 3933 days | 25% |
Natalie Boehm | 7/10 | 3934 days | 23% |
Steffen | 8/10 | 3934 days | 24% |
Thomas Zilio | 8/10 | 3935 days | 24% |
Tobias Gehring | 8/10 | 3937 days | 24% |
Felix Brettner | 8/10 | 3937 days | 24% |
Eugen Lehner | 8/10 | 3937 days | 24% |
Max Stein | 7/10 | 3937 days | 23% |
Simon Tanguy | 7/10 | 3937 days | 23% |
David Krasner | 9/10 | 3943 days | 24% |
G Ballard | 8/10 | 3944 days | 24% |
F Ballard | 9/10 | 3944 days | 24% |
Alexis Redor | 6/10 | 3949 days | 20% |
Ludvig Fagerstrom | 7/10 | 3965 days | 21% |
Johanna Bak | 8/10 | 3965 days | 22% |
Doran Swartz | 10/10 | 3967 days | 23% |
Guy David | 9/10 | 3967 days | 22% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 3969 days | 23% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3972 days | 22% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3977 days | 22% |
Omri Ifrsh | 9/10 | 4258 days | 3% |
Jiri van Straelper | 8/10 | 4270 days | 2% |
Lea Scheuvens | 10/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
Luise Fuchs | 8/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 10/10 | 4275 days | 2% |
Christian | 7/10 | 4276 days | 2% |
Joshua Perry | 10/10 | 4279 days | 2% |
Molly Ladd | 9/10 | 4279 days | 2% |
Sabisch Moritz | 8/10 | 4283 days | 1% |
Karina Gratz | 9/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4287 days | 1% |
Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4288 days | 1% |
Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 4293 days | 1% |
Veronica and Jordi | 7/10 | 4302 days | 0% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4380 days | 29% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4382 days | 29% |
Stuart Arrol | 8/10 | 4613 days | 28% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4615 days | 29% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4623 days | 29% |
Les Barnes | 8/10 | 4657 days | 28% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4657 days | 29% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4658 days | 24% |
Karin | 9/10 | 4660 days | 29% |
Ken | 7/10 | 4661 days | 27% |
Uwe Henze | 8/10 | 4662 days | 28% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4663 days | 29% |
Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 4664 days | 29% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 10/10 | 4665 days | 29% |
Nikita Sue | 9/10 | 4670 days | 29% |
Francis Corrigan | 8/10 | 4678 days | 28% |
Monika & Roger | 9/10 | 4690 days | 29% |
Jackie & Ray | 8/10 | 4690 days | 28% |
Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 4746 days | 29% |
Berry | 9/10 | 4750 days | 29% |
Jasmin Loeffler | 9/10 | 4959 days | 29% |
Faith Whitcraft | 8/10 | 4991 days | 28% |
R Tearle | 9/10 | 4992 days | 29% |
Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 4994 days | 29% |
Anezka Hlavacova | 6/10 | 4997 days | 24% |
Marii Joekalda | 10/10 | 4997 days | 29% |
Chrissy Crebas | 8/10 | 4999 days | 28% |
noname | 8/10 | 4999 days | 28% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5001 days | 29% |
Martin Vitiello | 9/10 | 5004 days | 29% |
Stefan Mudl | 7/10 | 5004 days | 27% |
Tara Koenig | 7/10 | 5005 days | 27% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5005 days | 29% |
Fabrizio Consolini | 10/10 | 5005 days | 29% |
Bruce & Elaine Chote | 9/10 | 5006 days | 29% |
Javier Munoz | 9/10 | 5007 days | 29% |
Lisa Lovebarge | 9/10 | 5008 days | 29% |
Susan Herd | 9/10 | 5009 days | 29% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5012 days | 29% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5014 days | 29% |
Grumbach | 9/10 | 5017 days | 29% |
Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5017 days | 29% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 9/10 | 5018 days | 29% |
Camilla Andersson | 8/10 | 5019 days | 28% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5025 days | 29% |
Martin Current | 8/10 | 5029 days | 28% |
James Jackson | 9/10 | 5032 days | 29% |
Cheryl | 8/10 | 5032 days | 28% |
Nataly Loewidt | 6/10 | 5034 days | 24% |
Martin L | 10/10 | 5035 days | 29% |
Ainoa Salazar Lozano | 7/10 | 5035 days | 27% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5041 days | 29% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5292 days | 29% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5292 days | 29% |
Dud Grossmann | 10/10 | 5296 days | 29% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5312 days | 28% |
philaus | 8/10 | 5348 days | 28% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5353 days | 29% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5354 days | 29% |
Margie | 10/10 | 5357 days | 29% |
Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5365 days | 29% |
Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5365 days | 29% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5367 days | 29% |
Dutertre Annaboue | 8/10 | 5380 days | 28% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 9/10 | 5381 days | 29% |
Colby Smythe | 10/10 | 5382 days | 29% |
Richard | 9/10 | 5383 days | 29% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5385 days | 29% |
John Cox | 6/10 | 5385 days | 24% |
Matthiis & Femke | 8/10 | 5386 days | 28% |
Sheila Morgan | 9/10 | 5388 days | 29% |
M Sicard | 9/10 | 5389 days | 29% |
Ilst De | 8/10 | 5392 days | 28% |
A Southwood | 8/10 | 5401 days | 28% |
Thomas Stopp | 8/10 | 5407 days | 28% |
BenH | 10/10 | 5407 days | 29% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5412 days | 28% |
Anne Heriot | 10/10 | 5419 days | 29% |
foucherm | 7/10 | 5462 days | 27% |
Stefan Lua | 10/10 | 5471 days | 29% |
anne p | 8/10 | 5492 days | 28% |
Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 5492 days | 29% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5708 days | 29% |
geoffelizabeth | 8/10 | 5713 days | 28% |
annysp | 10/10 | 5713 days | 29% |
JasminA | 7/10 | 5713 days | 27% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5713 days | 27% |
Jelle | 8/10 | 5716 days | 28% |
Dianne | 9/10 | 5822 days | 29% |
JulianeH | 10/10 | 5823 days | 29% |
Charlotta Halfwordson | 10/10 | 5844 days | 29% |
Josefine | 10/10 | 5844 days | 29% |
Sascha | 7/10 | 5911 days | 27% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kepler Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.