Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Nugget Point / Tokata.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Nugget Point / Tokata

Valid Reviews

116 Valid Reviews

The Nugget Point / Tokata experience has a total of 118 reviews. There are 116 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 116 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 55
47%
9/10 34
29%
8/10 21
18%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.81% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Nugget Point / Tokata valid reviews is 91.81% and is based on 116 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

102 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 116 valid reviews, the experience has 102 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 102 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 48
47%
9/10 29
28%
8/10 20
20%
7/10 4
4%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Nugget Point / Tokata face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 102 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.66%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sarah 10/10 822 days 100%
Rebecka 10/10 1826 days 8%
S Weslake 10/10 2497 days 6%
Sampo Uravirta 7/10 2580 days 5%
Samantha Brewin 8/10 2659 days 5%
C Clarke 10/10 2914 days 5%
Natasha 7/10 2966 days 4%
Oliver Francis 9/10 2966 days 4%
Lieke vol Velde 9/10 2985 days 4%
Bob 10/10 2987 days 4%
Luke 8/10 2997 days 4%
Hailey S 9/10 3007 days 4%
Diego Casanova 10/10 3023 days 4%
Claire 10/10 3029 days 4%
Anne 9/10 3030 days 4%
Anna Dalby 10/10 3030 days 4%
Beatrice and Cyrill 10/10 3187 days 4%
Monia Sassella 9/10 3225 days 4%
Claire 8/10 3228 days 4%
Benedikt Maus 8/10 3242 days 4%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3244 days 4%
Rodrigo 9/10 3246 days 4%
A Schultz 8/10 3247 days 3%
Cori Schultz 7/10 3248 days 3%
Dominique 9/10 3249 days 4%
Jeroen 8/10 3252 days 3%
Stephan Ophelders 9/10 3257 days 3%
Clayton Hunniford 6/10 3260 days 3%
Sandra 9/10 3268 days 3%
Lothen 10/10 3269 days 3%
Maike Santelmann 10/10 3276 days 3%
Niclas Ullno 7/10 3289 days 3%
Martina 10/10 3295 days 3%
Lisa 7/10 3297 days 3%
Matthias Hofer 10/10 3335 days 3%
Ronja and Lena 10/10 3341 days 3%
Pierre and Alexandra 10/10 3345 days 3%
Mathieu Brun 10/10 3353 days 3%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3393 days 3%
Dianne van der Wal 9/10 3488 days 3%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3650 days 2%
Fanny DeBon 10/10 3712 days 2%
Bartlomiej Berger 10/10 3719 days 2%
Julian 9/10 3973 days 1%
Reto 9/10 4003 days 1%
Mirjam Betschart 10/10 4003 days 1%
Tobias Gehring 10/10 4008 days 1%
Arthur Langlume 10/10 4012 days 1%
Bill 10/10 4015 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 9/10 4017 days 1%
Alacchi Moustier 10/10 4030 days 1%
Derek Knight 10/10 4031 days 1%
Maya Bakker-deDreu 9/10 4038 days 1%
John Davis 9/10 4047 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 8/10 4049 days 1%
Gal Bero 10/10 4051 days 1%
Evyatar Karni 10/10 4051 days 1%
Marie 10/10 4339 days 0%
AnnaM 9/10 4354 days 0%
Claire 9/10 4354 days 0%
Malgorzata 9/10 4358 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 8/10 4358 days 0%
Rogier Ramaker 8/10 4359 days 0%
Melvin Groenhof 8/10 4359 days 0%
Janine Kohlgrueler 10/10 4361 days 0%
Maxime 10/10 4366 days 0%
Jim Woodruff 9/10 4382 days 2%
Jeanne Moustier 10/10 4395 days 2%
Lis Bon 10/10 4413 days 2%
Karin Genyn 9/10 4430 days 2%
Alex Laidlaw 9/10 4451 days 2%
Meryem Buchwitz 9/10 4457 days 2%
Karin Laurev 8/10 4728 days 2%
Michael & Janet 8/10 4729 days 2%
Inge Davbbert 10/10 4731 days 2%
Sabine & Stefan 10/10 4732 days 2%
Manuela Weber 9/10 4733 days 2%
Nico Welagen 8/10 4734 days 2%
Lesley 10/10 4779 days 2%
Arnoldus Bergmans 9/10 4814 days 2%
Sally Reeves 10/10 5064 days 2%
John & Lorraine 8/10 5064 days 2%
Brock Wagner 9/10 5067 days 2%
Frank & Ruth 10/10 5069 days 2%
Juergen Wolf 10/10 5075 days 2%
Tim Laurent 9/10 5076 days 2%
henriket 10/10 5079 days 2%
Louise van der Hyden 10/10 5083 days 2%
Iko 8/10 5085 days 2%
Grumbach 10/10 5088 days 2%
Matthys Kikke 8/10 5089 days 2%
Hvid 10/10 5101 days 2%
Celia Murphy 10/10 5103 days 2%
Julia 10/10 5105 days 2%
Calvin Parsons 10/10 5113 days 2%
Montys 10/10 5236 days 2%
Kurt 9/10 5383 days 2%
Ian Tainsh 10/10 5432 days 2%
Benedict Fluthman 10/10 5440 days 2%
paddywhack 9/10 5450 days 2%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5463 days 2%
T. Timmers 9/10 5464 days 2%
Lasse Olesen 8/10 5471 days 2%
Annette Schmitt 10/10 5472 days 2%
Vincente Garrido 8/10 5473 days 2%
Joel K 9/10 5476 days 2%
Rachel & Barak 10/10 5476 days 2%
Sibille Fischer 10/10 5491 days 2%
Jonathan Angela 8/10 5492 days 2%
John J 8/10 5492 days 2%
Elizabeth E 8/10 5494 days 2%
tanh 9/10 5525 days 2%
alasiac 10/10 5540 days 2%
Silvia Huerlimann 9/10 5784 days 2%
Christian Moll 9/10 5800 days 2%
OdiliaF 10/10 5803 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Nugget Point / Tokata does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.57% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.