Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 229 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 624 days | 82% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1111 days | 36% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2237 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2482 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2633 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2936 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3150 days | 3% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3281 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3559 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3559 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3566 days | 2% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3587 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3697 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3807 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4001 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4368 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4642 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4680 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5756 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5790 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5791 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5791 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5797 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5803 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5806 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5817 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5817 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5871 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5886 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 5985 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6091 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6091 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6110 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6115 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6115 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6119 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6123 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.