Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tongariro Northern Circuit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
75 Valid Reviews
The Tongariro Northern Circuit experience has a total of 75 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 41 |
|
55% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.47% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit valid reviews is 91.47% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
70 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 70 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.86% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit face-to-face reviews is 90.86% and is based on 70 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
96.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris | 10/10 | 433 days | 100% |
| Eva Cordemeyer | 9/10 | 2956 days | 3% |
| Matti Picus | 10/10 | 3218 days | 3% |
| Vic Baughen | 9/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 10/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 10/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| Kallan Mrozek | 9/10 | 3290 days | 2% |
| Frank Fabian | 8/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
| Sabine Schwandegger | 10/10 | 3307 days | 2% |
| Carmen Stanow | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3537 days | 2% |
| Estelle Coquard | 10/10 | 3540 days | 2% |
| Juliane Mueller | 10/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 3554 days | 2% |
| Bjoern | 10/10 | 3554 days | 2% |
| Floren Hoenschler | 9/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
| Simone De Angiou | 10/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| William Lendway | 10/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Morgan Fog | 10/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Lorne Paterson | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 10/10 | 3601 days | 2% |
| Kyle Johnson | 9/10 | 3601 days | 2% |
| Tamara | 8/10 | 3601 days | 2% |
| Markus Wabing | 9/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Uschi Pongratz | 10/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Jessica Ruhland | 10/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Edwine | 6/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Sara Kuenzi | 9/10 | 3618 days | 2% |
| Maxime Louis | 10/10 | 3619 days | 2% |
| Lukas Schenke | 10/10 | 3648 days | 2% |
| Till | 10/10 | 3663 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Justin | 8/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 3974 days | 1% |
| Friederike Kranzin | 10/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Marc Engstle | 7/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 9/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Max Grabowski | 10/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Victor Herranz | 10/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Nimh Oudhof | 8/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Harel Cliad | 9/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Aitnan Melman | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Alex Artigues | 7/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Simon Zenzen | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
| Marketa | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Lusi13 | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Jean Raisin | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Tony and Helene | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Missy and Chaz | 10/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Evyatar Tulipman | 7/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 4745 days | 1% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 5017 days | 1% |
| Be Groen | 7/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
| Ian Sainsbury | 7/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| Anika | 9/10 | 5058 days | 1% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| snoopidoops | 10/10 | 5090 days | 1% |
| Natascha & Greg | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
| Robin van der Linden | 9/10 | 5347 days | 1% |
| Zoe Barker | 10/10 | 5370 days | 1% |
| R Tearle | 4/10 | 5374 days | 1% |
| Susannah Eduart | 8/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Nadia Husain | 8/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| anon | 10/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
| Marcel Baessle | 10/10 | 5775 days | 1% |
| Karen Raven | 7/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| bdevries | 8/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 6205 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tongariro Northern Circuit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.