G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2748 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 2942 days | 87% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3210 days | 70% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3240 days | 65% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3247 days | 64% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3252 days | 68% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3253 days | 64% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3276 days | 67% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3278 days | 66% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3284 days | 67% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3284 days | 66% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3286 days | 67% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3292 days | 65% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3295 days | 66% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3300 days | 65% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3303 days | 65% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3306 days | 61% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3306 days | 64% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3307 days | 65% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3309 days | 65% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3309 days | 61% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3309 days | 65% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3327 days | 64% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3328 days | 64% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3342 days | 63% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3352 days | 62% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3392 days | 60% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3519 days | 51% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3538 days | 51% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3538 days | 51% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3540 days | 51% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3541 days | 50% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3543 days | 51% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3543 days | 51% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3545 days | 47% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3550 days | 47% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3554 days | 49% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3557 days | 50% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3558 days | 50% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3558 days | 50% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3558 days | 49% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3560 days | 46% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3562 days | 50% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3568 days | 48% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3569 days | 49% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3569 days | 49% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3570 days | 48% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3570 days | 48% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3570 days | 49% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3571 days | 49% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3573 days | 49% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3574 days | 48% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3576 days | 49% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3576 days | 45% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3578 days | 48% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3584 days | 45% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3584 days | 45% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3586 days | 48% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3588 days | 48% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3589 days | 47% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3590 days | 47% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3590 days | 36% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3591 days | 48% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3596 days | 47% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3599 days | 46% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3599 days | 46% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3600 days | 41% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3601 days | 21% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3601 days | 47% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3602 days | 44% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3602 days | 47% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3602 days | 47% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3602 days | 47% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3603 days | 47% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3603 days | 47% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3608 days | 47% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3608 days | 46% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3609 days | 46% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3611 days | 46% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3611 days | 46% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3611 days | 43% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3612 days | 46% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3615 days | 46% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3616 days | 45% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3621 days | 43% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3621 days | 46% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3622 days | 45% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3623 days | 46% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3624 days | 45% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3626 days | 46% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3626 days | 45% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3645 days | 44% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3648 days | 43% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3653 days | 43% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3654 days | 43% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3656 days | 43% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3661 days | 43% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3672 days | 42% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3690 days | 42% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 3790 days | 35% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3923 days | 27% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3923 days | 27% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 3923 days | 27% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 3924 days | 27% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 3924 days | 25% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 3925 days | 27% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 3926 days | 27% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 3927 days | 25% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 3964 days | 24% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 3986 days | 23% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4017 days | 21% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4026 days | 21% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4263 days | 6% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4279 days | 5% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4279 days | 5% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4280 days | 5% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4280 days | 5% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4283 days | 5% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4283 days | 5% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4298 days | 4% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4298 days | 2% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4299 days | 4% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4302 days | 3% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4304 days | 4% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4305 days | 4% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4307 days | 3% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4307 days | 3% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4308 days | 3% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4308 days | 3% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4312 days | 3% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4312 days | 3% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4312 days | 3% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4319 days | 3% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4348 days | 1% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4355 days | 1% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4452 days | 31% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4635 days | 28% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4640 days | 30% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4653 days | 30% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4664 days | 30% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4666 days | 28% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4666 days | 30% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4671 days | 30% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4676 days | 28% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4738 days | 31% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4738 days | 31% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4742 days | 30% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4743 days | 30% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4744 days | 30% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4748 days | 30% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4755 days | 31% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4756 days | 28% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4756 days | 30% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4760 days | 30% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4761 days | 28% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4761 days | 28% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4761 days | 30% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4761 days | 31% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4761 days | 31% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4762 days | 31% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4764 days | 30% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4765 days | 30% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4765 days | 31% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4765 days | 30% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4766 days | 30% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4766 days | 30% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4768 days | 30% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4768 days | 30% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5019 days | 30% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5025 days | 30% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5026 days | 30% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5027 days | 30% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5028 days | 28% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5031 days | 28% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5035 days | 31% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5038 days | 30% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5038 days | 30% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5043 days | 30% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5045 days | 31% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5045 days | 30% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5045 days | 31% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5045 days | 28% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5047 days | 30% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5047 days | 30% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5047 days | 30% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5048 days | 31% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5055 days | 30% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5060 days | 30% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5073 days | 30% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5086 days | 30% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5126 days | 30% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5128 days | 30% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5129 days | 30% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5131 days | 30% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5137 days | 31% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5137 days | 28% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5138 days | 30% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5138 days | 31% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5138 days | 30% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5139 days | 30% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5152 days | 30% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5152 days | 30% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5152 days | 30% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5366 days | 28% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5367 days | 30% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5380 days | 30% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5380 days | 30% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5394 days | 31% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5396 days | 31% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5398 days | 31% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5400 days | 31% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5409 days | 26% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5411 days | 31% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5415 days | 31% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5415 days | 31% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5416 days | 30% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5416 days | 31% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5418 days | 31% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5418 days | 31% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5422 days | 30% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5425 days | 30% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5426 days | 30% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5609 days | 30% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5696 days | 30% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5701 days | 30% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5753 days | 30% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5753 days | 30% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5764 days | 31% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5768 days | 31% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5768 days | 30% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5768 days | 30% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5769 days | 31% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5769 days | 30% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5771 days | 31% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5772 days | 31% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5776 days | 30% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5784 days | 30% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5785 days | 31% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5785 days | 30% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5785 days | 31% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5786 days | 31% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5786 days | 30% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 5787 days | 12% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 5796 days | 28% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 5804 days | 30% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5835 days | 31% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 5835 days | 31% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 5837 days | 30% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 5838 days | 31% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 5841 days | 30% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 5841 days | 30% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5844 days | 30% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 5850 days | 31% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 5854 days | 31% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 5856 days | 31% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 5856 days | 31% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5860 days | 30% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 5860 days | 30% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 5860 days | 30% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 5862 days | 30% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 5862 days | 30% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 5862 days | 26% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 5863 days | 30% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 5864 days | 30% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 5864 days | 31% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5864 days | 30% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 5864 days | 30% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 5878 days | 30% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6084 days | 31% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6092 days | 31% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6093 days | 30% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6096 days | 31% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6096 days | 30% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6098 days | 30% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6112 days | 30% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6112 days | 31% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6112 days | 31% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6114 days | 31% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6115 days | 30% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6115 days | 31% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6116 days | 30% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6477 days | 31% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6477 days | 30% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.