Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite

Valid Reviews

103 Valid Reviews

The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 106 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 45
44%
9/10 36
35%
8/10 13
13%
7/10 5
5%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 2
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.78% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 90.78% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

23 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 6
26%
9/10 9
39%
8/10 7
30%
7/10 1
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.70% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

88.07%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sophie 9/10 30 days 99%
Laura 7/10 30 days 93%
Magda Musa 10/10 30 days 100%
McLean 9/10 30 days 99%
Emily 9/10 61 days 99%
Jakub 5/10 122 days 76%
Khalid 9/10 336 days 93%
Jesse Leake 10/10 336 days 94%
Janet and Kevin 10/10 365 days 92%
Andi 9/10 365 days 92%
Daggi 9/10 457 days 87%
Niff 6/10 671 days 64%
Manuel Mayer 10/10 730 days 70%
J King 6/10 761 days 58%
Marion 9/10 761 days 66%
Nyree 10/10 761 days 67%
Mckenzie Galbraith 8/10 792 days 63%
Julia 10/10 792 days 64%
Yuri Fey 10/10 853 days 59%
RaghaV 8/10 1126 days 32%
EvaBelle 7/10 1157 days 28%
Siobhan 10/10 1460 days 13%
Maree 10/10 1460 days 13%
The Gillies 10/10 1460 days 13%
Ange 10/10 1491 days 11%
Ambili 9/10 1491 days 11%
Paula 8/10 1552 days 9%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 1644 days 7%
Anneke 9/10 1797 days 5%
Jean-Michel and Bambi 10/10 1797 days 5%
Thangs 10/10 1797 days 5%
Leona 9/10 1857 days 5%
GM 9/10 1888 days 5%
Fred 10/10 1918 days 5%
Suthep 10/10 2132 days 4%
Cathy Casanova 10/10 2163 days 4%
Jonathan 10/10 2191 days 4%
Anne 9/10 2191 days 4%
Sam 7/10 2222 days 4%
Lauren 9/10 2222 days 4%
Paula G 9/10 2253 days 4%
Thijs 10/10 2253 days 4%
Raphaele 10/10 2253 days 4%
Maka 10/10 2253 days 4%
Connor 10/10 2253 days 4%
Rachael Dyson 9/10 2282 days 4%
Demi Thompson 8/10 2283 days 4%
Cindy 9/10 2283 days 4%
Eva 10/10 2344 days 4%
James 10/10 2497 days 4%
Arne 9/10 2497 days 4%
Mallory 10/10 2528 days 4%
Tristan & Jolie 10/10 2528 days 4%
Sophie Avison 9/10 2543 days 4%
Clare Davies 10/10 2586 days 3%
Derek Gillard 9/10 2586 days 3%
Geart-Jan Benedictus 8/10 2606 days 3%
Lucile Gendre 9/10 2847 days 3%
Lucy Oury 9/10 2849 days 3%
Nick Lawson 9/10 2852 days 3%
Brandon 10/10 2882 days 3%
Paul Williams 10/10 2915 days 3%
Linda Livett 5/10 2920 days 2%
Craig Eagleton 10/10 2926 days 3%
Trent O'Keeffe 10/10 2942 days 3%
Joe Hopkins 10/10 2950 days 3%
Ruiyi Yin 10/10 2989 days 3%
Jude Ong 10/10 3012 days 3%
Arthur 9/10 3204 days 2%
Lena Wesselink 9/10 3261 days 2%
Tony Maroulis 10/10 3268 days 2%
Felicity Fay 9/10 3286 days 2%
Lisa Conradie 8/10 3287 days 2%
Jonas Jutzi 10/10 3398 days 2%
Petra Geblova 10/10 3671 days 1%
Janie Allen 10/10 3676 days 1%
Henrik Bours 8/10 3973 days 1%
Svenja Trubenbach 9/10 3973 days 1%
Kathrin Deichmann 10/10 3994 days 1%
Janis Gallois 10/10 4012 days 1%
Kiernan Matthew 9/10 4016 days 1%
Zoe Ross 9/10 4017 days 1%
Andrew Young 10/10 4017 days 1%
Danyelle Miller 9/10 4040 days 1%
Thomas Roche 10/10 4050 days 0%
Mycall 10/10 4323 days 0%
ramy 9/10 4323 days 0%
Annika Schmidt 7/10 4328 days 0%
Michael Heuer 9/10 4331 days 0%
Steve Maona 9/10 4347 days 0%
Billy Koichopolos 8/10 4347 days 0%
Gina Lisi 8/10 4347 days 0%
Petra Blumberg 8/10 4360 days 0%
Clare Cannon 9/10 4364 days 0%
Jan Zimmerman 8/10 4369 days 0%
Kerri 7/10 4413 days 1%
Val Phillips 8/10 4712 days 1%
Hazel & Alan Damerell 10/10 4730 days 1%
Kasten 10/10 5087 days 1%
Kasia Robshaw 9/10 5089 days 1%
Andy 8/10 5100 days 1%
Dr Dorthe Bossow 10/10 5109 days 1%
Ruud Kapteyn 9/10 5484 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.28% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.