G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 107 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 46 |
|
44% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
35% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 90.87% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
23 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 104 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 9 |
|
39% |
8/10 | 7 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.67%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Traveller 656 | 10/10 | 43 days | 100% |
Sophie | 9/10 | 74 days | 99% |
Laura | 7/10 | 74 days | 93% |
Magda Musa | 10/10 | 74 days | 100% |
McLean | 9/10 | 74 days | 99% |
Emily | 9/10 | 105 days | 98% |
Jakub | 5/10 | 166 days | 75% |
Khalid | 9/10 | 380 days | 91% |
Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 380 days | 92% |
Janet and Kevin | 10/10 | 409 days | 91% |
Andi | 9/10 | 409 days | 90% |
Daggi | 9/10 | 501 days | 85% |
Niff | 6/10 | 715 days | 61% |
Manuel Mayer | 10/10 | 774 days | 66% |
J King | 6/10 | 805 days | 54% |
Marion | 9/10 | 805 days | 62% |
Nyree | 10/10 | 805 days | 63% |
Mckenzie Galbraith | 8/10 | 836 days | 59% |
Julia | 10/10 | 836 days | 60% |
Yuri Fey | 10/10 | 897 days | 54% |
RaghaV | 8/10 | 1170 days | 29% |
EvaBelle | 7/10 | 1201 days | 25% |
Siobhan | 10/10 | 1504 days | 11% |
Maree | 10/10 | 1504 days | 11% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1504 days | 11% |
Ange | 10/10 | 1535 days | 10% |
Ambili | 9/10 | 1535 days | 10% |
Paula | 8/10 | 1596 days | 8% |
Boardwalk Blss | 9/10 | 1688 days | 6% |
Anneke | 9/10 | 1841 days | 5% |
Jean-Michel and Bambi | 10/10 | 1841 days | 5% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1841 days | 5% |
Leona | 9/10 | 1901 days | 5% |
GM | 9/10 | 1932 days | 5% |
Fred | 10/10 | 1962 days | 5% |
Suthep | 10/10 | 2176 days | 4% |
Cathy Casanova | 10/10 | 2207 days | 4% |
Jonathan | 10/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
Anne | 9/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
Sam | 7/10 | 2266 days | 4% |
Lauren | 9/10 | 2266 days | 4% |
Paula G | 9/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Thijs | 10/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Raphaele | 10/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Maka | 10/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Connor | 10/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2326 days | 4% |
Demi Thompson | 8/10 | 2327 days | 4% |
Cindy | 9/10 | 2327 days | 4% |
Eva | 10/10 | 2388 days | 4% |
James | 10/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Arne | 9/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2572 days | 4% |
Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 2572 days | 4% |
Sophie Avison | 9/10 | 2587 days | 3% |
Clare Davies | 10/10 | 2630 days | 3% |
Derek Gillard | 9/10 | 2630 days | 3% |
Geart-Jan Benedictus | 8/10 | 2650 days | 3% |
Lucile Gendre | 9/10 | 2891 days | 3% |
Lucy Oury | 9/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
Nick Lawson | 9/10 | 2896 days | 3% |
Brandon | 10/10 | 2926 days | 3% |
Paul Williams | 10/10 | 2959 days | 3% |
Linda Livett | 5/10 | 2964 days | 2% |
Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 2970 days | 3% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 2986 days | 3% |
Joe Hopkins | 10/10 | 2994 days | 3% |
Ruiyi Yin | 10/10 | 3033 days | 3% |
Jude Ong | 10/10 | 3056 days | 3% |
Arthur | 9/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
Lena Wesselink | 9/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
Felicity Fay | 9/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
Lisa Conradie | 8/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
Jonas Jutzi | 10/10 | 3442 days | 2% |
Petra Geblova | 10/10 | 3715 days | 1% |
Janie Allen | 10/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
Henrik Bours | 8/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
Svenja Trubenbach | 9/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4060 days | 0% |
Zoe Ross | 9/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
Danyelle Miller | 9/10 | 4084 days | 0% |
Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4094 days | 0% |
Mycall | 10/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
ramy | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Annika Schmidt | 7/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
Michael Heuer | 9/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
Steve Maona | 9/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
Billy Koichopolos | 8/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
Gina Lisi | 8/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
Petra Blumberg | 8/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
Clare Cannon | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
Jan Zimmerman | 8/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
Kerri | 7/10 | 4457 days | 1% |
Val Phillips | 8/10 | 4756 days | 1% |
Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
Kasten | 10/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
Kasia Robshaw | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Andy | 8/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
Dr Dorthe Bossow | 10/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 9/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.19% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.