Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has a total of 81 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
14% |
9/10 | 19 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 20 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
72.63% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park valid reviews is 72.63% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 5 |
|
28% |
9/10 | 3 |
|
17% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.22% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
76.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Larissa | 9/10 | 387 days | 100% |
Laura | 8/10 | 660 days | 81% |
Lucy | 1/10 | 844 days | 27% |
Anne S | 8/10 | 997 days | 48% |
Suzanne | 9/10 | 1301 days | 23% |
HSnow | 8/10 | 1543 days | 10% |
Kelly | 9/10 | 1635 days | 8% |
Melanie | 5/10 | 1787 days | 4% |
Neroli | 9/10 | 1818 days | 5% |
William | 9/10 | 1848 days | 5% |
Sarah | 9/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Catharina | 1/10 | 2121 days | 2% |
Fabian | 5/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
Steve | 2/10 | 2152 days | 2% |
Francois & Caroline | 7/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
Arne | 5/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
chris marshall | 5/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
Kelsie | 5/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
Nifty | 8/10 | 2213 days | 5% |
Yar Ni Ng | 6/10 | 2274 days | 4% |
Antony Lewis | 9/10 | 2427 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 6/10 | 2458 days | 4% |
Simon Zimmermann | 2/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
Eversons | 6/10 | 2486 days | 3% |
Fedor Bezrukov | 2/10 | 2510 days | 2% |
Wen Xin Tan | 9/10 | 2659 days | 4% |
Gerry Boobis | 8/10 | 2761 days | 3% |
Louise Russell | 9/10 | 2791 days | 3% |
Vicky Moore | 2/10 | 2803 days | 1% |
Roberto | 6/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
Sophie Ross | 8/10 | 2831 days | 3% |
Andy Payne | 8/10 | 2926 days | 3% |
Joost de Hond | 2/10 | 2930 days | 1% |
Tom Relou | 3/10 | 2966 days | 2% |
Maggy Kinniburgh | 3/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
Michelle Klein | 10/10 | 3003 days | 3% |
Wayne Jeskie | 10/10 | 3144 days | 3% |
David Elliott | 8/10 | 3156 days | 3% |
Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
R Werder | 8/10 | 3232 days | 2% |
Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
Penny King | 9/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
Lesa Price | 9/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
Viki Ziemba | 9/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
AusCampa | 9/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
Chris Read | 8/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
Rossco | 10/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
Nyla and Alan Ramsay | 9/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
Jan Collins | 10/10 | 3572 days | 2% |
Ron Clarke | 7/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Hol. M. | 7/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
bzh974 | 6/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Andy Jobst | 10/10 | 3644 days | 1% |
Joanne Robertson | 8/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
travelscot | 9/10 | 3858 days | 1% |
Anthony Brown | 5/10 | 3971 days | 0% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
Jonathan Meun | 7/10 | 4314 days | 0% |
William Notcutt | 5/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Lindsay Berquist | 7/10 | 4588 days | 1% |
Signe Kaspersen | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Steve Goodyear | 10/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
Andreas Kristiansen | 8/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
prasub | 4/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
qofd | 7/10 | 4954 days | 1% |
Jon_and_Family | 9/10 | 4984 days | 1% |
Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 4984 days | 1% |
Tina Madsen | 4/10 | 5001 days | 0% |
Lenny Appel | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Tyson Burnett | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Hadleigh | 7/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5313 days | 1% |
Chris Bil | 9/10 | 5375 days | 1% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
Bert Tonwen | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
Ian E | 9/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
5.82% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.