Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
129 Valid Reviews
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 133 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 13 |
|
10% |
9/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
8/10 | 46 |
|
36% |
7/10 | 20 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 12 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
73.80% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.80% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
74.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lu | 8/10 | 266 days | 99% |
Janneke | 9/10 | 266 days | 100% |
Diana Heffner | 1/10 | 387 days | 39% |
Nicky | 7/10 | 418 days | 88% |
Shykiwi | 7/10 | 571 days | 80% |
Amy Fortin-Barrette | 9/10 | 571 days | 85% |
Lukas Meier | 2/10 | 632 days | 37% |
Laz. | 8/10 | 632 days | 80% |
Paul McLaughlin | 8/10 | 660 days | 78% |
RR | 6/10 | 722 days | 64% |
Colin | 9/10 | 783 days | 68% |
Carol | 9/10 | 936 days | 52% |
Rosie | 7/10 | 1178 days | 28% |
Ogilvie family of 5 | 8/10 | 1421 days | 15% |
Monkeyalan | 7/10 | 1543 days | 9% |
Carla | 8/10 | 1756 days | 5% |
Tanja & Sven | 6/10 | 1787 days | 5% |
Nigel Crane | 10/10 | 1818 days | 5% |
Corin Krainer | 5/10 | 1818 days | 4% |
Fran | 6/10 | 1818 days | 5% |
Stevie | 5/10 | 2062 days | 4% |
Cassie | 9/10 | 2274 days | 4% |
Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
Sue | 6/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
sally m | 10/10 | 2366 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 8/10 | 2458 days | 4% |
Benn | 8/10 | 2458 days | 4% |
Angela MacPherson | 8/10 | 2477 days | 4% |
Shira LA | 8/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 3/10 | 2486 days | 2% |
Jack James | 8/10 | 2544 days | 4% |
Rodney Morris | 7/10 | 2578 days | 3% |
Laeticia Coelho | 10/10 | 2584 days | 4% |
Samantha Brewin | 7/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
Suzanne Halfpenny | 6/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
Charlie Dodds | 8/10 | 2633 days | 4% |
Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
Per Rantze | 1/10 | 2730 days | 1% |
Chris Nugent | 10/10 | 2753 days | 3% |
Josh Withell | 4/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
Iris Maatman | 10/10 | 2813 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
Josephine Ayvadian | 10/10 | 2823 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 7/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
Lenka Pruherova | 8/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 2907 days | 3% |
estelle D | 6/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
Sheryl Hicks | 8/10 | 2955 days | 3% |
Helen Keck | 10/10 | 3040 days | 3% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3059 days | 3% |
Sarah Hammond | 9/10 | 3077 days | 3% |
Tony | 8/10 | 3157 days | 2% |
Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3174 days | 2% |
Roland Tauchner | 3/10 | 3193 days | 1% |
Peter Fink | 9/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 7/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 7/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
Pang Albert | 7/10 | 3374 days | 2% |
Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3411 days | 2% |
Nicole | 9/10 | 3469 days | 2% |
Barry Goodwin | 5/10 | 3550 days | 1% |
Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
John Drake | 6/10 | 3559 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 5/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
Lucy Grund | 9/10 | 3645 days | 1% |
Gianpiero Rodari | 8/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 8/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3827 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
Marek Heiurich | 3/10 | 3897 days | 0% |
Stefan Glock | 9/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 8/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 8/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 7/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
Carina Borho | 8/10 | 3953 days | 1% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 3954 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 8/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
Andy Karl | 8/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 5/10 | 3985 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 6/10 | 4039 days | 1% |
Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4070 days | 1% |
Kerri | 8/10 | 4100 days | 1% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4253 days | 0% |
Verena | 9/10 | 4275 days | 0% |
Anja S | 9/10 | 4275 days | 0% |
Moni Sangoi | 6/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Martin | 8/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Martyn Kool | 4/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
Marieke | 4/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 8/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Katharina Pape | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
Kimothy | 8/10 | 4618 days | 1% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4646 days | 1% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
Heather & Jenny | 7/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4831 days | 1% |
damaca | 1/10 | 4831 days | 0% |
redmatthew16 | 9/10 | 4923 days | 1% |
Ed Piotrowski | 8/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 8/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
G Cucel | 10/10 | 4998 days | 1% |
Siggi Wick | 6/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 8/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 7/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
LandJ | 3/10 | 5015 days | 1% |
Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 5017 days | 1% |
Mr & Mrs Mackie | 5/10 | 5025 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 8/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 3/10 | 5038 days | 0% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
Paula Martinez | 8/10 | 5383 days | 1% |
Dieter Groscurth | 7/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 8/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
asselman | 8/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5500 days | 1% |
Ritag | 9/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 7/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5757 days | 1% |
John | 6/10 | 5763 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.99% |
198 | -4.01% |
199 | -4.03% |
200 | -4.05% |
201 | -4.07% |
202 | -4.09% |
203 | -4.11% |
… | … |
6.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.