Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for South Brighton Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
74 Valid Reviews
The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has a total of 80 reviews. There are 74 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 14 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 20 |
|
27% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
77.97% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the South Brighton Holiday Park valid reviews is 77.97% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
9/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
8/10 | 3 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the South Brighton Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Fabian | 8/10 | 61 days | 100% |
Kay | 8/10 | 305 days | 95% |
Klaudia Fekete | 9/10 | 336 days | 95% |
Pauline | 8/10 | 365 days | 93% |
Lu | 1/10 | 396 days | 38% |
Annessa Eason | 10/10 | 427 days | 92% |
June Cormack | 9/10 | 488 days | 87% |
Lizelle Bennett | 9/10 | 518 days | 86% |
Marie Perret | 9/10 | 518 days | 86% |
Amy Catley | 10/10 | 641 days | 78% |
Lynsey Keaton | 8/10 | 702 days | 72% |
Suzanne p | 10/10 | 702 days | 73% |
Danny Mac | 6/10 | 730 days | 61% |
Trui Waalwijk | 3/10 | 761 days | 37% |
Kellie | 10/10 | 761 days | 68% |
Alex | 9/10 | 761 days | 68% |
Julia | 8/10 | 792 days | 64% |
Peter | 1/10 | 822 days | 25% |
Rambo23 | 9/10 | 822 days | 62% |
Alex Tikonoff | 4/10 | 822 days | 41% |
Ramona | 9/10 | 1460 days | 13% |
Ada | 8/10 | 1491 days | 11% |
Morgan | 8/10 | 1583 days | 8% |
Keith & Kay Finlayson | 6/10 | 2010 days | 4% |
Janna Schneppenheim | 10/10 | 2163 days | 4% |
Bob C | 9/10 | 2191 days | 4% |
Marilli | 10/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
Hanna | 9/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
Andrew | 3/10 | 2283 days | 2% |
Nifty | 8/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
Joe | 8/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
Cassie | 7/10 | 2344 days | 4% |
Boa | 9/10 | 2375 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 8/10 | 2467 days | 4% |
Paul and Paula | 8/10 | 2608 days | 3% |
Sanne Heil | 8/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
Nora Tobies | 7/10 | 2623 days | 3% |
Michael Talbot | 5/10 | 2653 days | 3% |
Silvia Rissi | 10/10 | 2660 days | 3% |
Howard Morris | 6/10 | 2681 days | 3% |
Vanessa Stubbs | 6/10 | 2705 days | 3% |
Tracey Tyson | 10/10 | 2827 days | 3% |
Kate and Dom | 8/10 | 2902 days | 2% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 7/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
S Webb | 10/10 | 2985 days | 3% |
Peter Passlack | 9/10 | 3021 days | 3% |
Julia Mayerhoefer | 8/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
Lisa Conradie | 7/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
leo lionheart | 10/10 | 3563 days | 2% |
Rossco | 3/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
Jean-Claude Escutary | 9/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
Mark Angell | 8/10 | 3697 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 9/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
Kane F | 10/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
Jeanne Knights | 9/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
Andy Karl | 9/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
catherine welsh | 7/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
Helen Buxton | 9/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
Alan Blackburn | 6/10 | 4079 days | 0% |
Kiwix3 | 9/10 | 4170 days | 0% |
Mycall | 9/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
Trissy MP | 5/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
CanadaGirl23 | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
Andrew K | 8/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
Lyn Deavin | 7/10 | 4731 days | 1% |
Seraphim Karin | 10/10 | 4745 days | 1% |
damaca | 8/10 | 4901 days | 1% |
Sofie Dubillot | 10/10 | 5088 days | 1% |
Marcus Kippner | 5/10 | 5441 days | 0% |
Emily Walters | 7/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
Laura Walters | 8/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
andriesk | 6/10 | 5666 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.72% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the South Brighton Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 35 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
32 | -0.66% |
33 | -0.68% |
34 | -0.70% |
35 | -0.72% |
36 | -0.75% |
37 | -0.77% |
38 | -0.79% |
… | … |
2.83% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.