Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
96 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 16 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 11 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
73.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.13% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
40% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
13% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 79.78% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
69.56%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diana | 7/10 | 52 days | 95% |
| Yvonne | 9/10 | 113 days | 100% |
| Vicky Dmc | 1/10 | 174 days | 41% |
| Virginie | 1/10 | 295 days | 39% |
| Carsten | 6/10 | 326 days | 82% |
| tortuga | 7/10 | 357 days | 88% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 448 days | 89% |
| Kawena Schuman | 7/10 | 540 days | 79% |
| Jo McAlpine | 8/10 | 540 days | 83% |
| Matt Olejniczak | 7/10 | 632 days | 73% |
| Inge | 7/10 | 691 days | 69% |
| Jo | 6/10 | 1452 days | 11% |
| Lorelle | 10/10 | 1635 days | 7% |
| Reba | 8/10 | 1756 days | 5% |
| Jenny | 7/10 | 1787 days | 5% |
| Bites | 7/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
| Julianne McKie | 8/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
| frans van schie | 7/10 | 1940 days | 4% |
| Chelle | 5/10 | 2121 days | 3% |
| Jeanne | 7/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
| Boguslaw MAKIELLO | 6/10 | 2441 days | 3% |
| The Weathersons | 6/10 | 2471 days | 3% |
| Ronald Daigneault | 6/10 | 2541 days | 3% |
| Lucy Winfield | 6/10 | 2684 days | 3% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 2745 days | 3% |
| Elena Rusalen | 7/10 | 2796 days | 3% |
| Victoria Lee | 3/10 | 2828 days | 2% |
| Bram de Vries | 4/10 | 2847 days | 2% |
| Alba Mateos | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Philippa and Adam | 6/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
| Staffan Johansson | 4/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 3/10 | 3202 days | 1% |
| Travis Gregory | 1/10 | 3310 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 7/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Emmy Poole | 5/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Kirsty Longland | 8/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
| Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Elka Keijzer | 9/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
| Bjorn Privat | 2/10 | 3613 days | 1% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 7/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
| Richard | 1/10 | 3797 days | 0% |
| Laurene | 9/10 | 3939 days | 1% |
| Paul Wood | 7/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| Steven Wood | 8/10 | 4100 days | 1% |
| K & F | 7/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
| Maxime | 2/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| William Notcutt | 6/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| hoppy | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Martin Thomas | 6/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Julia Ramseier | 6/10 | 4386 days | 1% |
| Tjw | 9/10 | 4527 days | 1% |
| Heiner Reinecke | 9/10 | 4641 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 9/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| Mike3 | 9/10 | 4649 days | 1% |
| Janet | 9/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
| Tamara McVey | 9/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
| Schneider | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Susie Christensen | 9/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
| akglenny | 10/10 | 4709 days | 1% |
| tramper | 10/10 | 4709 days | 1% |
| _mel_ | 9/10 | 4709 days | 1% |
| Tuibaby22 | 10/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| Sillmann | 8/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| David & Mary-Jane Ryder | 9/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| Tony & Rachel | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
| Alberto Redner | 10/10 | 4756 days | 1% |
| Lardy | 8/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
| JadesWorld | 7/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4831 days | 1% |
| Karin & Bastiaan | 8/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| Nick van de Belt | 9/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
| Kris Gijbels | 9/10 | 4993 days | 1% |
| Andreas Blessing | 8/10 | 4995 days | 1% |
| De Groot | 7/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
| S and A Koehue | 10/10 | 5015 days | 1% |
| Canille Lechat | 9/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Simon Vallis | 8/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Barry | 9/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| Sue & Graham Mullin | 4/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
| Katrin & Mark | 9/10 | 5043 days | 1% |
| KieranE | 8/10 | 5319 days | 1% |
| M and H Lunn | 8/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| keane | 9/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
| vernenal | 9/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
| Elodie | 9/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
| Hennie Neeleman | 8/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
| Pieter Neeleman | 8/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
| Karen Fisher | 4/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
| katesh | 9/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| MorganK | 9/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
| monikav | 8/10 | 5714 days | 1% |
| familytravellers | 8/10 | 5726 days | 1% |
| EelcoK | 8/10 | 5749 days | 1% |
| NicoleK | 6/10 | 5755 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.87% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 43 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 40 | -0.81% |
| 41 | -0.83% |
| 42 | -0.85% |
| 43 | -0.87% |
| 44 | -0.89% |
| 45 | -0.91% |
| 46 | -0.93% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
7.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.