Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks

Valid Reviews

28 Valid Reviews

The Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 28 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 28 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 12
43%
9/10 8
29%
8/10 1
4%
7/10 1
4%
6/10 1
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 5
18%
1/10 0
0%

79.64% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 79.64% and is based on 28 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

80.57%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Guest 8/10 237 days 100%
Linda Brooking 9/10 1027 days 43%
Sebastian Stoof 2/10 1089 days 17%
Jen Shadbolt 9/10 1515 days 11%
Shar-ron & Jim 9/10 1515 days 11%
Caroline Williams 10/10 1607 days 8%
Ines 10/10 1758 days 5%
Mrs Lounis 7/10 1820 days 5%
Scooper 9/10 2034 days 5%
Verona 10/10 2123 days 5%
Konstantin 10/10 2154 days 5%
Reinhard 9/10 2488 days 4%
Tanja Laube 9/10 3177 days 2%
Tessa Stukstette 6/10 3236 days 2%
Quentin Nodet 10/10 3557 days 2%
Wagner Silveira 9/10 4011 days 1%
Liz S 10/10 4133 days 0%
Jade LG 10/10 4286 days 0%
Gary Alway 10/10 4345 days 0%
Bishops 10/10 4406 days 1%
Helle 10/10 4742 days 1%
ksmith 10/10 5168 days 1%
escapist 10/10 5168 days 1%
bev57 9/10 5229 days 1%
Morgan M 2/10 5410 days 0%
dan warren 2/10 5441 days 0%
Ngatai Purnell 2/10 5441 days 0%
tracey karam 2/10 5441 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.06% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Beachaven Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.00%
198 -4.02%
199 -4.04%
200 -4.06%
201 -4.08%
202 -4.10%
203 -4.12%

Balancing Adjustment

4.09% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.