Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

53 Valid Reviews

The Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 53 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
28%
9/10 12
23%
8/10 11
21%
7/10 4
8%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 2
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 4
8%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 1
2%

78.68% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 78.68% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

19 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 19 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 19 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
26%
9/10 6
32%
8/10 4
21%
7/10 4
21%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.32% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 86.32% and is based on 19 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

82.55%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Hilary 10/10 51 days 100%
Hilary 10/10 51 days 100%
Caitlin 10/10 173 days 98%
Alex 9/10 294 days 94%
Sue Stafford 9/10 294 days 94%
K. O'Toole 2/10 600 days 36%
V L Nelson 3/10 659 days 41%
Ian Wallace 1/10 812 days 25%
Jo McAlpine 8/10 1024 days 41%
Dan 10/10 1269 days 23%
Emma Brownless 6/10 1361 days 15%
NzMo 3/10 1389 days 9%
Nicole 10/10 1634 days 7%
Mike Smith 5/10 1786 days 4%
Kate Shields 9/10 1878 days 5%
David Wilson 8/10 2031 days 4%
Mateusz Konopka 3/10 2151 days 2%
Margie 10/10 2212 days 4%
Camping-Dave 8/10 2243 days 4%
ian kennedy 8/10 2243 days 4%
Fer&And 9/10 2304 days 4%
Marjolein Bakker 10/10 2442 days 4%
Eversons 8/10 2485 days 4%
Laurie Meston 10/10 2811 days 3%
Ron Ozarka 10/10 2973 days 3%
Alice Craig 8/10 3135 days 2%
Chester Martin 8/10 3384 days 2%
Craig 6/10 3553 days 1%
Kim Kosic 9/10 3657 days 1%
Mirjam B. 9/10 3673 days 1%
Philip Donachie 8/10 3934 days 1%
Luisa Bach 8/10 3934 days 1%
Josefina Tassone 9/10 3967 days 1%
ilove totravel 5/10 3977 days 1%
catherine welsh 6/10 3977 days 1%
Peter 7/10 4366 days 0%
charlotte_10 9/10 4617 days 1%
De Groot 7/10 4998 days 1%
nga 3/10 5014 days 1%
Selina Mueller 10/10 5028 days 1%
marisraneth 9/10 5348 days 1%
Alan & Lorna 8/10 5372 days 1%
Mathias Skov 10/10 5393 days 1%
Hannah Clark 10/10 5400 days 1%
Veltmaat NL 10/10 5413 days 1%
Werner Swiss 10/10 5429 days 1%
menzel 7/10 5452 days 1%
arminh 8/10 5492 days 1%
emmah 7/10 5596 days 1%
MorganK 9/10 5710 days 1%
KatieR 9/10 5711 days 1%
Ingrid Thijssen 10/10 5713 days 1%
Jake1 9/10 5715 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.59% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 29 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
26 -0.53%
27 -0.55%
28 -0.57%
29 -0.59%
30 -0.61%
31 -0.63%
32 -0.65%

Balancing Adjustment

2.49% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

84%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.