Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
106 Valid Reviews
The Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 107 reviews. There are 106 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 106 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 32 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.42% and is based on 106 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
48 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 106 valid reviews, the experience has 48 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 48 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 88.33% and is based on 48 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| MatthiasB | 8/10 | 75 days | 98% |
| Tim Schmitter | 10/10 | 106 days | 100% |
| Millie | 8/10 | 228 days | 96% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 351 days | 93% |
| Andre | 10/10 | 441 days | 89% |
| Rob | 9/10 | 564 days | 82% |
| Anne | 7/10 | 594 days | 75% |
| Kawena Schuman | 9/10 | 686 days | 73% |
| Thomas Frank | 8/10 | 806 days | 62% |
| Simon | 8/10 | 837 days | 59% |
| Todd Caldwell | 9/10 | 837 days | 60% |
| Paige Hayward | 8/10 | 868 days | 56% |
| Lothar Valentijn | 9/10 | 898 days | 54% |
| Grumpster | 10/10 | 2086 days | 4% |
| Scooper | 8/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
| Amy Alexander | 8/10 | 2208 days | 4% |
| Megan | 7/10 | 2208 days | 4% |
| Jgcanada | 10/10 | 2267 days | 4% |
| R James | 2/10 | 2359 days | 2% |
| Deb S | 7/10 | 2390 days | 4% |
| Lee | 10/10 | 2420 days | 4% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 9/10 | 2734 days | 3% |
| Liz K | 8/10 | 3008 days | 3% |
| Scott O'Donnell | 9/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
| Geoffrey Brogden | 9/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
| lemennais perrine | 8/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
| Lavina Kerki | 8/10 | 3031 days | 3% |
| Susi Sorglos | 3/10 | 3058 days | 1% |
| Luke Young | 8/10 | 3158 days | 2% |
| Phillippa McLernon | 9/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Rainer Welsch | 5/10 | 3394 days | 1% |
| Jamie | 9/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 6/10 | 3485 days | 1% |
| Jacqui | 9/10 | 3493 days | 2% |
| Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3668 days | 1% |
| Nicky Hurst | 10/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
| Tineke Verschueren | 9/10 | 3694 days | 1% |
| Andrew Jones | 8/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Florian Kleemann | 7/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Laurie | 10/10 | 3727 days | 1% |
| Stephen McNair | 8/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 9/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
| Neville Smith | 8/10 | 3880 days | 1% |
| Richard | 9/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
| Family Trip | 9/10 | 4065 days | 1% |
| Glenda | 10/10 | 4093 days | 1% |
| Jake Bell | 10/10 | 4124 days | 0% |
| Paul Wood | 8/10 | 4155 days | 0% |
| Ut & Sacha | 10/10 | 4216 days | 0% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Andrew Pearce | 10/10 | 4489 days | 1% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4489 days | 1% |
| David Restell | 8/10 | 4489 days | 1% |
| Wouter Trumpie | 7/10 | 4509 days | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Fam von Hattem | 8/10 | 4532 days | 1% |
| Huw Davies | 8/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| Rob Klauer | 8/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
| Ed Trucie | 9/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
| Peter Dellen | 9/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 8/10 | 4807 days | 1% |
| Peter Putz | 9/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
| Liz Stokes | 9/10 | 4811 days | 1% |
| Scott Simpson | 10/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
| Johannes & Katrin | 9/10 | 4823 days | 1% |
| Fabienne Indergand | 10/10 | 4890 days | 1% |
| Benjamin Meier | 8/10 | 4901 days | 1% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 10/10 | 4902 days | 1% |
| Anne Quehe | 9/10 | 4902 days | 1% |
| Tacksharp | 10/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
| lyndavid | 10/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
| Rens Hemselmans | 8/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| J Palmer | 9/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
| Liz & Jim | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
| Omar Candon | 10/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
| Annelie & Martin | 9/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
| Tobias Torax | 10/10 | 5176 days | 1% |
| Tayler Gray | 9/10 | 5176 days | 1% |
| Stefan Morris | 8/10 | 5180 days | 1% |
| Theo Dykhuizen | 10/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| Fred | 8/10 | 5189 days | 1% |
| Carl_Larsen | 10/10 | 5465 days | 1% |
| AlisonB | 10/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
| marisraneth | 9/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 9/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
| Tim Stick | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
| Mathias Skov | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
| Daryl Taylor | 10/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| Susan | 10/10 | 5550 days | 1% |
| Carolina Gonzalez | 10/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
| joannaw | 8/10 | 5601 days | 1% |
| pimn | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
| GoodTimes | 9/10 | 5616 days | 1% |
| Furger | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
| jank | 9/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
| clairet | 7/10 | 5725 days | 1% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| michellew | 10/10 | 5808 days | 1% |
| KatieR | 9/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| Steve Harper | 7/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| NicoleG | 9/10 | 5893 days | 1% |
| Grimm | 8/10 | 5907 days | 1% |
| Chris | 7/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 67 days. However the Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Waitomo TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 61 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 58 | -0.99% |
| 59 | -1.01% |
| 60 | -1.03% |
| 61 | -1.04% |
| 62 | -1.06% |
| 63 | -1.08% |
| 64 | -1.09% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.