G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cave Stream Scenic Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Cave Stream Scenic Reserve
Valid Reviews
50 Valid Reviews
The Cave Stream Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 50 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
74% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.80% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cave Stream Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 96.80% and is based on 50 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
37 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 50 valid reviews, the experience has 37 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
70% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cave Stream Scenic Reserve face-to-face reviews is 96.22% and is based on 37 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
98.33%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kdoe | 10/10 | 776 days | 100% |
| Pete | 10/10 | 1718 days | 8% |
| Justin | 10/10 | 1871 days | 7% |
| Joan Dangerfield | 10/10 | 2327 days | 5% |
| Bob the genious | 10/10 | 2602 days | 4% |
| Wilhelm Wiechel | 9/10 | 2706 days | 4% |
| Emma Philpott | 10/10 | 2953 days | 3% |
| Frank Ryan | 10/10 | 2982 days | 3% |
| Car R | 10/10 | 2995 days | 3% |
| Kolar | 10/10 | 3016 days | 3% |
| Stuart Gange | 9/10 | 3049 days | 3% |
| Huon | 10/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Cecile | 9/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Jari Kahelin | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Floriane Desnoyer | 10/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| Elodie Bardolle | 8/10 | 3341 days | 2% |
| Yarden Oliva | 10/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
| Jan Penicka | 10/10 | 3358 days | 2% |
| Kim S | 10/10 | 3545 days | 2% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3688 days | 1% |
| Tarillon Family | 8/10 | 3688 days | 1% |
| Sue Strebe | 8/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| Helen Olsson | 10/10 | 4039 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 10/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Philip Schumann | 10/10 | 4059 days | 0% |
| Jonas Hessel | 10/10 | 4060 days | 0% |
| Igor | 10/10 | 4063 days | 0% |
| Ann Winter | 10/10 | 4081 days | 0% |
| Phillip | 10/10 | 4081 days | 0% |
| Jason MacLeod | 10/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
| Debora Grusler | 10/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
| Lisbeth Sorum | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Cameron Tarbotton | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Katharina | 10/10 | 4415 days | 1% |
| Fabian | 10/10 | 4415 days | 1% |
| Eric | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Rogier Ramaker | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Melvin Groenhof | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 4487 days | 1% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 4760 days | 1% |
| Rachel_Flowers | 10/10 | 4884 days | 1% |
| D Patterson | 10/10 | 4914 days | 1% |
| Sophie Burge | 9/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Auditor | 10/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
| Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 5161 days | 1% |
| Paap | 9/10 | 5164 days | 1% |
| Tim Pfahlert | 9/10 | 5175 days | 1% |
| Daniela Seibel | 10/10 | 5179 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 9/10 | 6283 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cave Stream Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
98%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.