Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Bay of Islands Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
46 Valid Reviews
The Bay of Islands Holiday Park experience has a total of 46 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
78.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Bay of Islands Holiday Park valid reviews is 78.26% and is based on 46 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
13 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 46 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
9/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
46% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Bay of Islands Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.46% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
76.80%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Tarah Bailey | 10/10 | 61 days | 100% |
MHall | 5/10 | 457 days | 67% |
Julia Pene | 7/10 | 518 days | 79% |
Judy Tipping | 9/10 | 641 days | 76% |
Melanie | 3/10 | 671 days | 40% |
Ryan Cox | 10/10 | 671 days | 74% |
jane green | 9/10 | 702 days | 71% |
Jill Gregory | 10/10 | 702 days | 72% |
Natasha | 1/10 | 761 days | 27% |
Not that impressed | 2/10 | 761 days | 30% |
Chloe | 1/10 | 761 days | 27% |
Jme | 1/10 | 853 days | 23% |
Raewyn Jobe | 9/10 | 914 days | 52% |
Destiny Edmonds | 9/10 | 1036 days | 40% |
Joe reddick | 10/10 | 1187 days | 28% |
M&Z | 9/10 | 1310 days | 20% |
Gareth | 10/10 | 1371 days | 16% |
B Woodman | 10/10 | 1491 days | 11% |
Tiaan Kotze | 9/10 | 1522 days | 10% |
Linda | 8/10 | 1644 days | 6% |
Ian & Wendy | 7/10 | 1797 days | 4% |
Sharmila Patel | 10/10 | 1888 days | 4% |
Sailorboy | 9/10 | 1918 days | 4% |
Grumpster | 9/10 | 2010 days | 4% |
Cameron | 9/10 | 2222 days | 4% |
Lizzie | 9/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
Mehdi | 10/10 | 2528 days | 3% |
FraserM | 10/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2840 days | 3% |
Antoine Greiller | 8/10 | 3283 days | 2% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 3383 days | 1% |
John Treasure | 8/10 | 4017 days | 0% |
Denise & Maciej Holzer | 2/10 | 4723 days | 0% |
Frans | 8/10 | 4731 days | 0% |
Walker | 8/10 | 5057 days | 0% |
Jon_and_Family | 10/10 | 5085 days | 1% |
Andreas Scholl | 10/10 | 5089 days | 0% |
Selina Mueller | 10/10 | 5099 days | 0% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5105 days | 0% |
Barry | 9/10 | 5106 days | 0% |
Remro | 8/10 | 5438 days | 0% |
M and H Lunn | 8/10 | 5459 days | 0% |
Groen | 8/10 | 5475 days | 0% |
Bill Nash | 8/10 | 5544 days | 0% |
Ed | 7/10 | 5825 days | 0% |
Nick | 7/10 | 5827 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Bay of Islands Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Bay of Islands Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Bay of Islands Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 43 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
40 | -0.83% |
41 | -0.85% |
42 | -0.87% |
43 | -0.89% |
44 | -0.91% |
45 | -0.93% |
46 | -0.95% |
… | … |
4.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.